freediver
Gold Member
![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif)
Offline
![](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/avatars/UserAvatars/freediver.jpg)
www.ozpolitic.com
Posts: 49371
At my desk.
|
freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 9:29pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 9:07pm: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 7:21pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:58pm: Who I called is my business. Would it be fair to say that you called someone who did not want you to call them? Who I called is my business, OK? What was your response to IQ handing out photos of me and then defaming me ON YOUR WEBSITE? Can you tell me? Would it show that members can trust this board/website? I'm not even asking who you called Monk. Read the question. Would it be fair to say that you called someone who did not want you to call them? Are you having difficulty understanding the question Monk? Aussie wrote on Oct 28 th, 2020 at 7:54am: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 7:25pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 7:09pm: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:55pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:53pm: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:49pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:48pm: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:46pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:44pm: Super Nova wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:41pm: So the honest answer is "You do not value people privacy" and you are a liar about it. as you're not a member of his forum, you don't need to worry about it to much now do you. What about the people who are? Do they need to worry? I am, I'm not worried. Now why don't you start to worry about YOUR forum. Is the privacy of your members protected or not? Sure. For example I have banned plenty of people for sharing Aussie's personal information, despite him leaving a trail of breadcrumbs about all his nefarious deeds. What nefarious deeds? The ones that people keep posting about and getting themselves into trouble. You describe whatever it is as 'nefarious.' Why? The only way you can even start to answer that question is to breach your own Rule about privacy and that establishes that no Member here will have their privacy protected by the Management. Nothing like what happened here has ever happened at Monk's Forum, and if it ever does, I will be the first to walk away from it. So why do you keep asking me for the details if you know that providing them would be against the rules? Exactly. You have zero evidence of any nefarious deeds. I have plenty of evidence. Aussie wrote on Oct 28 th, 2020 at 7:58am: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 9:29pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 9:07pm: freediver wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 7:21pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27 th, 2020 at 6:58pm: Who I called is my business. Would it be fair to say that you called someone who did not want you to call them? Who I called is my business, OK? What was your response to IQ handing out photos of me and then defaming me ON YOUR WEBSITE? Can you tell me? Would it show that members can trust this board/website? I'm not even asking who you called Monk. Read the question. Would it be fair to say that you called someone who did not want you to call them? Where is your evidence that he called anyone? You really don't understand what a question mark is do you Aussie?
|