|
scope
|
Frank wrote on Sep 25 th, 2020 at 9:26pm: scope wrote on Sep 25 th, 2020 at 6:44pm: Frank wrote on Sep 25 th, 2020 at 6:20pm: scope wrote on Sep 25 th, 2020 at 4:56pm: Frank wrote on Sep 25 th, 2020 at 4:47pm: you mean like these? cant buy paint,ffs Yeah - not being able to buy basic things like paint, have a haircut is a crazy over-reach. Lockdown for months is stupid, unjustifiable, ineffective, no matter how much you emote. It's the Greta Thunberg 'how dare you disagree with me' reaction. ( Her home country didn't fall for it).It's based on idiotic modelling that suggest that if the government doesn't clamp down on people then people themselves will behave as if there was nuffin' to worry about. That is idiotic. The media is overreaching, as they always do. And who the fricassee is TYT anyway? Just a youtuber with glasses. As a trump supporter you must also be a little pissed of over his lies about Covid? All your claims of being ineffective are just idotic, plenty of countries locked down and the result, well just look at how many are dead in the US, 203,000 so far. Trump is now telling lies about this, he first claimed only 40,000 to 60,000 would die, now hes claiming that he said 200,000 deaths would be a good result. But you will ignore his lies like most Trump supporters do. Sweden, you think their voluntary lockdown worked? After Sweden pursued a controversial non-lockdown policy at the start of the pandemic, case numbers have markedly dropped throughout the country in recent months. But Stockholm health chief Björn Eriksson has warned that the long decline in infections had halted, reports The Telegraph. "The downwards trend is broken," he said at a press conference. "We can only hope that this is a blip, that the spread starts decreasing again." Officials are now considering about bringing in restrictions for Stockholm residents. "Right now we are in discussions on whether we need to bring in additional restrictions to reduce the spread of infection in Stockholm," state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell said. https://www.9news.com.au/world/coronavirus-sweden-new-measures-may-be-needed-aft...Covid Deaths in Sweden 5878 cases 90,000 Norway 278 13,210 Finland 341 9,365 Yea, Sweden is a country to admire, allowing nearly 6,000 to die. Nobody knows. So you can be an optimist, a pessimist, a bob each way kinda guy. Euro trash Belgium did a lot worse, same in Borisland. Peru is cactus, as is India, etc. Lockdown for months is not the answer anywhere. Nobody knows, everyone has an opinion. Total bulldust, talking out of your arse again,they knew back in 1918-1920 some cities shut down, those that did sufferered half the deaths of cities that did nothing. From its first known U.S. case, at a Kansas military base in March 1918, the flu spread across the country. Shortly after health measures were put in place in Philadelphia, a case popped up in St. Louis. Two days later, the city shut down most public gatherings and quarantined victims in their homes. The cases slowed. By the end of the pandemic, between 50 and 100 million people were dead worldwide, including more than 500,000 Americans—but the death rate in St. Louis was less than half of the rate in Philadelphia. The deaths due to the virus were estimated to be about 358 people per 100,000 in St Louis, compared to 748 per 100,000 in Philadelphia during the first six months—the deadliest period—of the pandemic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/03/how-cities-flattened-curve-19...Of course, getting citizens to comply with such orders is another story: In 1918, a San Francisco health officer shot three people when one refused to wear a mandatory face mask. In Arizona, police handed out $10 fines for those caught without the protective gear. But eventually, the most drastic and sweeping measures paid off. After implementing a multitude of strict closures and controls on public gatherings, St. Louis, San Francisco, Milwaukee, and Kansas City responded fastest and most effectively: Interventions there were credited with cutting transmission rates by 30 to 50 percent. New York City, which reacted earliest to the crisis with mandatory quarantines and staggered business hours, experienced the lowest death rate on the Eastern seaboard. Recent studies in 2007. The studies reached another important conclusion: That relaxing intervention measures too early could cause an otherwise stabilized city to relapse. St. Louis, for example, was so emboldened by its low death rate that the city lifted restrictions on public gatherings less than two months after the outbreak began. A rash of new cases soon followed. Of the cities that kept interventions in place, none experienced a second wave of high death rates.
|
Forum
Pages: 
