Jasin wrote on Oct 25^th, 2020 at 4:20pm:


Back in the 1970's these very same clowns were predicting an ice age and cooling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling

Maybe this is because temperatures dropped from the 1940's to the 1970's.



Plus dude you should visit here

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1603506584

That is what this environmental movement is all about.

Nothing to do with saving the planet they want to crush capitalism.

Jasin wrote on Oct 25^th, 2020 at 4:31pm:


What does Stephen Donaldson have to do with the science of climate change....???

In 1990  the IPCC AR1 paper showed the lamb graph which clearly shows a Medieval Warm Period (MWP) & a little Ice Age (LIA).

In 2001 they took out the lamb graph and replaced it with Mann's famous hockey stick.

Mann was challenged many times by sceptic climate scientists to provide his working out of how he came about the hockey stick, some went on to work it out for themselves and then published the results which showed Manns hockey stick was fraudulent.

Another scientists Tim Ball called him (Mann) out on this, Mann got furious and sued Tim Ball.

They went to court after 8 years because Mann kept delaying it.

In court Mann would not show his working out and how he came to the conclusion of the hockey stick, a classic case of the science is settled sit down and shut up.

Well the court got fed up with him and awarded Tim Ball the win, Mann had to pay costs.

Why wouldn't Mann show his working out, if it is true (the hockey stick) and he can prove it why didn't he show the working out.

But wait there's more.

In the IPCC AR5 paper Manns Hockey stick got thrown under a bus and the IPCC have now returned to something like the lamb graph that has a bump and a dip that represent the MWP and LIA.

Now I ask you what sort of peer review have the IPCC got going over there, they publish rubbish until proven false, where are their own checks...???

I bet no one at the IPCC checked the hockey stick there was no peer review until Tim Ball called it out along with many other climate scientist that are sceptical about the AGW religion, oops I mean science......

And we are making plans to spend billions of tax payers monies on the stock market buying carbon derivatives because the IPCC says so.

F@rk me is it really that easy to make billions of dollars from billions of suckers.

I don't blame Climate Change for the death of the Mega-Fauna and Marsupials in Australia. I still put that down to the Tasmanian and Murrayan waves of Aboriginals perfecting their BBQ Fire Farming skills before the Carpentarians came in to burn them south.

The Orca know the answer. 

Gordon wrote on Oct 25^th, 2020 at 5:21pm:


Everyone is allowed to believe in what ever they want to, BUT what if it was a lie.....?

1. CO2 is a greenhouse gas.................................TRUE

2. CO2 contributes to the greenhouse effect..........TRUE

3. CO2 is invisible to the human eye....................TRUE

So much for those chimney stacks spewing out black and white clouds, that is not CO2...!

4. CO2 is plant food...........................................TRUE

5. CO2 is a pollutant..........................................FALSE

Our soft drinks and beer those bubbles are CO2 are we drinking pollution...?.
We inhale and exhale CO2 are we breathing pollution..?

6. CO2 controls temperature on Earth.................FALSE

7. CO2 can cause a runaway greenhouse effect....FALSE

8. CO2, natural or manmade is solely responsible for the current warming we are experiencing...FALSE

9. CO2 due to the burning of fossil fuels has created this current warm period..........FALSE

It may come as shock to you to learn the truth that MOST scientists disagree with the claim that the current warm period we have experienced is all due to man burning fossil fuels and sending up extra manmade CO2 in to our atmosphere.

Because climate science has become politicized for whatever reason and the few scientists who push this dooms day agenda have demonized the MAJORITY of scientists who disagree with this theory.

When a climate scientists stands up and speaks the truth about climate change and how CO2 is not the devil the warmists have painted, he or she is victimized with discrimination and threats even to the point of losing their jobs or worse, now is this how science works I ask you…?

Big banks, Agencies, corporations and research institutes and even big oil are all towing this theory of manmade climate change making it seem more credible to the general public.

What most don’t know is if a scientists within these organisations disagrees with the Anthropogenic Global Warming theory unless he or she doesn’t mind being sacked they will usual keep their opinions to themselves, this is the type of environment this politicized science has created, where scientists are scared to speak the truth.

The pope of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) . 

The IPCC sets government policies on how to combat AGW this is usually a carbon tax or an emissions trading scheme or anywhere between the two.

A large number of climate scientists who disagree with the IPCC on AGW have now formed the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), so instead of being heard as individuals and victimized they are now heard as a large group.

Below are the views of many climate scientists who disagree with the narrative of AGW we have been presented through mainstream media and everything else that’s owned by the oligarchy.

https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/Books/Why%20Scientists%20Di...

https://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf