Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Anthropogenic Global Warming 101 (Read 6566 times)
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #75 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 11:39am
 
JoNova LIES!
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #76 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 12:00pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 11:39am:
JoNova LIES!


Oh please you know you haven't got a leg to stand on so now you're on the attack, kill the messenger.

No she doesn't lie, she presents the facts and I'm a fan... Cool

...

http://co2science.org/cSearch.php?action=SEARCH&lan=&keyword=medieval+warm+perio...

Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49740
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #77 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 12:14pm
 
Everyone presents more facts than Monk.
Even Brian.  Cheesy (just kiddin Bri-Bro  Wink)
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #78 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 1:12pm
 
I honestly believe this is our future, unless we the people do something about it.

Quote:
I'm sure many of you here support this tyranny!


Progressives plan a ‘great reset’ throughout the world with the UN in charge

Progressives hope to use climate change to justify liberal /leftist policy changes. The latest is a new proposal called the “Great Reset.” It’s ambitious and it’s radical, according to Justin Haskins of Heartland Institute writing at The Hill.

At a virtual meeting earlier in June hosted by the World Economic Forum, some of the planet’s most powerful business leaders, government officials, and activists announced a proposal to “reset” the global economy.

Instead of traditional capitalism, the high-profile group said the world should adopt more socialistic policies, such as wealth taxes, additional regulations, and massive Green New Deal-like government programs.

They call it progressive capitalism. It puts the UN in charge of the world economy and weaponizes it. They get to regulate, tax, and track.

The UN becomes the government auditor of businesses with everything geared to climate and social justice. It will reduce agriculture and fishing. People will be moved into city environments where control is easier. Resources from the suburbs will be shifted to cities. It is why farmland is being gobbled up by corporations.

Companies that get involved now will be among the elite.

EVERY COUNTRY MUST PARTICIPATE
“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed,” wrote Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, in an article published on WEF’s website. “In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

Schwab also said that “all aspects of our societies and economies” must be “revamped,” “from education to social contracts and working conditions.”

Joining Schwab at the WEF event was Prince Charles, one of the primary proponents of the Great Reset; Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; and CEOs and presidents of major international corporations, such as Microsoft and BP.

Activists from groups such as Greenpeace International and a variety of academics also attended the event or have expressed their support for the Great Reset.

Many of the Forum’s members want to use this as a no opportunity for World Economic Forum members to enact their radical transformation of capitalism.

Somehow, in some inexplicable way, this is supposed to help the world deal with pandemics.

After the pandemic is over, they plan to blow up the climate change ‘crisis’ as the next calamity to be dealt with.

There are radical leftist global shapers [the new Bolsheviks] around the world who are preparing the world for the change. The Global Shapers program was involved in the widespread “climate strikes” of 2019, and more than 1,300 have already been trained by the Climate Reality Project, the highly influential, well-funded climate activist organization run by former Vice President Al Gore, who serves on the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees.

We have heard our Democrats and world leaders promise massive changes using the pandemic as an excuse. Now you know what they have in mind. It is in line with Agenda 2030.

Look at what our ‘leaders’ have been able to make us do so far over a virus?

We will all be China.

https://www.independentsentinel.com/progressives-plan-a-great-reset-throughout-t...


mortdooley presented this piece on ozpol here

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=post;num=1604228621;virboard=;quot...




Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 2nd, 2020 at 1:23pm by Ajax »  

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18034
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #79 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 1:50pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 10:23am:
Many hockey sticks:



Yep. Marcott et al. But he was honest.

...

" Our global paleotemperature reconstruction includes a so-called “uptick” in temperatures during the 20th-century. However, in the paper we make the point that this particular feature is of shorter duration than the inherent smoothing in our statistical averaging procedure, and that it is based on only a few available paleo-reconstructions of the type we used. Thus, the 20th century portion of our paleotemperature stack is not statistically robust, cannot be considered representative of global temperature changes, and therefore is not the basis of any of our conclusions."

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2013/03/response-by-marcott-et-al/

"Q: Is the rate of global temperature rise over the last 100 years faster than at any time during the past 11,300 years?"

"A: Our study did not directly address this question because the paleotemperature records used in our study have a temporal resolution of ~120 years on average, which precludes us from examining variations in rates of change occurring within a century. Other factors also contribute to smoothing the proxy temperature signals contained in many of the records we used, such as organisms burrowing through deep-sea mud, and chronological uncertainties in the proxy records that tend to smooth the signals when compositing them into a globally averaged reconstruction."

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2013/03/response-by-marcott-et-al/

So what smoothing did Mann use? Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18034
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #80 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 1:55pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 9:50am:
Try reading the extracts, bet they won’t say what you think.



Poor petal. Obviously you haven't read the papers. Otherwise being the "scientist" that you are you could demolish them.Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #81 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 2:56pm
 
lee wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 1:55pm:
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 9:50am:
Try reading the extracts, bet they won’t say what you think.



Poor petal. Obviously you haven't read the papers. Otherwise being the "scientist" that you are you could demolish them.Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Mong is a scientist?  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18034
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #82 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 3:12pm
 
Neferti wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 2:56pm:
Mong is a scientist?



A geologist he says. More like a Golem.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 107069
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #83 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 3:21pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 10:32am:
No Ajax that would be you.

The MWP and the LIA were not concurrently global—neither period was warm or cool over the whole globe and the LIA was mainly a North Atlantic phenomenon.



But the Thames river froze over.
Will it happen again?
If the Atlantic conveyor- the Gulf Stream stops
then it will.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/climate/impact/gulf_stream.shtml

The Gulf Stream brings warmth to the UK and north-west Europe and is the reason we have mild winters. Without this steady stream of warmth the British Isles winters are estimated to be more than 5C cooler, bringing the average December temperature in London to about 2C.



Monk,
Will you apologise if the Thames river freezes over again?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18034
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #84 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 3:39pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 10:32am:
The MWP and the LIA were not concurrently global—neither period was warm or cool over the whole globe and the LIA was mainly a North Atlantic phenomenon.


Perhaps or perhaps not.

" We present proxy-climate data (plant macrofossils; peat humification) covering the past three millennia from an ombrotrophic mire (peat bog) in Tierra del Fuego, southern South America, but focus our discussion on the period traditionally associated with the LIA. During parts of this time, the mire surface was apparently relatively dry compared with much of its 3000-year record. It was reported earlier that a particularly dry episode in the mire coincided with the 2800 cal. BP ‘solar’ event (since identified as a Grand Solar Minimum), which was attributed to solar-driven changes in atmospheric circulation, and more specifically to a shift in position of the Westerlies. Parts of the LIA record show a similar shift to dryness, and we invoke a similar cause. The shifts to and from dry episodes are abrupt. These new data support the concept of a global LIA, and for at least the intense dry episodes might reinforce the claim for solar forcing of parts of the LIA climate."

"The 'Little Ice Age' in the Southern Hemisphere in the context of the last 3000 years: Peat-based proxy-climate data from Tierra del Fuego"

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268511817_The_'Little_Ice_Age'_in_the_S...

You do understand the lack of land masses and widespread confirmation?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #85 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 3:51pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 10:32am:
No Ajax that would be you.

The MWP and the LIA were not concurrently global—neither period was warm or cool over the whole globe and the LIA was mainly a North Atlantic phenomenon.


You are wasting your time JM

Ajax is a deluded conspiracy theorist
lee is a parasite whose only posts on this forum are to try and discredit other peoples posts. He contributes nothing.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #86 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 4:00pm
 
Ajax is a decent guy, will willingly give him some of my time.

Prefer to do that in my board tho Ajax.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18034
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #87 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 4:20pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 3:51pm:
lee is a parasite whose only posts on this forum are to try and discredit other peoples posts. He contributes nothing.



Perhaps you have something constructive? You know like how the study was flawed?

No i didn't think so. My own little troll. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #88 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 4:43pm
 
lee wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 3:12pm:
Neferti wrote on Nov 2nd, 2020 at 2:56pm:
Mong is a scientist?



A geologist he says. More like a Golem.


This Gollum?
Back to top
 

index_014.jpg (7 KB | 7 )
index_014.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49740
Gender: male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101
Reply #89 - Nov 2nd, 2020 at 7:07pm
 
That very Gollum Nef  Wink
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print