Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7
th, 2020 at 9:58pm:
rhino wrote on Nov 7
th, 2020 at 8:10pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7
th, 2020 at 7:39pm:
rhino wrote on Nov 7
th, 2020 at 6:27pm:
One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they
are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women)
Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't. Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date?
Total bullpuckey.
You have evidence to prove that? Really? Lets see it...
Sexism is old school. So old school only antediluvians support it still.
So sexism against men = policies of exclusion and non-preference (as opposed to preference), specialised 'education' giving better results, preferential scholarships etc when one group is 62% of the student body and the other is excluded - are NOT sexism?
I'd say, to the contrary, that REAL sexism is alive and thriving under the aegis of stupid, self-serving governments and institutions..... look around - every job in any government sphere 'must' be filled by a woman, no matter how incompetent or even average in real performance.
For every woman on the road gang or grass mowing detail, there are half a dozen in the overpaid clerical positions that men filled admirably - setting the yardsticks - for countless decades, but are now excluded from unless they kiss the ass of their female co-workers and suck up to ideology.
That goes way up the coast here - any council without a woman mayor is viewed as 'sexist'.... and women MPs are flooding the joint in the Nationals, who are, of course, now largely comprised of 'town' bushies (like Barnaby) with all the ideological jigsaw bits in place about 'development' and 'progress' and so forth. And people still vote for them as if they 'represent the bush'.
When will this end??