Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
A new attack chopper for the Army (Read 1591 times)
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40354
A new attack chopper for the Army
Jan 15th, 2021 at 1:12pm
 
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #1 - Jan 15th, 2021 at 1:17pm
 
The Commonwealth has announced it has selected the Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopter to replace the Australian Army’s fleet of 22 Airbus Tiger armed reconnaissance helicopters under Project LAND 4503.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40354
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #2 - Jan 15th, 2021 at 2:26pm
 
It is an expected result.  Logistically, the Tigers were a disaster the Apaches will be better from that respect.  Politically?  Not too sure.
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #3 - Jan 15th, 2021 at 2:35pm
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_AH-64_Apache



In July 2019, Australia's Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group issued a request for information to replace the Tiger helicopters, despite the 2016 White Paper suggesting all problems with the Tiger to be resolved and were to receive a $1–2 billion Mid Life Upgrade.[288] As a part of the Australian Army's Land 4503, Boeing has offered Australia 29 AH-64E Helicopters that would reach full operating capability by 2029.[289]




AH-64E Apache Guardian


Formerly known as AH-64D Block III, in 2012, it was redesignated as AH-64E Guardian to represent its increased capabilities.[308][309] The AH-64E features improved digital connectivity, the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System, more powerful T700-GE-701D engines with upgraded face gear transmission to accommodate more power,[310] capability to control unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), full IFR capability, and improved landing gear.[311][312] New composite rotor blades, which successfully completed testing in 2004, increase cruise speed, climb rate, and payload capacity.[313] Deliveries began in November 2011.[314]

Full-rate production was approved on 24 October 2012,[315] with 634 AH-64Ds to be upgraded to AH-64E standard and production of 56 new-build AH-64Es to start in 2019/20.[316] Changes in production lots 4 through 6 shall include a cognitive decision aiding system and new self-diagnostic abilities. The updated Longbow radar has an oversea capacity, potentially enabling naval strikes; an AESA radar is under consideration.[317] The E model is to be fit for maritime operations.[318]

The Army has expressed a desire to add extended-range fuel tanks to the AH-64E to further increase range and endurance.[137] AH-64Es are to have the L-3 Communications MUM-TX datalink installed in place of two previous counterparts, communicating on C, D, L, and Ku frequency bands to transmit and receive data and video with all Army UAVs.[319] Lots 5 and 6 will be equipped with Link 16 data-links.[320] As of April 2020, 500 AH-64E have been delivered
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9348
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #4 - Jan 15th, 2021 at 6:02pm
 
Apache ?

Oh no ... too racist!!!  Grin

How about Cheers attack helicopter?  Wink
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 82607
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #5 - Jan 17th, 2021 at 1:36am
 
Should've had 'em years ago.  Same as when the Guv bought F/A-18s - heavy on the juice and half the payload was taken up in fuel tanks..... for the same price could have had the same number of F-16 squadrons and the same number of A-10s again
(the US sold NO A-10s overseas, for good reason)
- dedicated ground attack aircraft.

But the 18s had two engines....... and were sexy...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40354
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #6 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 5:49pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 17th, 2021 at 1:36am:
Should've had 'em years ago.  Same as when the Guv bought F/A-18s - heavy on the juice and half the payload was taken up in fuel tanks..... for the same price could have had the same number of F-16 squadrons and the same number of A-10s again
(the US sold NO A-10s overseas, for good reason)
- dedicated ground attack aircraft.

But the 18s had two engines....... and were sexy...


They could also operate BVR missiles, land attack missiles, ARM and other munitions, which the F-16 could not.  The two engines were thought necessary because they were expected to be operating far from shore, protecting the fleet because the MELBOURNE was being retired.  The F-15 was too expensive and couldn't do diddly squat in attacking ground targets.  The F-16 was a lightweight fighter and it showed (at the time) being only able to carry WiVR missiles and dumb bombs. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #7 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 5:53pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 5:49pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 17th, 2021 at 1:36am:
Should've had 'em years ago.  Same as when the Guv bought F/A-18s - heavy on the juice and half the payload was taken up in fuel tanks..... for the same price could have had the same number of F-16 squadrons and the same number of A-10s again
(the US sold NO A-10s overseas, for good reason)
- dedicated ground attack aircraft.

But the 18s had two engines....... and were sexy...


They could also operate BVR missiles, land attack missiles, ARM and other munitions, which the F-16 could not.  The two engines were thought necessary because they were expected to be operating far from shore, protecting the fleet because the MELBOURNE was being retired.  The F-15 was too expensive and couldn't do diddly squat in attacking ground targets.  The F-16 was a lightweight fighter and it showed (at the time) being only able to carry WiVR missiles and dumb bombs. Roll Eyes



Brian -
let me educate you -


The f-16s carried a huge payload to bomb the Iraqi reactors.


A flight task force of Israeli F-16s deliver an airstrike to Iraq's nuclear reactor in Operation Opera, 1981.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40354
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #8 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:11pm
 
Dumb bombs, Bobby.  Dumb bombs.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #9 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:25pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:11pm:
Dumb bombs, Bobby.  Dumb bombs.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I think they were guided smart bombs but
there is no information I can find about what they used.
I read a report once that said they came from France.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40354
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #10 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 8:28pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:11pm:
Dumb bombs, Bobby.  Dumb bombs.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I think they were guided smart bombs but
there is no information I can find about what they used.
I read a report once that said they came from France.


Nope, dumb bombs:

Quote:
The attack squadron consisted of eight F-16As, each with two unguided Mark-84 2,000-pound delay-action bombs.

Source

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #11 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:25pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 8:28pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:11pm:
Dumb bombs, Bobby.  Dumb bombs.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I think they were guided smart bombs but
there is no information I can find about what they used.
I read a report once that said they came from France.


Nope, dumb bombs:

Quote:
The attack squadron consisted of eight F-16As, each with two unguided Mark-84 2,000-pound delay-action bombs.

Source

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I'm not sure if that source is true?
The fact that all 16 bombs landed right on the target
is not normal for dumb bombs.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #12 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:33pm
 
Also Brian - your source says:

Quote:
The purchase also included a smaller accompanying Isis-type reactor, the sale of 72 kilograms of 93% enriched uranium



That would be weapons grade Uranium 235.
There is no way that France would have give Saddam that.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:43pm by Bobby. »  
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40354
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #13 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:42pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 8:28pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:11pm:
Dumb bombs, Bobby.  Dumb bombs.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I think they were guided smart bombs but
there is no information I can find about what they used.
I read a report once that said they came from France.


Nope, dumb bombs:

Quote:
The attack squadron consisted of eight F-16As, each with two unguided Mark-84 2,000-pound delay-action bombs.

Source

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I'm not sure if that source is true?
The fact that all 16 bombs landed right on the target
is not normal for dumb bombs.  Roll Eyes


Quote:
At least eight of the sixteen released bombs struck the containment dome of the reactor
Source

That is a 50% failure rate, Bobby.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 100199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A new attack chopper for the Army
Reply #14 - Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:45pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:42pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 9:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 8:28pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18th, 2021 at 6:11pm:
Dumb bombs, Bobby.  Dumb bombs.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I think they were guided smart bombs but
there is no information I can find about what they used.
I read a report once that said they came from France.


Nope, dumb bombs:

Quote:
The attack squadron consisted of eight F-16As, each with two unguided Mark-84 2,000-pound delay-action bombs.

Source

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



I'm not sure if that source is true?
The fact that all 16 bombs landed right on the target
is not normal for dumb bombs.  Roll Eyes


Quote:
At least eight of the sixteen released bombs struck the containment dome of the reactor
Source

That is a 50% failure rate, Bobby.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



The video I posted claimed all 16 bombs hit their target.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print