greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18
th, 2021 at 11:45am:
[quote author=Jest link=1610772639/108#108 date=1610933802]
If I accuse you greggerypeccary of child rape, its also undeniable that you are an "alleged" child rapist in the way you use that expression. So from now on should we speak of greggerypeccary in ozpolitics as the alleged child rapist.
Not quite the same, though.
Donald Trump is an alleged child rapist because the alleged victims have made the accusations and several affidavits and witness statements have been lodged as part of an official New York court case.
Moreover, Trump is on record grooming a ten year old child.
As far as greggerypeccary goes, one disgruntled forum member has made a baseless claim just because he lost an argument. Hardly the same thing, dear boy.
Now, you can persist with this line of attack if you wish, it's a free country, but I must warn you that you risk being banned from this forum for a very, very,
very long time if you do (there is a GMod here who, if he sees your post, will not be too impressed).
As a piece of friendly advice I suggest that you leave forum members out of this and just admit that Donald Trump is undeniably a documented alleged child rapist.
If its not the same thing its because your use and abuse of the expression "alleged child rapist" is far worse. The proceedings you're referring to were dropped very shortly after they were filed and on top of that they were civil proceedings not criminal (so if she filed charges with police it doesn't look like they were prepared to run the case); the proceedings were brought while trump was running for President in 2016 (political motivation) and you've even said that you dont necessarily believe that the charges are true.