Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Faith (Read 10402 times)
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #15 - Feb 22nd, 2021 at 11:10am
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 6:13pm:
It begs the question of how sure we can be about anything but
especially about something that is impossible to see -
the inside of atoms.


If repeatable experiments provide consistent results then we can be sure.
As I've already mentioned, there is plenty of evidence that our knowledge about atoms is correct, from nuclear reactors to rusting and any other chemical reactions that can easily be predicted and confirmed.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #16 - Feb 22nd, 2021 at 11:14am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 5:57pm:
Science has no ethical, esthetic, interpersonal answers. Science isnt a TOTAL explanation, it is a method of asking questions and testing answers to those questions.



Psychology and anthropology can answer most of the questions you are implying.

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 5:57pm:
But not every question is a scientific one. Most of the ones we live by aren't. This doesnt diminish science, it limits it.



So why don't you provide a question that science can't answer?
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104680
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #17 - Feb 22nd, 2021 at 1:48pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 22nd, 2021 at 11:10am:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 6:13pm:
It begs the question of how sure we can be about anything but
especially about something that is impossible to see -
the inside of atoms.


If repeatable experiments provide consistent results then we can be sure.
As I've already mentioned, there is plenty of evidence that our knowledge about atoms is correct, from nuclear reactors to rusting and any other chemical reactions that can easily be predicted and confirmed.



It's still strange though.
The electrons exist in shells surrounding the atom.
You would think that shells of electrons would all repel each other.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #18 - Feb 22nd, 2021 at 2:20pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2021 at 1:48pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 22nd, 2021 at 11:10am:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 6:13pm:
It begs the question of how sure we can be about anything but
especially about something that is impossible to see -
the inside of atoms.




If repeatable experiments provide consistent results then we can be sure.
As I've already mentioned, there is plenty of evidence that our knowledge about atoms is correct, from nuclear reactors to rusting and any other chemical reactions that can easily be predicted and confirmed.



It's still strange though.
The electrons exist in shells surrounding the atom.
You would think that shells of electrons would all repel each other.


The nucleus contains protons
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:14am by The_Barnacle »  

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104680
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #19 - Feb 22nd, 2021 at 2:49pm
 
Barny - your point?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #20 - Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:15am
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2021 at 2:49pm:
Barny - your point?


I made my response in the wrong field.
I have amended my reply
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #21 - Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:18am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 5:57pm:
Science has no ethical, esthetic, interpersonal answers. Science isnt a TOTAL explanation, it is a method of asking questions and testing answers to those questions.

But not every question is a scientific one. Most of the ones we live by aren't. This doesnt diminish science, it limits it.



Frank, I'm waiting to hear the questions you claim that science doesn't have the ability to answer
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48241
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #22 - Feb 23rd, 2021 at 4:45pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 12:15pm:
Jasin wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 12:14pm:
Isn't faith a poor man's bargaining tool with a book in his hand  at the other end of a Military weapon?



If you walk using crutches and you have enough faith -
you can throw the crutches away and walk normally.


Thank Europe for the Medical Industry, while being invaded by Religious people from the Middle-East who walked across  the Medical-rannean sea.


As I said to a guy working next to me at the Nursing Station.
"Are you religious?" I asked.
"Yes. I'm a Christian" he answered proudly.
"Well here then - you can do the paperwork" as I got up to attend to the ward again and shoved the paperwork his way.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104680
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #23 - Feb 23rd, 2021 at 5:09pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:15am:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2021 at 2:49pm:
Barny - your point?


I made my response in the wrong field.
I have amended my reply



You said
The nucleus contains protons -
we know that but there are also neutrons for elements above Hydrogen.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48241
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #24 - Feb 23rd, 2021 at 9:12pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:18am:
Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 5:57pm:
Science has no ethical, esthetic, interpersonal answers. Science isnt a TOTAL explanation, it is a method of asking questions and testing answers to those questions.

But not every question is a scientific one. Most of the ones we live by aren't. This doesnt diminish science, it limits it.



Frank, I'm waiting to hear the questions you claim that science doesn't have the ability to answer


A Scientist will tell us that the Earth is NOT at the center of the Universe - and they are right.
A Spiritualist will tell us that the Earth is the center of OUR Universe and they too are right.

one rules the brain, the other the mind.
But as most people think there can be only one right answer - the world is populated by HALF-WITS on both sides.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #25 - Feb 24th, 2021 at 3:01pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 23rd, 2021 at 5:09pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:15am:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2021 at 2:49pm:
Barny - your point?


I made my response in the wrong field.
I have amended my reply



You said
The nucleus contains protons -
we know that but there are also neutrons for elements above Hydrogen.



electrons are attracted to Protons
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24977
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #26 - Aug 19th, 2021 at 2:10am
 
The last guy that tried to merge faith and religion, lost his job in politics. Not for Australia in the 21st century.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46176
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #27 - Oct 15th, 2021 at 1:55pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:18am:
Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 5:57pm:
Science has no ethical, esthetic, interpersonal answers. Science isnt a TOTAL explanation, it is a method of asking questions and testing answers to those questions.

But not every question is a scientific one. Most of the ones we live by aren't. This doesnt diminish science, it limits it.



Frank, I'm waiting to hear the questions you claim that science doesn't have the ability to answer


Any question about meaning.  Any question about purpose (which is ultimately about meaning). Any question about ethics and esthetics (meaning, purpose, value).

All the important, meaningful stuff of life.  Science is very valuable but its limits need to be recognised.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #28 - Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:10pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 1:55pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 23rd, 2021 at 10:18am:
Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2021 at 5:57pm:
Science has no ethical, esthetic, interpersonal answers. Science isnt a TOTAL explanation, it is a method of asking questions and testing answers to those questions.

But not every question is a scientific one. Most of the ones we live by aren't. This doesnt diminish science, it limits it.



Frank, I'm waiting to hear the questions you claim that science doesn't have the ability to answer


Any question about meaning.  Any question about purpose (which is ultimately about meaning). Any question about ethics and esthetics (meaning, purpose, value).

All the important, meaningful stuff of life.  Science is very valuable but its limits need to be recognised.

Putting aside for now the contentious issue of ‘meaning’ let’s ask ourselves if Freud and Jung’s subjective investigations are now a suitable area for neuroscience to re-exmine or is this area still out of bounds to science?

Or maybe you’re actually asserting only those areas outside the realm of science are important &/or meaningful?
Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Faith
Reply #29 - Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:18pm
 
Here... Smoke this...


Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print