Australian Politics Forum

Mod. Moderator Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1196 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #270 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 4:38pm Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 4:18pm: Don't delete Mod Poll deleted See Rule 9. This is your fifth warning. You have had two ban warnings. *Cease posting in Relationships until further notice.* PM on the way to you, FD and the GMods.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #271 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:13pm Don't delete Mod
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103432
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #272 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:18pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 2:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 2:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 2:13pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 1:54pm:

Lisa has been denigrated because she's a woman.

no, Lisa has been denigrated because she is a moron.
Until you come up with evidence to suggest otherwise, you're barking up the wrong tree.

see my post above and watch Julia's speech.

Re: New Rule
Reply #242 - Yesterday at 9:28pm

I doubt you even understand Julia's speech. If you did you'd know that t has absolutely nothing to do with the comment about Lisa.

Why are you such an idiot?

Smith,
You're a halfwit -
it's all there before you but you can't comprehend it.
Go back and try again.

Back to top

IP Logged

Johnnie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 12485 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #273 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:19pm It's Aussie rules , pretty much anything that goes.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103432
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #274 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:19pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2021 at 8:16pm:

That's what he said. I asked you to show me the misogyny. The term PIG is not gender specific.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny

The (Etymological) Roots of Misogyny

Misogyny may be distinguished from the closely related word sexism, which signifies discrimination based on sex (although it most frequently refers to discrimination against women) and also carries the meaning “behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex.”

Misogyny refers specifically to a hatred of women

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/misogyny

misogyny
[ mi-soj-uh-nee, mahy- ]
See synonyms for misogyny on Thesaurus.com
noun
hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women, manifested in various forms such as physical intimidation and abuse, sexual harassment and rape, social shunning and ostracism, etc.: the underlying misogyny in slut-shaming;Historically witch hunts were an embodiment of the misogyny of the time.
ingrained and institutionalized prejudice against women; sexism.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #275 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:21pm Johnnie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:19pm: It's Aussie rules , pretty much anything that goes. How is one supposed to find things out?
Back to top	IP Logged

Mod. Moderator Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1196 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #276 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:50pm Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:21pm: Johnnie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 5:19pm: It's Aussie rules , pretty much anything that goes. How is one supposed to find things out? You have now defied the ban. I have now asked freediver and GMods to impose a forum wide ban, as per FD's Rules.
Back to top	IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16531
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #277 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:24pm

Well hasn't there been a lot of look over there! We need an on topic post to bring it back to the OP.

You made a rule Aussie, obviously to protect a man of diminished mental capacity, can't handle his anger, flounces out when pissed off, Posts like a manic one moment, depressed the next. That's all well and good to do that for a friend but if you make a rule like that you must carry it to all posters, Gregg has at least twice breached this rule and you have done nothing.

What's funy is Gregg would probably take one for the team but because it was me who brought it to your attention and when you did nothing, taunted you for it. Now you are between a rock and a hard place, the right thing or your pride. Which will win? I'm betting on your pride.

You made the rule, your MRB, do the right thing.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38550
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #278 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:28pm

Setanta wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:24pm:

Well hasn't there been a lot of look over there! We need an on topic post to bring it back to the OP.

You made a rule Aussie, obviously to protect a man of diminished mental capacity, can't handle his anger, flounces out when pissed off, Posts like a manic one moment, depressed the next. That's all well and good to do that for a friend but if you make a rule like that you must carry it to all posters, Gregg has at least twice breached this rule and you have done nothing.

What's funy is Gregg would probably take one for the team but because it was me who brought it to your attention and when you did nothing, taunted you for it. Now you are between a rock and a hard place, the right thing or your pride. Which will win? I'm betting on your pride.

You made the rule, your MRB, do the right thing.

I have. You are now banned from posting in Relationships until further notice.

I have already explained why I regard it as acceptable that peccerry would comment as he did given the repeated assertions made by Jones that he is a fraud. She has no evidence of that, and to do so persistently over and over and over and over provides peccerry with sufficient cause explanation etc so far as I am concerned.

Now, fuq off out of my MRB until I tell you that you can post here again. You have lost that privilege, as Bubby would say.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 16531 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #279 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:28pm OK, Aussie, I've just seen your post in the other thread, I'll cease posting here. Way to shut down the debate about your ignominious duplicitous behaviour.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mod.

Moderator

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 1196
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #280 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:32pm

Setanta wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:28pm:

OK, Aussie, I've just seen your post in the other thread, I'll cease posting here. Way to shut down the debate about your ignominious duplicitous behaviour.

I am not shutting down debate.

I am shutting YOU down.

You are deliberately breaching Rule 10 despite obvious warnings from me.

Fuq off until I say you can post here again.

I am quite happy for anyone to continue to debate the matter but when you do so, don't breach Rule 10, or any other Rule.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 12141 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #281 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough. They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned. Why is that?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38550 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #282 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:23pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm: Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough. They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned. Why is that? Because racism is rampant here. The owner and GMods do nothing about it.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #283 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:26pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm: Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough. They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned. Why is that? Indian women ARE sexy.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103432
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #284 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:29pm

Hi Aussie,
are you also going to ban Greggy for these posts?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:02pm:

Take a screen shot of that then.

Why?

I'm not Jim.

Lisa is an alcoholic troll with chronic mental health issues.

Why are you pandering to its pathetic cries for help?

Don't give it what it wants.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:43pm:

Jim Lahey wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:40pm:

Lyin' Lisa is a crappy low effort troll...

I think it has serious mental health issues, so I'm gonna go easy on it from now on.

It's actually not very nice to make fun of people with mental illness.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 4^th, 2021 at 8:05pm by Bobby. »

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Is Valkie potentially a violent criminal?
Yes 3 (42.9%) Could be, could be 4 (57.1%) Total votes: 7 « Created by: Mr Hammer on: Dec 4^th, 2021 at 10:18pm »