Australian Politics Forum

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Online

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 45977
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #285 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:35pm

Lisa is obviously not well mentally. Saying so does not require qualifications in psych. She lives a lie here, a paracosm as North of North explained. She gets abusive very quickly.

Her pretend broad bean growing is a perfect example. Last time she mentioned them she “picked kilos” of broad beans in winter. This year she said she picked the first crop in October. Poppycock.

Lisa is not well mentally.

Back to top

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103432
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #286 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:37pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:35pm:

Lisa is obviously not well mentally. Saying so does not require qualifications in psych. She lives a lie here, a paracosm as North of North explained. She gets abusive very quickly.

Her pretend broad bean growing is a perfect example. Last time she mentioned them she “picked kilos” of broad beans in winter. This year she said she picked the first crop in October. Poppycock.

Lisa is not well mentally.

Quick Aussie -
another breach of your rule by Monk -

ban him.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38552
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #287 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:37pm

No.

First. Peccerry made one post and Jim Lahey the other. (Just checked. Peccerry made them both.)

Second. I have already told you that I have concluded they each have sufficient valid reason for making that post given the number of time Lisa Jones has insisted, with zero evidence, on the absurd notion that Jim Lahey and peccerry are one and the same, and that they each have emerged from some Yahoo Forum. She has persisted over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over in calling each of them frauds, and I have decided that provides sufficient justification for them to respond as they did.

Feel free to disagree with that ruling but that is why I have allowed those posts to stand, and you can hold your breath and go as blue in the face as you like, that ruling will stand.

Noticeably, both you and Setanta have ignored that explanation of mine, pretending or preferring I have not posted it.

I guess you each have some other agenda ey Bubby?

What is that I wonder?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:43pm by Aussie »

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103432
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #288 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:37pm

Hi Aussie,
are you also going to ban Greggy for these posts?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:02pm:

Take a screen shot of that then.

Why?

I'm not Jim.

Lisa is an alcoholic troll with chronic mental health issues.

Why are you pandering to its pathetic cries for help?

Don't give it what it wants.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:43pm:

Jim Lahey wrote on Dec 1^st, 2021 at 7:40pm:

Lyin' Lisa is a crappy low effort troll...

I think it has serious mental health issues, so I'm gonna go easy on it from now on.

It's actually not very nice to make fun of people with mental illness.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 4^th, 2021 at 8:05pm by Bobby. »

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Online Dogs not cats! Posts: 45977 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #289 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:38pm No it is not, just a simple observation.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103432
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #290 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:40pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:37pm:

No.

First. Peccerry made one post and Jim Lahey the other.

Second. I have already told you that I have concluded they each have sufficient valid reason for making that post given the number of time Lisa Jones has insisted, with zero evidence, on the absurd notion that Jim Lahey and peccerry are one and the same, and that they each have emerged from some Yahoo Forum. She has persisted over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over in calling each of them frauds, and I have decided that provides sufficient justification for them to respond as they did.

Feel free to disagree with that ruling but that is why I have allowed those posts to stand, and you can hold your breath and go as blue in the face as you like, that ruling will stand.

Noticeably, both you and Setanta have ignored that explanation of mine, pretending or preferring I have not posted it.

I guess you each have some other agenda ey Bubby?

What is that I wonder?

Hi Aussie,
under your own rule -
you don't have any psychiatric qualifications.
You should ban yourself.

Another agenda?
Yes - I am wondering if you have a fair and impartial
approach to be honored as the exalted leader at PA?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38552
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #291 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:42pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:37pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:35pm:

Lisa is obviously not well mentally. Saying so does not require qualifications in psych. She lives a lie here, a paracosm as North of North explained. She gets abusive very quickly.

Her pretend broad bean growing is a perfect example. Last time she mentioned them she “picked kilos” of broad beans in winter. This year she said she picked the first crop in October. Poppycock.

Lisa is not well mentally.

Quick Aussie -
another breach of your rule by Monk -

ban him.

No. He also has been called a fraud by Lisa Jones as she has, over and over and over and over etc etc insisted that Monk too is Jin Lahey and she goes further, alleging with zero evidence that Jim Lahey is a shared account.

However....

Monk:

That does come close to the wind in the current context. It is unnecessary and needlessly provocative. Others could construe it as some sort of attempt by you to force my hand in some way.

You can get away with that ONE, but don't do it again in Relationships.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12143
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #292 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:42pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm:

Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough.
They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned.
Why is that?

Because racism is rampant here. The owner and GMods do nothing about it.

Then this site runs the risk of being shut down. Other sites, twitter and facebook accounts have been shut down for the same or maybe less.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58239
Here
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #293 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:43pm

Not sure I care for rules a lot but would it not be nice is everyone was treated politely and with respect ?

Anyone really believe that calling people names solves anything ?

Irrespective of what the person is like it only makes the insulting poster look bad and diminishes any real issue with the person they insult.

Responding politely to an insult makes the insulter look twice as bad.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38552
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #294 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:45pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:43pm:

Not sure I care for rules a lot but would it not be nice is everyone was treated politely and with respect ?

Anyone really believe that calling people names solves anything ?

Irrespective of what the person is like it only makes the insulting poster look bad and diminishes any real issue with the person they insult.

Responding politely to an insult makes the insulter look twice as bad.

If only it worked that way, ey? Problem is...it does not and I am left having to herd cats somehow.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12143
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #295 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 8:04pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:57pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm:

Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough.
They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned.
Why is that?

Because racism is rampant here. The owner and GMods do nothing about it.

Then this site runs the risk of being shut down. Other sites, twitter and facebook accounts have been shut down for the same or maybe less.

Have the mods here had complaints in the past?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #296 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 8:16pm No, it's all good.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74305 Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #297 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 8:51pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm: Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough. They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned. Why is that? the owner and the G mods promote racism. They only ban you if you defend the other 'races'.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Mod.

Moderator

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 1196
Gender: male

Re: New Rule
Reply #298 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 9:10pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 8:04pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:57pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 4^th, 2021 at 6:58pm:

Whoever are the moderators here, I note on a search that posts vilifying race are common enough.
They have not been removed or redacted and I assume the posters have not been banned.
Why is that?

Because racism is rampant here. The owner and GMods do nothing about it.

Then this site runs the risk of being shut down. Other sites, twitter and facebook accounts have been shut down for the same or maybe less.

Have the mods here had complaints in the past?

Complaints...where? If you mean here...sure. Many of them.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103432 Melbourne Gender:	Re: New Rule Reply #299 - Dec 4^th, 2021 at 9:16pm You only have to worry when the mod writes in green.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: Is Valkie potentially a violent criminal?
Yes 3 (42.9%) Could be, could be 4 (57.1%) Total votes: 7 « Created by: Mr Hammer on: Dec 4^th, 2021 at 10:18pm »