Frank wrote on Feb 24
th, 2022 at 11:32am:
You do enjoy talking complete rot, don't you?
That's not debate, you didn't expose my error (being "complete rot"), but I see you have some more to say, so let's read on:
Quote: Guaranteed how? By the UN looking very very cross indeed?
No, by the UNSC ALONE
possessing, and authorized to use, 99.9% of the world's military force, since such a UNSC (without veto) will guarantee security for ALL nations.
Now admittedly, "freedom" ideologues have a strong death wish, and little love of life; eg, those settler nutjobs on the WB might need to be eliminated with a well-placed missile delivered by the UNSC
if they insist on spurning (after all opportunity to repent) the rulings of an ICJ upholding the principles of the UN UDHR. Quote:Not even capital punishment can guarantee the end to murders but the UN looking very displeased and tut-tutting sternly will guarantee the end of wars.
More or less correct......a few well-aimed hypersonic missiles, available ONLY to the UNSC, will indeed guarantee the end of war, even "freedom" ideologues no doubt have the
capacity for rationality, to save themselves. Quote:We have an international rules based system already
No we don't: you need a credible force to maintain rule of law.
Quote: but that doesn't stop China from trampling on Hong Kong, monstering Taiwan, running gulags for dissenters, threatening Australia, Canada, Lithuania, the UK, lying and cheating despate promising honesty if admitted to the WTO, etc, etc.
Well, I'll play along with your deluded ideological characterization: and say..... correct(!); and you propose to stop China doing these things...how, exactly?