Bertie wrote on Jul 2
nd, 2021 at 5:52pm:
He is a clinical psychologist who has read Jung, Milton, Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Solzhenitsyn and a lot of neuroscience and literature.
He is speaking to young people who can't get enough of the stuff because they never hear it in school or uni.
I think it's easy to understand but there is a lot of depth, as you say.
It is like Jung, a doctor and a sage, lecturing on the Bible as an expression of the human condition. It's stupendous.
..because it reinforces your ideology?
Paul Thagard Ph.D.
Feb. 14th. 2018.
Jordan Peterson’s Flimsy Philosophy of Life
Peterson’s claims about morality, reality, and the meaning of life are dubious.
"
But philosophers since Plato have recognized many problems with basing ethics on religion. First, different religions have different prescriptions, and Peterson gives no argument why Christianity is morally superior to Islam, Hinduism, or dozens of alternatives. Even within Christianity, there is much disagreement among Catholics, Protestants, and Mormons. For morality to be based on religion, you need to be able to make a reasonable decision concerning which religion to choose.Least of all the Old Testament, imbued by the evil spirit of genocide, and hence rejected by Marcion as the basis of the New Testament relating the story of the "Prince of Peace".