Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus (Read 3939 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #30 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:28pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:16pm:
There are all sorts of explanations for why you post the crap you do. None of them reflect well on you.



And yet the later data supports the earlier data. The reflection you see is your own. Never mind petal. Keep trying. Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48923
At my desk.
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #31 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:30pm
 
The later data has the exact same problems.

Are you too lazy to dig up a more recent piece of crap?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58368
Here
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #32 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:31pm
 
Why would Billy be invited exactly ?

He set his plan on the belief that it will cost too much to restrict the warming below 4 to 6 degrees. This is the plan where you allow about 3 billion people to die to save some money because we were too stupid to act in time.

I suspect that they don't invite anyone who has a plan to basically do nothing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #33 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:54pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:30pm:
The later data has the exact same problems.



Which problem would that be petal? The adjustments put into the the global temperatures by NASA and NOAA?

freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:30pm:
Are you too lazy to dig up a more recent piece of crap?



The latest one is up to 2021; how recent do you want? Are you too lay to do any research yourself? Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #34 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:15pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:31pm:
He set his plan on the belief that it will cost too much to restrict the warming below 4 to 6 degrees. This is the plan where you allow about 3 billion people to die to save some money because we were too stupid to act in time.



...

The last two studies are from IPCC authors; so according to the. about 0.73C - 0.97C for CO2 up to 1000ppm. Nowhere near the postulate 4-6 degrees.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48923
At my desk.
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #35 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:17pm
 
Quote:
The latest one is up to 2021


The last one is not the temperature of the earth's climate.

Whichever way you try to spin it, you are always full of crap.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #36 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:22pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:17pm:
The last one is not the temperature of the earth's climate



That's right it is the anomaly with the models also in anomalies, which is in what they actually deal. And all of the graphs show that. Roll Eyes

You don't trust the anomalies? NASA/NOAA will not be pleased. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Edit: perhaps you want the 0.9C change in Kelvin on top of the 278Kelvin which is the earth's temperature (approximately). Wink
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:35pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58368
Here
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #37 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:30pm
 
lee wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:15pm:
Dnarever wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 6:31pm:
He set his plan on the belief that it will cost too much to restrict the warming below 4 to 6 degrees. This is the plan where you allow about 3 billion people to die to save some money because we were too stupid to act in time.



[url]https://edmhdotme.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/screen-shot-2016-05-28-
at-09-43-15.png[/url]

The last two studies are from IPCC authors; so according to the. about 0.73C - 0.97C for CO2 up to 1000ppm. Nowhere near the postulate 4-6 degrees.


It isn't my position it is what the William Nordhaus model suggests to be the optimal outcome.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #38 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:34pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:30pm:
It isn't my position it is what the William Nordhaus model suggests to be the optimal outcome.



Perhaps you can direct me to the quote of 3 billion deaths?

And which model DICE, RICE or other?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #39 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 8:24pm
 
I found something that suggested Bill Gates said that but was refuted. Nothing about Nordhaus.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58368
Here
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #40 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 8:45pm
 
lee wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:34pm:
Dnarever wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:30pm:
It isn't my position it is what the William Nordhaus model suggests to be the optimal outcome.



Perhaps you can direct me to the quote of 3 billion deaths?

And which model DICE, RICE or other?


https://theconversation.com/4-c-of-global-warming-is-optimal-even-nobel-prize-wi...

Quote:
In his Nobel Prize lecture, Nordhaus described a 4°C increase in global average temperature as “optimal” — that is, the point at which the costs and benefits of mitigating climate change are balanced.


Rockström doesn’t like our chances. “It’s difficult to see how we could accommodate eight billion people or maybe even half of that,” he says (note: this is at a time where the estimated population is 11 Billion). “There will be a rich minority of people who survive with modern lifestyles, no doubt, but it will be a turbulent, conflict-ridden world.” (He is discussing a 4 degree rise)

From <https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/may/18/climate-crisis-heat-is-on-gl...>




https://www.greenfacts.org/en/impacts-global-warming/l-2/index.htm


In a way it’s an obscene question: if the planet warms by 4 degrees Celsius (°C), would only a billion
people survive
and many billions perish? 

From <http://www.climatecodered.org/2019/08/at-4c-of-warming-would-billion-people.html>



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48923
At my desk.
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #41 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 9:29pm
 
lee wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:22pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 7:17pm:
The last one is not the temperature of the earth's climate



That's right it is the anomaly with the models also in anomalies, which is in what they actually deal. And all of the graphs show that. Roll Eyes

You don't trust the anomalies? NASA/NOAA will not be pleased. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Edit: perhaps you want the 0.9C change in Kelvin on top of the 278Kelvin which is the earth's temperature (approximately). Wink


Once again you are full of crap.

It is not the anomaly of the temperature of the earth's climate either.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #42 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 9:36pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 8:45pm:
https://theconversation.com/4-c-of-global-warming-is-optimal-eve
n-nobel-prize-wi...

Quote:
In his Nobel Prize lecture, Nordhaus described a 4°C increase in global average temperature as “optimal” — that is, the point at which the costs and benefits of mitigating climate change are balanced.



So Steve Keen disagrees but no mention of 3 billion.

"Nordhaus’s conclusions are based in part on the simple but wayward assumption that the weak relationship between temperature and GDP within the US today can be used to assume how future global temperature rises will affect the economy."

Much like the weak and wayward relationship between CO2 increase and Temperature. Wink

Ah I see where he got his delusional post about decrease in temperatures and GDP. Grin Grin Grin Grin

"But given the distinct possibility that 2°C of warming could set off a cascade of “tipping points” that cause the planet to irreversibly heat to catastrophic temperatures, can we afford to play with fire?"

Absolute frogshit. There is no point at which we get  "the planet to irreversibly heat to catastrophic temperatures". He is into Climate Seance not Science.

"But that adaptability has occurred in a remarkably stable climate where global temperatures have fluctuated by 1℃ below or above the average for the last 10,000 years."

About the same level as now.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 8:45pm:
Rockström doesn’t like our chances.


AH Rockström, Of the Climate Alarmist PIK.

"We’re looking at vast dead zones in the oceans as nutrients from fertiliser runoff combine with warmer waters to produce an explosion in algae that starve marine life of oxygen. This will be exacerbated by the acidity from dissolved CO2, which will cause a mass die-off, particularly of shellfish, plankton and coral. “We will have lost all the reefs decades before 2100 – at somewhere between 2C and 4C,” says Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany."

He doesn't seem to know about the millions of tonnes of Calcium Carbonate in the ocean that buffers any CO2. And the bones of the dead Cheesyead corals. dead people, dead whales the list goes on.

"Sea levels will be perhaps two metres higher and, more worryingly, we will be well on our way to an ice-free world, having passed the tipping points for the Greenland and west Antarctic ice sheets, committing us to at least 10 metres of sea-level rise in coming centuries."

Sea level Rise is about 3mm/ year. 80 years = 240 mm about 11inches.

...

...

"However, most rivers, especially in Asia, will flood more often, according to research by Richard Betts, head of climate impacts at the Met Office Hadley Centre, because the hotter atmosphere will produce more intense monsoons, violent storms and extreme rainfall. "

And yet that has shown no inkling of changing.

"Consequently, the current assessment is that there is low confidence regarding changes in monsoons at these lower global warming levels, as well as regarding differences in monsoon responses at 1.5°C versus 2°C." source IPCC AR5

"Some models predict that desert conditions will stretch from the Sahara right up through south and central Europe, drying rivers including the Danube and the Rhine"

...

So much crap in such a small space. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17509
Gender: male
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #43 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 9:38pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2021 at 9:29pm:
It is not the anomaly of the temperature of the earth's climate either.



Whatever you say petal. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48923
At my desk.
Re: The EU invites St Greta but not William Nordhaus
Reply #44 - Apr 26th, 2021 at 9:52pm
 
It's basically written on the graph Lee. Did you check that that what you were posting even made sense before posting it? Or does that not matter when you are always full of crap anyway?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print