Australian Politics Forum - ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 16926
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #15 - May 10^th, 2021 at 9:25pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:02pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:52am:

If they won't wear a mask to protect themselves, their family or their community, they don't get to pretend "protection" is why they need a gun.

Masks are theatre, expecting one to contain the virus is like expecting your underwear to contain a fart!

And so are guns.

A family member is more likely to kill themselves with a gun in the home than it is to be used on an intruder.

Back to top

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 16926
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #16 - May 10^th, 2021 at 9:31pm

Panther wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 12:24pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 11:50am:

Blah blah blah, deflect to the constitution all you like.

I was specifically mentioning those who say they need a gun for protection of themselves and those around them, the type that honestly believe they'll put their life on the line for others if there was an active shooter, who also break down like a toddler having a tantrum when they're asked to wear a mask.

They can't pretend protection of others is a justification for their desire to have a gun.

The constitution plays no part in this.

First of all you don't get the RIGHT to define or decide what part OUR sacred US Constitution plays in our lives....regardless of anything else, as an American our Sacred Constitution is our birthright, & the RIGHTS affirmed, protected, & defended within are just a few of our Inalienable Rights, OUR RIGHTS whether or not we choose to exercise them.........

I'm not telling anyone what to do, asshole, I'm saying if they try to justify their need for a gun based on the idea of "protection", but they're at the same time refusing to wear a mask to help protect those around them and in the community, they've proven they don't give a stuff about protection and should stop pretending that's why they want guns.

They don't care about anyone else.

It's the same for their "pro-life" stance. They're happy to force a woman to keep an unwanted pregnancy, but once the baby is born they don't care about its life. In fact, they'd be happy for it to be ended if it was by a gun lest they be forced to reassess gun ownership in the country and the constitutional amendment that allows them.

So piss of with your claims of protection and care for human life. A gun is a weapon of war which sole purpose is to end life.

All you pin dick low IQ morons simply like guns.

And that's fine, that's all the justification you need, especially when the constitution allows members of a well-regulated militia to own them.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #17 - May 10^th, 2021 at 10:05pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:02pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:52am:

If they won't wear a mask to protect themselves, their family or their community, they don't get to pretend "protection" is why they need a gun.

Masks are theatre, expecting one to contain the virus is like expecting your underwear to contain a fart!

You aren't interested in facing reality Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #18 - May 10^th, 2021 at 10:15pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:02pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:52am:

If they won't wear a mask to protect themselves, their family or their community, they don't get to pretend "protection" is why they need a gun.

Masks are theatre, expecting one to contain the virus is like expecting your underwear to contain a fart!

Well, certainly not the dribble down your leg type. But then you should be wearing diapers Mort if thats an issue for you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mortdooley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6991
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #19 - May 10^th, 2021 at 10:33pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 10:05pm:

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:02pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:52am:

If they won't wear a mask to protect themselves, their family or their community, they don't get to pretend "protection" is why they need a gun.

Masks are theatre, expecting one to contain the virus is like expecting your underwear to contain a fart!

You aren't interested in facing reality Roll Eyes

The reality is that gun laws only affect honest people and the virus has run its course but governments just can't let go of the power they have over the frightened masses!

Back to top

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.

IP Logged

Mortdooley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6991
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #20 - May 10^th, 2021 at 10:39pm

rhino wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 10:15pm:

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:02pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:52am:

If they won't wear a mask to protect themselves, their family or their community, they don't get to pretend "protection" is why they need a gun.

Masks are theatre, expecting one to contain the virus is like expecting your underwear to contain a fart!

Well, certainly not the dribble down your leg type. But then you should be wearing diapers Mort if thats an issue for you.

Sounds like the voice of experience, I wouldn't wish that problem on anyone. Even you.

Back to top

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.

IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 58161 Here Gender:	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #21 - May 10^th, 2021 at 10:52pm Wonder how many other laws it would work against. Not all that you would like I bet. Also wonder if you know about other clauses in the constitution ? Seems that Trump and co don't like section 4 of the fourteenth very much.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mortdooley Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6991 Texas Gulf Coast Gender:	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #22 - May 10^th, 2021 at 10:58pm “[N]either the United States nor any State shall assume or pay . . . any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave.” That reads like no former slave or the descendants of slaves are entitled to compensation either! No reparations for past slavery, the race baiters need to learn this!
Back to top	The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling. IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #23 - May 10^th, 2021 at 11:06pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 10:39pm:

rhino wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 10:15pm:

Mortdooley wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:02pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 10^th, 2021 at 9:52am:

If they won't wear a mask to protect themselves, their family or their community, they don't get to pretend "protection" is why they need a gun.

Masks are theatre, expecting one to contain the virus is like expecting your underwear to contain a fart!

Well, certainly not the dribble down your leg type. But then you should be wearing diapers Mort if thats an issue for you.

Sounds like the voice of experience, I wouldn't wish that problem on anyone. Even you.

You already have that problem on this forum, dribbling sh1t.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40938	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #24 - May 11^th, 2021 at 9:18am
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Mortdooley Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6991 Texas Gulf Coast Gender:	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #25 - May 11^th, 2021 at 10:31pm The Rich and Powerful are above the law. If it works for them I think it should work for me. I'll just call powerful friends to make any crime I commit go away just like Hillary.
Back to top	The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling. IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40938	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #26 - May 11^th, 2021 at 10:45pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Mortdooley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6991
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #27 - May 11^th, 2021 at 10:55pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 11^th, 2021 at 10:45pm:

https://www.liveabout.com/thmb/z1rqqeM3PMeAfCFGRVD8Pi3Acbc=/311x0/filters:no_ups...

Roll Eyes

Maybe we don't need thousands of laws. Lets just use the Ten Commandments and Contracts for agreements and ownerships! There shouldn't be such a huge difference between "right and wrong" and "legal and illegal".

Back to top

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40938	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #28 - May 12^th, 2021 at 12:18pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 47418
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #29 - May 12^th, 2021 at 12:30pm

Vote

YES

to empowering the USA Military (

Israel

)

Vote

NO

to empowering the USA Terrorist (

Islam

)

...with his bull-crap 'right' to use weapons (of mass destruction - like mass massacres), although NOT of the official Military.

By empowering the Common Man's right to carry arms is a basic condemnation and accusation of their own 'Professional' Military as being a Corruption.

In Australia - the British/Convict relationship was a HARMONIOUS one with Aboriginal peoples.
It was the FREE SETTLERS who came with their RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS that began the shooting sprees against Aboriginals in areas like Wiradjuri country and Tasmania. Most atrocities against Aboriginals were committed in Queensland - also known as the 'North America' State here in Australia.

So its that 'americanism' of the Right to carry a gun that 'invaded and genocided' the Aboriginals, not the British/Convict contribution here.
Only the Australian 'Military' have the true empowerment of carrying/using weapons. Citizens are heavily regulated and are of the 'privilege' to use a gun. Martin Bryant said he had a 'Right' to own a gun(s) and look what happened. American 'Freedom' action against evil oppressor bullcrap.

Disarm the American Citizen (Terrorist).

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged