Australian Politics Forum - ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40700 Gender:	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #300 - May 30^th, 2022 at 10:06pm
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #301 - May 30^th, 2022 at 10:35pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:03pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 8:55pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/310/EmXXPw.jpg

Roll Eyes

Norway is a homogenous society, the US is multicultural. It is as simple as that. Norway isn't being flooded with literally millions of third world people who do not share the values of the country they are invading! As the saying goes, statistics don't lie but you can lie with statistics. Without the forty million plus illegals and first generation illiterates our stat would be better than Norway.

Read up on the real demographics of Norway... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #302 - May 30^th, 2022 at 10:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 8:58pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 4:44pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/6731/HW8Fac.jpg

Roll Eyes

If they have so many genuine thoughts & prayers, why didn't they just pray to their God that no children would be killed in a mass shooting in the first place?

I'm curious.

Why would they do that when they were complicit in supplying the guns.

The term "thoughts and prayers" is just the words in the script, I doesn't actually mean anything.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103090
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #303 - May 30^th, 2022 at 10:48pm

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/28/politics/kamala-harris-assault-weapons-ban-bu...

Harris calls for assault weapons ban after back-to-back mass shootings

DJ Judd
Devan Cole byline

By Donald Judd and Devan Cole, CNN

Updated 2016 GMT (0416 HKT) May 28, 2022

Washington (CNN)Vice President Kamala Harris called for an assault weapons ban Saturday, saying that in the wake of two back-to-back mass shootings such arms are "a weapon of war" with "no place in a civil society."
"On the issue of gun violence, I will say, as I've said countless times, we are not sitting around waiting to figure out what the solution looks like. You know, we're not looking for a vaccine," Harris told reporters in Buffalo, New York, after attending the funeral for a victim of a mass shooting there earlier this month. "We know what works on this. It includes, let's have an assault weapons ban."
"You know what an assault weapon is? You know how an assault weapon was designed?" she continued. "It was designed for a specific purpose -- to kill a lot of human beings quickly. An assault weapon is a weapon of war with no place, no place in a civil society."

The comments from the vice president come as the nation is reeling from both Buffalo, where 10 people were killed in a racist mass shooting at a supermarket, and from a mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, earlier this week in which 19 children and two teachers were killed by a gunman.

Harris, who has previously called for an assault weapons ban, also on Saturday called for enhanced background checks for firearm purchases, noting that, to date, there have been over 200 mass shootings in the country, despite being "barely halfway through the year."
"Everybody's got to stand up and agree that this should not be happening in our country, and that we should have the courage to do something about it," she said.

Harris did not respond to a reporter's question on whether President Joe Biden would pursue an executive order if Congress failed to pass meaningful gun reform. The President said during a trip to Buffalo last week that there was "not much on executive action" that he could do to further strengthen gun control measures. He said he needed to instead "convince Congress" to pass legislation like the 1994 assault weapons ban.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mortdooley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6991
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #304 - May 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:35pm:

Mortdooley wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:03pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 8:55pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/310/EmXXPw.jpg

Roll Eyes

Norway is a homogenous society, the US is multicultural. It is as simple as that. Norway isn't being flooded with literally millions of third world people who do not share the values of the country they are invading! As the saying goes, statistics don't lie but you can lie with statistics. Without the forty million plus illegals and first generation illiterates our stat would be better than Norway.

Read up on the real demographics of Norway... Roll Eyes

Take out the five largest democrat cities in the US from your graph and we would be above UK! The people shooting people in those cities don't look like they came from Norway!

Back to top

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.

IP Logged

Mortdooley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6991
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #305 - May 30^th, 2022 at 11:05pm

Bobby. wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:48pm:

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/28/politics/kamala-harris-assault-weapons-ban-bu...

Harris calls for assault weapons ban after back-to-back mass shootings

DJ Judd
Devan Cole byline

By Donald Judd and Devan Cole, CNN

Updated 2016 GMT (0416 HKT) May 28, 2022

Washington (CNN)Vice President Kamala Harris called for an assault weapons ban Saturday, saying that in the wake of two back-to-back mass shootings such arms are "a weapon of war" with "no place in a civil society."
"On the issue of gun violence, I will say, as I've said countless times, we are not sitting around waiting to figure out what the solution looks like. You know, we're not looking for a vaccine," Harris told reporters in Buffalo, New York, after attending the funeral for a victim of a mass shooting there earlier this month. "We know what works on this. It includes, let's have an assault weapons ban."
"You know what an assault weapon is? You know how an assault weapon was designed?" she continued. "It was designed for a specific purpose -- to kill a lot of human beings quickly. An assault weapon is a weapon of war with no place, no place in a civil society."

The comments from the vice president come as the nation is reeling from both Buffalo, where 10 people were killed in a racist mass shooting at a supermarket, and from a mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, earlier this week in which 19 children and two teachers were killed by a gunman.

Harris, who has previously called for an assault weapons ban, also on Saturday called for enhanced background checks for firearm purchases, noting that, to date, there have been over 200 mass shootings in the country, despite being "barely halfway through the year."
"Everybody's got to stand up and agree that this should not be happening in our country, and that we should have the courage to do something about it," she said.

Harris did not respond to a reporter's question on whether President Joe Biden would pursue an executive order if Congress failed to pass meaningful gun reform. The President said during a trip to Buffalo last week that there was "not much on executive action" that he could do to further strengthen gun control measures. He said he needed to instead "convince Congress" to pass legislation like the 1994 assault weapons ban.

An illegal executive order would be unconstitutional.

Back to top

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #306 - May 31^st, 2022 at 12:49pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:35pm:

Mortdooley wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:03pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 8:55pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/310/EmXXPw.jpg

Roll Eyes

Norway is a homogenous society, the US is multicultural. It is as simple as that. Norway isn't being flooded with literally millions of third world people who do not share the values of the country they are invading! As the saying goes, statistics don't lie but you can lie with statistics. Without the forty million plus illegals and first generation illiterates our stat would be better than Norway.

Read up on the real demographics of Norway... Roll Eyes

Take out the five largest democrat cities in the US from your graph and we would be above UK! The people shooting people in those cities don't look like they came from Norway!

Racism, Mort? It doesn't become you. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Panther

Gold Member

Offline

My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11366
Gender: male

⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #307 - May 31^st, 2022 at 1:29pm

..

NULLIFICATION is the RIGHTFUL REMEDY.

A law....any law.....is only as powerful as those who are willing to enforce them.

If the President of the United States, the most powerful man on Earth, decides that the only way to effectuate his ill begotten political gun-control inclinations are via 'Executive Orders', & local law enforcement across the Nation refuse to enforce those orders because the law enforcement officers, duty bound by oath, regard those orders as unconstitutional......that the Executive Orders infringe upon an American Citizen's Constitutional Right to Keep & Bear Arms, which is affirmed & protected by the Second Amendment, their refusal to enforce is equivalent to NULLIFICATION.....thereby effectively making the Executive Orders Null & Void via their non-enforcement.

NULLIFICATION is the RIGHTFUL REMEDY.

Back to top

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #308 - May 31^st, 2022 at 3:20pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 11:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:48pm:

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/28/politics/kamala-harris-assault-weapons-ban-bu...

Harris calls for assault weapons ban after back-to-back mass shootings

DJ Judd
Devan Cole byline

By Donald Judd and Devan Cole, CNN

Updated 2016 GMT (0416 HKT) May 28, 2022

Washington (CNN)Vice President Kamala Harris called for an assault weapons ban Saturday, saying that in the wake of two back-to-back mass shootings such arms are "a weapon of war" with "no place in a civil society."
"On the issue of gun violence, I will say, as I've said countless times, we are not sitting around waiting to figure out what the solution looks like. You know, we're not looking for a vaccine," Harris told reporters in Buffalo, New York, after attending the funeral for a victim of a mass shooting there earlier this month. "We know what works on this. It includes, let's have an assault weapons ban."
"You know what an assault weapon is? You know how an assault weapon was designed?" she continued. "It was designed for a specific purpose -- to kill a lot of human beings quickly. An assault weapon is a weapon of war with no place, no place in a civil society."

The comments from the vice president come as the nation is reeling from both Buffalo, where 10 people were killed in a racist mass shooting at a supermarket, and from a mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, earlier this week in which 19 children and two teachers were killed by a gunman.

Harris, who has previously called for an assault weapons ban, also on Saturday called for enhanced background checks for firearm purchases, noting that, to date, there have been over 200 mass shootings in the country, despite being "barely halfway through the year."
"Everybody's got to stand up and agree that this should not be happening in our country, and that we should have the courage to do something about it," she said.

Harris did not respond to a reporter's question on whether President Joe Biden would pursue an executive order if Congress failed to pass meaningful gun reform. The President said during a trip to Buffalo last week that there was "not much on executive action" that he could do to further strengthen gun control measures. He said he needed to instead "convince Congress" to pass legislation like the 1994 assault weapons ban.

An illegal executive order would be unconstitutional.

https://i.postimg.cc/J7qzBxWv/voteno.jpg

If it is put in place and survives for 12 months which would save many lives then it would be worth it.

And no it is not un constitutional till the court rules on it which this corrupt court would be likely to do.

Back to top

IP Logged

Panther

Gold Member

Offline

My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11366
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #309 - May 31^st, 2022 at 8:27pm

Dnarever wrote on May 31^st, 2022 at 3:20pm:

Mortdooley wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 11:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 30^th, 2022 at 10:48pm:

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/28/politics/kamala-harris-assault-weapons-ban-bu...

Harris calls for assault weapons ban after back-to-back mass shootings

DJ Judd
Devan Cole byline

By Donald Judd and Devan Cole, CNN

Updated 2016 GMT (0416 HKT) May 28, 2022

Washington (CNN)Vice President Kamala Harris called for an assault weapons ban Saturday, saying that in the wake of two back-to-back mass shootings such arms are "a weapon of war" with "no place in a civil society."
"On the issue of gun violence, I will say, as I've said countless times, we are not sitting around waiting to figure out what the solution looks like. You know, we're not looking for a vaccine," Harris told reporters in Buffalo, New York, after attending the funeral for a victim of a mass shooting there earlier this month. "We know what works on this. It includes, let's have an assault weapons ban."
"You know what an assault weapon is? You know how an assault weapon was designed?" she continued. "It was designed for a specific purpose -- to kill a lot of human beings quickly. An assault weapon is a weapon of war with no place, no place in a civil society."

The comments from the vice president come as the nation is reeling from both Buffalo, where 10 people were killed in a racist mass shooting at a supermarket, and from a mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, earlier this week in which 19 children and two teachers were killed by a gunman.

Harris, who has previously called for an assault weapons ban, also on Saturday called for enhanced background checks for firearm purchases, noting that, to date, there have been over 200 mass shootings in the country, despite being "barely halfway through the year."
"Everybody's got to stand up and agree that this should not be happening in our country, and that we should have the courage to do something about it," she said.

Harris did not respond to a reporter's question on whether President Joe Biden would pursue an executive order if Congress failed to pass meaningful gun reform. The President said during a trip to Buffalo last week that there was "not much on executive action" that he could do to further strengthen gun control measures. He said he needed to instead "convince Congress" to pass legislation like the 1994 assault weapons ban.

An illegal executive order would be unconstitutional.

https://i.postimg.cc/J7qzBxWv/voteno.jpg

If it is put in place and survives for 12 months which would save many lives then it would be worth it.

And no it is not un constitutional till the court rules on it which this corrupt court would be likely to do.

If hundreds upon hundreds of Sheriffs all across America come to the decision not to enforce the 'Executive Order' indefinitely, the Order is effectively NULLIFIED due to non-enforcement.....they don't need a Supreme Court Ruling on Constitutionality to decide not to enforce the law that the Sheriffs see is unconstitutional in their opinion.....Furthermore:

Source: Wikipedia
Quote:

Since 1992,
the Supreme Court has ruled the Tenth Amendment prohibits the federal government from forcing states to pass or not pass certain legislation, or to enforce federal law
.

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 31^st, 2022 at 8:37pm by Panther »

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40938	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #310 - May 31^st, 2022 at 8:34pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Mortdooley

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6991
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #311 - May 31^st, 2022 at 10:43pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 31^st, 2022 at 8:34pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2456/zwjmRE.jpg

Roll Eyes

Quill pen, parchment and horse drawn cart was the internet of that time also. Affix your comments to a post in the Town Square or catch up with the times. The Americans of 1776 were better armed then the British Army and had better tactics. There is no reason for that to change! When you continue to look in the wrong place for solutions, you never get the results you claim to want.

Back to top

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40938	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #312 - May 31^st, 2022 at 10:47pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Mortdooley Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6991 Texas Gulf Coast Gender:	Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜ Reply #313 - May 31^st, 2022 at 11:01pm Brian Ross wrote on May 31^st, 2022 at 10:47pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2456/zwjmRE.jpg If the AR platform had just used wood instead of plastic it wouldn't look so deadly and frightening.
Back to top	The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling. IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male

Re: ⮞⮞ Nullification of US Gun Law ⮜⮜
Reply #314 - May 31^st, 2022 at 11:25pm

Mortdooley wrote on May 31^st, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 31^st, 2022 at 10:47pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2456/zwjmRE.jpg

Roll Eyes

If the AR platform had just used wood instead of plastic it wouldn't look so deadly and frightening.

The problem is far from the look. The high velocity projectile is made to kill people. It rips people to pieces, it blows holes in people or it basically explodes people.

No it's not about looking deadly - it is deadly. The perfect weapon if you set out to kill 19 children. Not much good for anything else.

Back to top

IP Logged