Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 8
Send Topic Print
Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data (Read 36412 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
May 25th, 2021 at 7:03pm
 
You would be hard pressed to find a climate skeptic these days who is not a complete moron, a dedicated liar, or both. A popular lie is the claim that measured temperature data does not match predictions, usually accompanied by a plot comparing predicted average global surface temperature with measured temperatures from somewhere else, such as the ocean, the tropics, the troposphere etc. These plots often look like they were produced by a primary school student being taught to use microsoft excel, with the data stopping about a decade ago. Pointing out the obvious flaws does not seem to help, they have an endless supply of slightly different versions of the same lie.

This is what you get when you compare predicted average global surface temperature with measured average global surface temperature:

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-fut
ure-warming-projections-right/

...

Here is Ajax comparing the tropics with the global average, and in the same post comparing lower troposphere temperatures with surface temperatures.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/26#26

Here is Lee comparing ocean temperatures with predicted air temperatures:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/24#24

Here is Lee comparing troposphere temperatures with surface temperatures, and trying to avoid providing the source:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/1#1

Here is Lee comparing predictions with measured lower troposphere temperatures. The graph also shows a separate line with different measured data for the surface temperature:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/17#17

Here is Lee arguing that it is valid to compare surface temperatures with lower troposphere measurements, because the lower troposphere is “where we live”.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/33#33

Here is Lee providing another graph highlighting the difference between the lower troposphere and the surface:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/13#13

Here is Lee comparing surface temperatures with mid troposphere measurements:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/19#19
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 25th, 2021 at 7:08pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #1 - May 25th, 2021 at 7:20pm
 
https://www.ecowatch.com/worlds-largest-iceberg-breaks-antarctica-2653093274.htm...

yet the science says this is normal and has nothing to do with GW.. Undecided Undecided how do they know which is which?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #2 - May 25th, 2021 at 7:27pm
 
cods wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 7:20pm:
https://www.ecowatch.com/worlds-largest-iceberg-breaks-antarctica-2653093274.htm...

yet the science says this is normal and has nothing to do with GW.. Undecided Undecided how do they know which is which?


Both are true. It is normal, but would also be affected in some way by changes in temperature.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17290
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #3 - May 25th, 2021 at 7:29pm
 
Poor petal. Fancy trying to convince people an average of an ensemble (many) models is somehow proof that they are correct. Only one model can be correct.

freediver wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 7:03pm:
Here is Lee arguing that it is valid to compare surface temperatures with lower troposphere measurements, because the lower troposphere is “where we live”.


Yes the one that NASA, climate morons that they are, endorse.

"The National Space Development Agency of Japan (NASDA) provided AMSR-E to NASA as an indispensable part of Aqua's global hydrology mission. Over the oceans, AMSR-E is measuring a number of important geophysical parameters, including sea surface temperature (SST), wind speed, atmospheric water vapor, cloud water, and rain rate. "

https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/AMSRE-REMSS-L2P-v7a

Wow. Not only SST's Water vapour and rain. Wink

"Our yearly summer school focuses on the topic of "Using Satellite Observations to Advance Climate Models". Students will explore how satellite observations can be used to evaluate and improve climate models, and will hear from a range of speakers on climate model diagnostics and evaluation and remote sensing of the planet."

https://climatesciences.jpl.nasa.gov/events/31/

Maybe you should check NASA's Climate Kids site. It's only slightly above your level of understanding.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 25th, 2021 at 7:34pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #4 - May 25th, 2021 at 9:45pm
 
lee wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 7:29pm:
Poor petal. Fancy trying to convince people an average of an ensemble (many) models is somehow proof that they are correct. Only one model can be correct.

freediver wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 7:03pm:
Here is Lee arguing that it is valid to compare surface temperatures with lower troposphere measurements, because the lower troposphere is “where we live”.


Yes the one that NASA, climate morons that they are, endorse.

"The National Space Development Agency of Japan (NASDA) provided AMSR-E to NASA as an indispensable part of Aqua's global hydrology mission. Over the oceans, AMSR-E is measuring a number of important geophysical parameters, including sea surface temperature (SST), wind speed, atmospheric water vapor, cloud water, and rain rate. "

https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/AMSRE-REMSS-L2P-v7a

Wow. Not only SST's Water vapour and rain. Wink

"Our yearly summer school focuses on the topic of "Using Satellite Observations to Advance Climate Models". Students will explore how satellite observations can be used to evaluate and improve climate models, and will hear from a range of speakers on climate model diagnostics and evaluation and remote sensing of the planet."

https://climatesciences.jpl.nasa.gov/events/31/

Maybe you should check NASA's Climate Kids site. It's only slightly above your level of understanding.


Are you trying to make a point Lee?

I was not criticising you for using satellite data. I was criticising you for being full of crap. If you took your thermometer to the beach to measure the water temperature, or used a balloon to measure the troposphere temperature, and compared that with the predicted surface temperature, you would be just as full of crap.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102881
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #5 - May 25th, 2021 at 9:53pm
 
Hi FD,
would you be open to the idea that average temperatures
can normally go up and down 1 to 2 degrees
over periods of centuries?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #6 - May 26th, 2021 at 5:26pm
 
Bobby. wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 9:53pm:
Hi FD,
would you be open to the idea that average temperatures
can normally go up and down 1 to 2 degrees
over periods of centuries?


They can go up and down that much in a few minutes.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17290
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #7 - May 26th, 2021 at 9:08pm
 
freediver wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 9:45pm:
I was not criticising you for using satellite data.


Oh yes you were. Lying again when caught out.

[quote author=freediver link=1619599858/6#6 date=1619608874]I see now why you were so embarrassed to post the link - it is based on measured troposphere data, ie up to 18km high. [/quote]

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 44432
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #8 - May 26th, 2021 at 9:17pm
 
freediver wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 7:03pm:
You would be hard pressed to find a climate skeptic these days who is not a complete moron, a dedicated liar, or both. A popular lie is the claim that measured temperature data does not match predictions, usually accompanied by a plot comparing predicted average global surface temperature with measured temperatures from somewhere else, such as the ocean, the tropics, the troposphere etc. These plots often look like they were produced by a primary school student being taught to use microsoft excel, with the data stopping about a decade ago. Pointing out the obvious flaws does not seem to help, they have an endless supply of slightly different versions of the same lie.

This is what you get when you compare predicted average global surface temperature with measured average global surface temperature:

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-fut
ure-warming-projections-right/

[url]https://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/2
299_Updated_CMIP3_Model_Comparisons_Hindcast_Forecast_20210122.JPG[/url]

Here is Ajax comparing the tropics with the global average, and in the same post comparing lower troposphere temperatures with surface temperatures.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/26#26

Here is Lee comparing ocean temperatures with predicted air temperatures:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/24#24

Here is Lee comparing troposphere temperatures with surface temperatures, and trying to avoid providing the source:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/1#1

Here is Lee comparing predictions with measured lower troposphere temperatures. The graph also shows a separate line with different measured data for the surface temperature:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/17#17

Here is Lee arguing that it is valid to compare surface temperatures with lower troposphere measurements, because the lower troposphere is “where we live”.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/33#33

Here is Lee providing another graph highlighting the difference between the lower troposphere and the surface:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/13#13

Here is Lee comparing surface temperatures with mid troposphere measurements:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/19#19

Wow!  Modelling 0.5 degrees, over 50 years, across the entite globe.

China, do somefin'!!!

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102881
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #9 - May 26th, 2021 at 10:33pm
 
freediver wrote on May 26th, 2021 at 5:26pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 9:53pm:
Hi FD,
would you be open to the idea that average temperatures
can normally go up and down 1 to 2 degrees
over periods of centuries?


They can go up and down that much in a few minutes.



I am talking about average global temperatures -
isn't that what you're talking about?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #10 - May 27th, 2021 at 5:31pm
 
Quote:
Wow!  Modelling 0.5 degrees, over 50 years, across the entite globe.


You are confused.

Bobby. wrote on May 26th, 2021 at 10:33pm:
freediver wrote on May 26th, 2021 at 5:26pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 9:53pm:
Hi FD,
would you be open to the idea that average temperatures
can normally go up and down 1 to 2 degrees
over periods of centuries?


They can go up and down that much in a few minutes.



I am talking about average global temperatures -
isn't that what you're talking about?


Sure.

If you are trying to make a point Bobby, try making it. I'm not going to do your homework for you.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17290
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #11 - May 27th, 2021 at 9:44pm
 
*
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10975
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #12 - May 29th, 2021 at 11:46am
 
freediver wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 7:03pm:
You would be hard pressed to find a climate skeptic these days who is not a complete moron, a dedicated liar, or both. A popular lie is the claim that measured temperature data does not match predictions, usually accompanied by a plot comparing predicted average global surface temperature with measured temperatures from somewhere else, such as the ocean, the tropics, the troposphere etc. These plots often look like they were produced by a primary school student being taught to use microsoft excel, with the data stopping about a decade ago. Pointing out the obvious flaws does not seem to help, they have an endless supply of slightly different versions of the same lie.

This is what you get when you compare predicted average global surface temperature with measured average global surface temperature:

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-fut
ure-warming-projections-right/

[url]https://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/2
299_Updated_CMIP3_Model_Comparisons_Hindcast_Forecast_20210122.JPG[/url]

Here is Ajax comparing the tropics with the global average, and in the same post comparing lower troposphere temperatures with surface temperatures.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/26#26

Here is Lee comparing ocean temperatures with predicted air temperatures:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/24#24

Here is Lee comparing troposphere temperatures with surface temperatures, and trying to avoid providing the source:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/1#1

Here is Lee comparing predictions with measured lower troposphere temperatures. The graph also shows a separate line with different measured data for the surface temperature:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/17#17

Here is Lee arguing that it is valid to compare surface temperatures with lower troposphere measurements, because the lower troposphere is “where we live”.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/33#33

Here is Lee providing another graph highlighting the difference between the lower troposphere and the surface:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619599858/13#13

Here is Lee comparing surface temperatures with mid troposphere measurements:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1619147859/19#19


No wonder you're a sheep..... Kiss

...

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2017/07/warming-in-the-tropics-even-the-new-rss-sate...

...

Quote:
In terms of the linear temperature trends since 1979, Fig. 2 shows that 2 of the top-cited ocean temperature datasets have warming trends near the bottom of the range of climate model simulations.


...

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/05/05/more-crowd-sourcing-please/
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2021 at 12:02pm by Ajax »  

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #13 - May 29th, 2021 at 12:49pm
 
Thanks Ajax, they are great examples of the absolute crap that the climate "skeptics" want normal people to take seriously. Have you figured out why yet, or are you still confused?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102881
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Climate “skeptics” lie: measured temperature data
Reply #14 - May 29th, 2021 at 12:51pm
 
freediver wrote on May 27th, 2021 at 5:31pm:
Quote:
Wow!  Modelling 0.5 degrees, over 50 years, across the entite globe.


You are confused.

Bobby. wrote on May 26th, 2021 at 10:33pm:
freediver wrote on May 26th, 2021 at 5:26pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 25th, 2021 at 9:53pm:
Hi FD,
would you be open to the idea that average temperatures
can normally go up and down 1 to 2 degrees
over periods of centuries?


They can go up and down that much in a few minutes.



I am talking about average global temperatures -
isn't that what you're talking about?


Sure.

If you are trying to make a point Bobby, try making it. I'm not going to do your homework for you.



My point is that such small changes could be normal
and have nothing to do with the CO2 we are creating.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 8
Send Topic Print