Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
So why are journalists not covering it?" (Read 1486 times)
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #15 - May 31st, 2021 at 5:14pm
 
Yadda wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 4:48pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 4:33pm:

you seem to be confused yadda (and abusive).

Invermectin isn't the malaria drug it's a drug for parasites.


The malaria one was hydroxychloroquine

Let further abuse begin I guess

Spot




Spot,

You are mistaken.

WWW search....
Ivermectin and malaria control



Will you concede, that information about Ivermectin's use [for many decades], is correct ?

Let further abuse begin I guess.





why would i concede when you offered no actual information or a link? i did. did you follow mine?

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96767
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #16 - May 31st, 2021 at 9:35pm
 
Bobby. wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 4:30pm:
Karnal wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 4:27pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 2:53pm:
Karnal wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 2:49pm:
There you go, A. A media/government conspiracy to keep covid patients dying.

It all makes sense.

Cheers.




51 infections now -
of the killer Indian Covid mutant -
we're doomed.


Don't spread it around, Bobby. Otherwise they'll call it the Melbourne virus.

Gordon won't be able to call it the killer Curry virus anymore.



Did u see the video?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Jak9wBBcF68D/


No, Bobby, it's on Bitchute.

Put it in the Guardian, okay?

Oh, that's right, they're not touching it.

So unfair, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96767
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #17 - May 31st, 2021 at 9:37pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 4:33pm:
you seem to be confused yadda (and abusive). Invermectin isn't the malaria drug it's a drug for parasites. The malaria one was hydroxychloroquine

Let further abuse begin I guess

Spot


It's a vetinary drug.

No worries, Y will be promoting Angel Dust next.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #18 - Jun 1st, 2021 at 9:52am
 
Another thread of this waste of time and money?
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21939
A cat with a view
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #19 - Jun 1st, 2021 at 11:33am
 


All of you naysayers, i have only one piece of advice for you;

Read the article and the testimonies in that article.

If you feel that you can afford to neglect to inform yourself [on this issue and on others],
well, that is OK as well.

Dictionary;
testimony = =
1 a formal statement, especially one given in a court of law.    a solemn protest or declaration.
2 evidence or proof of something.



Dictionary;
simpleton = = a foolish or gullible person.



.



Quote:

The Drug that Cracked COVID


May 01, 2021
By Michael Capuzzo

[the whole article]
......
......

https://www.mountainhomemag.com/2021/05/01/356270/the-drug-that-cracked-covid



WWW search....
the drug that cracked covid
Capuzzo, "The Drug That Cracked Covid"
"I Don't Know of a Bigger Story in the World" Right Now




.



snippets...

Quote:

......

In Charlottesville, Virginia, Dr. David Chesler, an internist/geriatrician for forty-four years with hundreds of COVID-19 patients in six nursing homes, wrote to Dr. Fauci, telling him essentially that he had found the early treatment Fauci was urgently looking for. Dr. Chesler explained that facing the choice with his elderly COVID-19 patients to “either provide my patients with the standard of care, basically first aid, with Tylenol, oxygen and monitoring, until they became sick enough to be sent to the hospital, or to try something more proactive with the hope of the patients not becoming so ill and then losing their lives,” he had since successfully treated “over 200 high-risk COVID patients” with Ivermectin, many over 100 years old, with none dying or needing “heroic” oxygen support. Fauci never replied.

Everywhere the problem was the same, Kory said. The WHO, NIH, and other public health agencies were suddenly recommending only COVID-19 therapies proven by the “gold standard” of large randomized controlled trials of treatment and placebo groups, which were powerful but had several limiting flaws, including the fact that they took months to complete and cost ten to twenty million dollars that only big pharmaceutical companies could afford. They had thrown out all the other time-tested forms of clinical and scientific medical investigation still taught in all the medical schools, such as observational trials (which had eliminated widespread crib death), case histories, and anecdotes. They also restricted the use of essential off-label and generic drugs with blatant disinformation campaigns that reminded Kory of big tobacco’s efforts to hide the dangers of smoking. In effect, the public health authorities eliminated the full toolbox of essential scientific methods and drugs that doctors use every day, including the most effective early, prophylactic, and late-stage treatments for COVID-19, which were developed by frontline doctors, not pharmaceutical companies.


......The doctor is morally compelled to use their best clinical judgement and the “best available evidence” in that instant, not tomorrow or next year when more data is published. As the WMA puts it: “The health of my patient will be my first consideration.” Clearly the medical establishment is now routinely violating that ancient oath, Kory says, and as a result he “feels estranged from most, but not all, of my colleagues.”

.......

In the new world of medicine, the COVID world, he says, “Only big randomized controlled trials by big pharma/big academic medical centers are accepted by big journals, while others are rejected,” while only studies in big journals are accepted by big public health agencies for drug recommendations, and only drugs recommended by big public health agencies “escape media/social media censorship.”

......

“This leaves you with a system where the only thing that’s considered to have sufficient evidence or proven efficacy is essentially a big new pharmaceutical drug,” he adds. “If it doesn’t come from the mountaintop, it doesn’t exist,” Kory says. “The people on the ground, we cannot do any more science that’s considered credible. We’re discredited as controversial and as promoting unproven therapies and our Facebook groups are shut down, Twitter accounts are locked, YouTube videos are removed and demonetized. It’s really almost totalitarian what’s happening when we’re just well-meaning scientists trying to do the right thing by our patients.”

As Kory left the Senate hearing room that morning in December after his Ivermectin testimony, his face was dark with disgust. The hearing was dead before it started. When Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin (with whom Kory decidedly shares no political sympathies) called the hearing on early COVID-19 treatments, The New York Times ran an advance story eviscerating it as a panel of anti-science kooks promoting “fringe theories,” a “forum for amplifying dubious theories and questionable treatments pushed by President Trump,” including hydroxychloroquine. The hearing was boycotted by all seven Democrats (who have received a total of $1.3 million in big pharma bucks from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Gilead, and others), and four of the seven Republicans, including Utah’s Mitt Romney (more than $3 million received from big pharma), Ohio’s Rob Portman ($542,400), and Florida’s Rick Scott (more than $1 million in stock in Gilead Sciences, maker of Remdesivir).


......




Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #20 - Jun 1st, 2021 at 11:56am
 
Anecdotes. Not evidence.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21939
A cat with a view
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #21 - Jun 1st, 2021 at 12:17pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 1st, 2021 at 11:56am:

Anecdotes.

Not evidence.



Let it be likewise spoken to you, when, one day, you require an urgent, life-saving solution.


.


And there are 'anecdotes', of people on their 'deathbed' with COVID, who are then given Ivermectin as a treatment,
and then have rapidly recovered, and regained their well being.


.


"It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
- Professor Dumbledore - Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets




Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #22 - Jun 1st, 2021 at 12:22pm
 
Yadda wrote on Jun 1st, 2021 at 12:17pm:
.


And there are 'anecdotes', of people on their 'deathbed' with COVID, who are then given Ivermectin as a treatment,
and then have rapidly recovered, and regained their well being.






Which being anecdotes aren't convincing evidence of effectiveness.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #23 - Jun 6th, 2021 at 11:36am
 
Yadda wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 1:06am:

"So why are journalists not covering it?"





You mean like this from April 2021

Quote:
Ivermectin: why a potential COVID treatment isn’t recommended for use

As the search continues for treatments for COVID-19, the results from a number of studies have led to changes in the advice on which drugs to give people who are suffering from the disease.

The European Medicines Agency and the United States National Institutes of Health have recently stated that one previously promising treatment – the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin – is not recommended for use in routine management of COVID-19 patients.

Despite these decisions, support for ivermectin has been circulating on social media and in WhatsApp groups, with rumours abounding that the drug is being blocked on purpose. Some have dubbed it the “new hydroxycholoroquine”, after a treatment that received a significant amount of online support but was found in trials to be ineffective against COVID-19.
Why isn’t it recommended?

While some other studies did appear to show benefits of ivermectin, many did not. These were summarised by the National Institutes of Health, showing severe limitations arising from small sample sizes and problems with study design.

Both the National Institutes of Health and the European Medicines Agency judged, on the basis of these studies, that there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of ivermectin in treatment of COVID-19.

https://theconversation.com/ivermectin-why-a-potential-covid-treatment-isnt-reco...


It's kind of ironic that the same people rejecting a vaccine are also promoting treatments that are experimental and have insufficient evidence that they work.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96767
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #24 - Jun 9th, 2021 at 2:35pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 6th, 2021 at 11:36am:
Yadda wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 1:06am:

"So why are journalists not covering it?"





You mean like this from April 2021

Quote:
Ivermectin: why a potential COVID treatment isn’t recommended for use

As the search continues for treatments for COVID-19, the results from a number of studies have led to changes in the advice on which drugs to give people who are suffering from the disease.

The European Medicines Agency and the United States National Institutes of Health have recently stated that one previously promising treatment – the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin – is not recommended for use in routine management of COVID-19 patients.

Despite these decisions, support for ivermectin has been circulating on social media and in WhatsApp groups, with rumours abounding that the drug is being blocked on purpose. Some have dubbed it the “new hydroxycholoroquine”, after a treatment that received a significant amount of online support but was found in trials to be ineffective against COVID-19.
Why isn’t it recommended?

While some other studies did appear to show benefits of ivermectin, many did not. These were summarised by the National Institutes of Health, showing severe limitations arising from small sample sizes and problems with study design.

Both the National Institutes of Health and the European Medicines Agency judged, on the basis of these studies, that there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of ivermectin in treatment of COVID-19.

https://theconversation.com/ivermectin-why-a-potential-covid-treatment-isnt-reco...


It's kind of ironic that the same people rejecting a vaccine are also promoting treatments that are experimental and have insufficient evidence that they work.



No no, Y means like that, from his own post:

Yadda wrote on May 31st, 2021 at 1:06am:

"So why are journalists not covering it?"




I would offer.....
     The MSM, for many years, have had no interest in informing the pubic of apparent truth [if that truth would upset the partisan, political agendas of their own masters].
     
     Today, those who control the MSM, see their function [and their 'opportunity'], primarily, as influencers of pubic opinion, and see their own material and partisan political interests, as of paramount importance.
     
     Trump Derangement Syndrome.
     
     Protecting associated vested interests.



.


IMAGE.....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2MNY-KXMAkL0pD?format=png&name=900x900

LINK....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2MNY-KXMAkL0pD?format=png&name=900x900


.


Quote:

“I Don’t Know of a Bigger Story in the World” Right Now Than Ivermectin:
NY Times Best-Selling Author


May 25, 2021
by Nick Corbishley

So why are journalists not covering it?

Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled
“The Drug That Cracked Covid”.


The 15-page article chronicles the gargantuan struggle being waged by frontline doctors on all continents to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment,
as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them.


......

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/05/i-dont-know-of-a-bigger-story-in-the-wor...



.


Quote:

The Drug that Cracked COVID


May 01, 2021
By Michael Capuzzo

[the whole article]
......
......

https://www.mountainhomemag.com/2021/05/01/356270/the-drug-that-cracked-covid



WWW search....
the drug that cracked covid
Capuzzo, "The Drug That Cracked Covid"
"I Don't Know of a Bigger Story in the World" Right Now




WWW search....
"Ivermectin", the drug that saved the life of donald trump

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2021/05/29/ivermectin-the-drug-that-cracked...




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #25 - Jun 9th, 2021 at 2:42pm
 
Ivermectin has been proposed potentially for malaria, but hasn't actually been prescribed in  large amounts.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: So why are journalists not covering it?"
Reply #26 - Jun 12th, 2021 at 10:19am
 
Ever since the oligarchy took over most if not all industries including drugs and medicine, then science no longer works for the betterment of humanity, it works for that hand full that provides its finances.

This is also true about ivermectin, my doctor told me that this is an acceptable treatment yet our government has told doctors not to prescribe it to people who are sick with covid-19.

Big Pharma through the united nations directs the treatment of covid-19 and many other diseases like cancer etc etc.

They fabricate the so called gold standard and then everyone has to follow otherwise they will be prosecuted.

Many front line doctors around the world are calling for the use of ivermectin now doesn't that tell you something...?!?!

OR have people just become so stupid they will do anything the authorities recommend.

Governments around the world are deliberately banning the use of invermectin choosing to listen to the WHO and other oligarchical infested institutes.

Scientific institutes no longer works for the betterment of humanity, science has been enslaved by the oligarchy who now control every facet of science and polluted science with politics.

There are many examples staring you in the face if only you care to look more closely, nothing is hidden its all out in the open but people have more important things to do.

That's why we have reached a stage were it will be impossible for our grand children to buy a house.

The middle class is slowly dying.

We cannot tell if the warming of the Earth is responsible for the crazy weather we are experiencing or all the
geo-engineering projects that are happening in many countries around the world.

AND

Many other things which today we accept as normal.



Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print