wombatwoody wrote on Sep 28
th, 2021 at 6:06pm:
Fuqqing hell!!!!!
Wombat, did you, as I just did, watch that entire discussion between the suspended Lawyer Powell and that fifth rate blogger idiot?
Gawd.
Lots of noise from both about a stolen election, contrived rubbish about de-certifying the election outcome, a suggestion of inviting the SCOTUS to find a solution (they would not even allow that concept to be announced in that Court...."Ya 'Onors, this is bad, so because I am standing here asking, and thus you better give me the result I want") and yet again, not one scintilla evidence offered. Just Tweedledum tweeting to Tweedledee.
And best of all.....this farcical circus occurred well after Powell walked out on an ABC interview on the basis that she was constrained against talking about the present litigation, and there she is, the idiot.....talking about that very litigation!
1. It seems the only way Powell can now get a voice is through this numpty's TV blog. He is a fruit cake, just like she is. She once was the darling of Fox, and obviously, they have shut the door on her, and for very obvious good reason. So, now she goes to this guy's basement studio. It does not work. No-one wins legal cases in the media. Powell is a fruit loop, yet erudite bullshitter. Talking total rubbish, and doing it well. Sounds great to the lay people, but gets nowhere where it counts, in Court.
2. Note....a new term. 'Lawfare.' WTF is that? It does not exist in any legal lexicon, but there ya go. Typical Humpty garbage. Give something, which is a nothing, a name so it suddenly becomes a something. Bloody Hell.....try that in a real Court and demand you win because your opponent is engaging in 'Lawfare.'
Crap.