Let's say a white police officer killed a black man who did nothing wrong. Unlike George Floyd, this man had not committed any crime, did not resist arrest, didn't have fentanyl in his system and had no record of violent crime. Assume this poor guy was a law-abiding, taxpaying, churchgoing American and that the cop killed him for the crime of "driving while black."

How do the police react? They say the shooting was righteous. They refuse to investigate. There is bodycam footage, but they refuse to release it. And get this: They refuse to allow anyone to even talk about it. If any cop talks about it, he loses his job. If anyone in the black community talks about it, social media will suspend them or ban them for life.

What would all of that mean to you? Guilty as charged, right? The police must be covering up a crime. No one who's innocent acts like that, right?

Guess what? That's equivalent to the reaction (or, should I say, overreaction) of liberals, Democrats and assorted socialists and communists when Republicans make accusations of massive voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

I thought we're all allowed to have our opinion in America. I thought we have free speech. I thought we have a right to investigate. I thought we have a right to see the videotapes. I thought we have a right to forensic audits.

I was wrong.

The fix is in. It's crystal clear to me now that not only was the election rigged but so is everything post-election. It's simple psychology. Just look at the absurd reaction, or overreaction, by Democrats.

[...]

Here are the questions I want answered.

        -- If Democrats didn't rig and steal the election, why are they so afraid of forensic audits in key battleground states, specifically the current audit in Arizona?
        -- When Trump was an 8-to-1 landslide favorite with bettors around the world late on election night and clearly headed toward a landslide electoral victory, why did five states suddenly announce they would pause counting for the night? And how come Biden was suddenly ahead by morning?
        -- How come Michigan apparently had a dump of 149,772 votes at 6:31 a.m. on Nov. 4, 96% of which went to Biden?
        -- How did Wisconsin count 149,520 votes for Biden from 3:26 to 3:44 a.m. on Nov. 4?
        -- How come Philadelphia vote counters were so desperate to keep witnesses out of the counting room? Why did they refuse entry to witnesses (to Republicans) until those witnesses had a court order in hand?
        -- Why were the windows in a vote-counting location in Detroit covered with cardboard so nobody (no Republican) could see inside?
        -- There are videotapes filmed in Detroit of vans pulling up in the middle of the night with what obviously look like boxes of ballots. In Atlanta, there are videotapes that clearly show ballot containers appearing at a vote-counting location after a fake water main break was used to force all GOP witnesses out of the counting room. Why can't we discuss these videotapes?
        -- How come Twitter banned me for life over mentioning these videotapes?
        -- How come the Arizona Senate's liaison for the vote audit says Maricopa County hasn't complied with the subpoena by turning over passwords to Dominion voting machines?
        -- How come the Biden DOJ suddenly wants to stop the Arizona audit?

https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2021/05/09/heres-how-you-know-dem...

I mean the right call the left snowfkakes. The amount of whining about the election is staggeruing.

The type of quality source I've come to expect from you wombat

wombatwoody wrote on Jun 1^st, 2021 at 9:08pm:


Wait hold my breath for any actual evidence either

Quote:


Trump was never 8 to 1 favourite.

States did not pause counting for the night.

Biden was not in front in the morning.

Quote:


https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-vote-spikes-mi-wi-idUSKBN27L...

Quote:


There was an error - it was fixed. Still posting the same old disproven junk.

Jesus. Do you believe there were dinosaurs on Noah's Ark too? The lengths that people go to defend their beliefs ....

Quote:


Jerome Marcus, a lawyer for the campaign, told Judge Paul Diamond "there's a non-zero number of people in the room."

Then the republican appointed Judge threw the case out.

i.e. you can not open a legal case based on watchers not being allowed in the room and then admit that watchers were allowed in the room and expect the case to go any further.