Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jul 3
rd, 2021 at 11:32pm:
Heeey - I started the comparison with Nazi Germany... how come North gets all the credit? We are on the same page, and I think he has studied more of it than I have... but then....
It was me who first mooted the concept that once the Sudeten Chinese question was resolved, Chancellor Xi would have no further territorial claims in Asia...... a clear comparison with the Sudeten German thing created by the Nazis.... that also included the Chinese 'persecuted' in Malaysia etc... and then the 'right of free passage' of Chinese troops etc*, which is bearing fruit with the base(s) being built in
Cambo etc.
Ages ago... I think before North got here ... credit where credit is due....
*a very old concept wherein a powerful armed nation says to a neighbour - we only want to cross your territory so we can have at the neighbour beyond you... meaning we will live like locusts off your land while crossing... and unless you agree we'll do it anyway and maybe more.....
It's in Shakespeare's Hamlet - Fortinbras (Strong Arm)... smart guy Shakespeare... Hamlet kills the new king who killed his father, then dies himself, leaving this armed force on Danish territory... wonder who would be taking the crown, eh?
It's OK, Graps... You can take the credit! I'm good with that! Although it's a bit like arguing 'Who's on first...'.
All imperialist and expansionist potentates prefer moral justification to invade territory, otherwise it's hard to galvanise support within the military, and the people, to go to war.
But the signs were always there from the beginning...
Xi intends to be 'the Great Helmsman' (like Mao, although he intends to eclipse him in ambition) and rule an expanded China as an absolute emperor. Hitler became 'Der Führer', borrowed from Mussolini's 'Il Duce' and Ioseb Besarionis dzе Jughashvili became 'Stalin' and 'Vozhd'.
All had ambitions of territorial gain. Dictators have no choice... Their slogan has to be 'war all the time' or their reason-for-being becomes moot.
To do that, they need to maintain a sense of moral 'outrage' and sense of superiority, imbued into those they rule absolutely, against 'the other' (e.g.. the 'foreign devil', 'untermenschen') under a singular (yet irrelevant) ideology.
Xi intends to cement his totalitarian regime within the next year, which will include: total suppression of any residual dissent, the purging and murder of remaining opponents, a further regimentising and surveillance of the Chinese people, and subjugation of the world (he's like Hitler and Stalin in that respect).
Expect Mao-style purges, more abusive posturing against other nations and the demonising of 'foreigners' - which won't be hard in China as the notion of 'foreign devils' is well established.
Finally, 1935 has another significance... It was the year before an Olympic Games for Hitler, as 2021 is for Xi... If key countries boycott the 2022 Winter Olympics (as they didn't in 1936), it will be a sign to Xi that the democratic world is seriously united against the Chinese regime (this is likely the current motivation for Xi to order his 'wolf wankers' to 'tone it down a bit'; as Hitler and Goebbels did in 1935).