John Smith wrote on Aug 7
th, 2021 at 7:30pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 7
th, 2021 at 3:26pm:
John, there are links between sexual abuse and weight LOSS, too
there probably is. However that is irrelevant to the point you tried to make where you claimed that someone who put on weight couldn't have been sexually abused. You were wrong and no amount of deflection will change that.
The actual hell? I did not say that. You do not know what the actual mindset of Higgins right at this moment, or what it was between the time between her alleged rape and today. The likelihood that Higgins had put on weight is likely due to her change of diet. She very well might have a bit of self-hatred. Higgins might well have lied about her rape. Perhaps she is trying to convince herself that she is really wrong and does not want to go ahead with her accusation. Because an actual convinced rape victim would have no issues about whether or not she is raped. The complaint would have been made in a reasonable time. I figure Brittany is in a lot of doubt about her place in society and that she regrets that she did not act in a timely manner. Otherwise, I would so far *guess* that Higgins is getting pressured into making a false complaint, based on some kind of technicality about not being able to consent to sex if you are drunk.
I would love to investigate further now the issue surrounding the rape allegation. The security guard's interview was hardly convincing that a rape had happened.
UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 7
th, 2021 at 3:26pm:
Yeah, I know. Because I have a more intermediate to advanced knowledge of psychology.
Quote:Based on your comments, I'd say you have zero knowledge
No, based on my comments, I seem to have a much better grasp on psychology than you could have had in your entire life. I may well have had about 20 years of casual study into the subjects of body language, psychology, motivation, etc. But, it is likely much more than most people here.
UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 7
th, 2021 at 3:26pm:
I, on the other hand, get successful relationships with women because I am good at it.
Quote:if you were 'good at it' you'd actually be able to keep a relationship.
Oh, so I am not good at a relationship because I am not in one? Well, you do not know my circumstances. And seeing as I am not allowed to divulge information about my life, I think I can safely say that I have had many constructive relationships with ladies aged between 18 and 50 years of age.
UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 7
th, 2021 at 3:26pm:
You need your wife to prepare the easiest meal of the day?
Quote:I don't 'need' my wife to do anything. She does it because she chooses to. See, today she prepared my wheatbix, I made her hamburgers. Not because she 'needed' me too, she is quite capable of making her own. If you were as good at relationships as you pretend to be you'd know that it's nothing to do with need.
The whole issue is that the preparation for making cornflakes is to have a bowl, cornflakes, milk, and a spoon. Pour the cornflakes into the bowl. Pour the milk in. Get the spoon and shovel those cornflakes into the mouth. Having a wife do that for you is like having someone cut up your meat at the dinner table. I figure your whole point was to say that you think you are so dominant in the relationship that your wife wants to make sure she is loyal to you to keep you.
As far as I am concerned, my relationships have been a matter of wanting to connect with someone else on an emotional level. And if I can connect on an emotional level things can progress from there. But, for now, I am in a situation where I have the insight that I have a bit of an antisocial attitude. So, I do not want to burden people with my problems until I can get them sorted. It does not mean that I am no good at them. My daughters can see that I can be a good father. Just that I need to be focused on myself for now.
Forum
Pages: 
