Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 12^th, 2021 at 2:42am:


The police and prosecutor determined there was enough evidence to charge this bloke with rape you dickhead not me....You are sprouting off bullshit racist crap as usual to defend your ignorance and stupidity....Typical butt hurt racist white supremist behaviour....As you have no idea what evidence the Prosecution have it is you who is making baseless assumptions to support your crap not me....Your rants are full of racist comments that say more about you than those you chose to denigrate....You are a disgusting piece of crap Grappler with reality!!!

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2021 at 9:19pm:

Morrison initiated the investigation. Legal advice says it may impede the Higgins alleged rape trial, sounds like standard procedure and out of Morrison's control.

Aussie wrote on Aug 31^st, 2021 at 3:44pm:

In your link is states the decision was based on legal advice.

I can see if all of this blows up in the media it could impede the trial, and given the medias track record it would go against the accused.

John Smith wrote on Aug 31^st, 2021 at 4:33pm:

In your opinion.  He initiated it and then put a stop to it.

Maybe he rooted Higgins as well!

John Smith wrote on Aug 31^st, 2021 at 5:36pm:

Classic case of damned if you do damned if you don't, bear in mind Higgins was called out by the top brass as being a lying cow.

The charged rapist walks free because Brittany has nothing but her say so.
She looks a bit slutty to me.

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 12^th, 2021 at 9:34am:


A charge is not a guarantee of conviction or guilt - UNLESS you are an Ayatollah in Iran or somewhere similar - though our 'legal system' has always been weighted against the accused and 'magistrates' definitely work on the same values as Ayatollahs do, contrary to the Rule of OUR Law... you see, unlike the Ayatollah, we don't have the privilege of total belief that Allah will sort out any wrong done to someone charged, so convicting and executing them 'just in case they are guilty' doesn't quite work the same way.

Are you a God Believer and think that any wrong done to any individual will be resolved in Heaven?  If not - why do you support kangaroo court convictions based on accusation only without compelling evidence?

As I said - the opportunity to gather convincing and possibly conclusive evidence was long gone by the time this issue ever arose.... and it is an undying principle of mine that any accusation must be supported by substantial evidence and cannot rely exclusively on versions of events.

You should know that, given that such a stance would obliterate many police claims, including traffic etc things... surely as a Niqqer-Lover over there you would have to agree with that principle...

Whatever you think about it, that is the letter of the law even if it is not adhered to in 'courts'... yet it must be adhered to even if it 'costs' the state money for reasons of basic principles and rights ... that is what we pay them for....

Get with it.

Quite frankly, using your standards, you are totally stupid, uneducated, uninformed, and a proto-Fascist who would love to see rights destroyed as long as it suits some idea of your own.  You obviously know nothing and have no real principles unless you can see benefit for your chosen groups... it is certainly not I who am the racist - the Hayne case had nothing to do with race, you dickhead.

Johnnie wrote on Aug 31^st, 2021 at 11:34pm:



No, no, no - I was commenting on Aussie's view that MorrisonCo was doing 'standard operating procedure' to stuff up any case.  Muddying the waters was a hallmark of this issue from Day One - Reporting Day... unlike - say - philperth, I have no way of knowing that any offence actually occurred, and I've already said a great dis-service was done in there not being immediate action.

Obviously phil is too stupid or too narrow-minded or too drunk to understand English and see that any charge requires proof.  I doubt he'll ever be on a jury with that kind of mentality. He simply does not understand that good Law benefits all.... how many of his beloved Kaffir would not go to prison if the full standards of law were upheld as regards evidence?  And yet he wants to hang this man because a woman made the claim.... sorry - not sufficient... it needs EVIDENCE... if this guy was one of his beloved Blacks, would he have the same standard and demand instant conviction?

HOWEVER - that does not mean that I should accept that the accused is guilty because of any charge... this is anathema to OUR law and must never be permitted under any circumstances.

No compelling substantial evidence - no conviction... that's the principle, and it is better that ten guilty persons go free than that one innocent hang... IF there is compelling evidence and it shows guilt, I've always said this guy should hang..... but we - dear phil and I - simply cannot judge.

Aussie was right about the Canberra Bastardry in action... that's what I was saying was good work...

I don't know whether Higgins was raped or not... what I do know is that any solid evidence was long gone before anything happened at all.  I've commented, months ago, on the lack of positive work by the 'security' staff, who obviously are/were 'in the loop' as regards night-time liaisons inside Parliament House... something I trust is now forbidden, and yet poor darkened phil thinks I'm gunning for St Britanny and that I hate Niqqers and such...

I just demand that Law be adhered to - and phil must realise that a charge is not positive proof of anything - and is not a conviction.

Given the recent history of these kinds of things, a verdict of 'guilty' will come about through emotion and not sense..... and for fear of a negative reaction if the Law is properly adhered to... sheilas marching in the streets, most of whom have zero idea what they are marching about - and so forth - and the cowards will all run.

Aussie's comments on Canberra Dastardliness are pretty right.  I commented on the apparent cover-up from Day One - that's for you, dopey phil... but St Brittany did her 'cause' no favours by not doing anything for days.... very like the Hayne case...

Learn to read, you racist semi-literate dick-head.

For the illiterate and stupid here - guilt by accusation will NOT become the law of this land even if the accuser is a woman or a black or something ..... I will go to war if it does, and that ain't pretty.