Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 5
th, 2021 at 5:26pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 5
th, 2021 at 2:46pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 5
th, 2021 at 1:39pm:
I was of the understanding that ministerial offices were not under direct video surveillance, and were sacred sites built on absolute trust... you can't have meetings recorded and details leaked.......
Perhaps not in the actual ministerial suite then, but there is ctv footage that the police have held on to. Also there may be other evidence that no one apart from the police know of.
Their entrances and their exits... none of which shows sexual intercourse.... and I cannot see where there is any available evidence that sexual intercourse even took place... those birds had long flown by the time any effort was made. Where is the stained dress... the torn vaginal wall... the deposits inside...
All there is, is security staff half-doing their job finding the woman either naked or half-naked on the couch, and Ms Higgins' totally inebriated recollection of waking up with him on top of her.
On a darker side - this is an extension of the feminist insanity that men should be convicted on accusation, regardless of hard evidence, and the fervent hope in pursuing this charge is that in the modern day and age, an unthinking jury will find guilt where no evidence indicates it, purely on the basis of their emotions and their feelings about 'poor victims'.
Men are now responsible for women's actions when drunk.
If a woman is drunk and has sexual intercourse with a man its his fault.
But if a man is drunk and a waman has sexual intercourse with the man ...its his fault.
If she drinks too much.....its his fault.
If she comes to his private room in a motel....its his fault.
If she decides that she didnt like it, or sees an opportunity for advancement....its his fault.
Women have been seducing men to take advantage of the situation for as long as human kind has existed.
Only now have they the ability to claim all manner of "abuses" years and even decades after the supposed act.
A rape is when the woman is taken unwillingly and reports it immediately.
Sexual assault is the same, if its not reported, there has to be some doubt.
We are now at the ludicrous stage when a man must gain both verbal and written acknowledgement of willing female participation in an act of love or sex, but even that will be open to interpretation eventually.
I can see a time when a man will have to have recorded evidence of willingness on the behalf of a woman (at various stages of coitus).
He will have to have blood samples of the female dated and retained as evidence that she is not drunk or drugged.
Written confirmation, with witness or witnesses.
The only safe male these days is a dole bludging male who has nothing any woman can get from him.
Forum
Pages: 
The Higgins allegations (Read 6464 times)
