Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 15^th, 2021 at 4:32pm:

So universal Western civilisation  is multiculturalism, invented 50 years ago.  Your idea? Looks more like a Bwianesque one.


Multiculturalism, it's a sham and it's bad for every country that embraces it.  If you want to see a lot of Muslims in one place, you fly to Araby and see them. Same with Bombay, Lahore, Shanghai, etc. Or look at US or UK cities with large black or Muslim populations, respectively. Harmony? No, seething resentment, tension, crime. Diversity is where nations go to die.


Brian is not a doctor of theology - that would be a PhD in an academic discipline. He is nowhere near capable for such an intellectual undertaking and he is demonstrably ignorant of basic theology, philosophy, history, literature - the things that would be needed for a real doctorate. He bought himself  an honorary doctor of divinity for boasting purposes. Like multiculturalism, he is a sham, too.

So which reward would you like - 10 rupees or a banana? Have two.

I think Blainey saw it 40 years ago.


All for Australia is a 1984 book by Australian historian Professor Geoffrey Blainey. It criticises Australian immigration policy and the direction in which it is pushing the country. The book examines the way policy developed in the 1970s and 1980s and explores what Blainey views as the disproportionately high levels of Asian immigration to Australia since the mid-1970s.

In All for Australia, Blainey argues:

For the sake of national unity, the typical nation practises discrimination against migrants on the basis of ethnicity. Ironically, the Asian countries that Australia is too afraid to "offend" have no hesitation in using that right to retain their current ethnic compositions.
Every nation relies on a sense of community belonging, which can easily be damaged by the rapid entry of foreign people who unintentionally erode national cohesion.
Immigration is one of the most important issues facing a nation. The notion that it is too contentious to be publicly debated makes a mockery of democracy.
Multiculturalism tends to emphasise the rights of ethnic minorities at the expense of the majority of Australians, thus unnecessarily encouraging division and threatening social cohesion.
The policy of multiculturalism has tended to be implicitly anti-British, despite Australia's British colonial heritage and the large number of British immigrants to Australia after World War II.
Australian immigration policy has moved from one extreme to another, from a policy that sought to encourage European immigration and restrict Asian immigration (White Australia policy) to a policy that now gives disproportionate preference to Asian immigration. Blainey asserts that the preferential treatment of Asian immigrants arose partly from a sense of guilt over the Vietnam War, but it also reflected Canberra's misguided view that more trade with Asian countries would come with a larger Asian population.

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 15^th, 2021 at 4:45pm:



Show us your DD, Bwian. Redact your name and show us the issuing institution, name of award, date.

Go on. Shame me for my 'jealousy '.

Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 15^th, 2021 at 6:47pm:



It's been slow and painful but eventually, grudgingly, it's flickering for you.

Three bananas. Go on.

Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 15^th, 2021 at 7:00pm:


Being a social worker, your livelihood depends on maintaining these multicultural, racialist victimhood pathologies, Anal. You are a parasite on social dysfunction - Aboriginal, efnic. They screw up their lives, you get paid. Causation.

Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 15^th, 2021 at 7:10pm:



You couldn't be this stupid and disjointed at the Parramatta Magistrates Court, so you bring your Bwianesque pathologies here.


Breathe into the paperbag.

Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 15^th, 2021 at 7:19pm:



Just roll your eyes and yawn - you are not any more coherent and articulate than that.  You have no control over your rampant associative thoughts, you are simply voicing a bunch of flies in a jar. 

Paper bag, banana, head between knees, breath - compose yourself, see if you can make a coherent point.