Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 ... 53
Send Topic Print
Racism Warning (Read 42898 times)
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35138
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #510 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48814
At my desk.
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #511 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am
 
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35138
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #512 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:12am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Try asking honest questions. They may potentially be answered.

I'll tell you another thing that would help with your success rate of getting questions answered, Fleadriver ... answering any at all yourself.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #513 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35138
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #514 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #515 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:28am
 
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.



No the questions are simple. You’re once again imagining things which just aren’t there. You keep doing that whenever you log into OzPol under the influence of drugs. You keep imagining words which aren’t there. In fact this morning you did just that. Last time you and I were in a topic about groceries you imagined entire posts which didn’t exist. Methra it might be an idea to log off and sleep off whatever it is you’ve taken this time. Come back later on and try again.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 43962
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #516 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:32am
 
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.

So diversity and inclusion is not for Aborigines then.
For them tribal law and custom must be conserved.
But Anglo customs must be overcome by multicultural diversity. As taught at every university.
The idiotic hypocrisy is clear to all  but the likes of you, frightbat.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35138
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #517 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:35am
 
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:32am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.

So diversity and inclusion is not for Aborigines then.
For them tribal law and custom must be conserved.
But Anglo customs must be overcome by multicultural diversity. As taught at every university.
The idiotic hypocrisy is clear to all  but the likes of you, frightbat.



Where on earth did you get all of that rubbish from.

Was it Ozpol?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 43962
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #518 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:40am
 
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:35am:
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:32am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.

So diversity and inclusion is not for Aborigines then.
For them tribal law and custom must be conserved.
But Anglo customs must be overcome by multicultural diversity. As taught at every university.
The idiotic hypocrisy is clear to all  but the likes of you, frightbat.



Where on earth did you get all of that rubbish from.

Was it Ozpol?

Why conserve Aboriginal customs but not European culture?
Why can only Aborigines discriminate on the basis of old customs about race and sex? Why aren't they required to go with the diversity and inclusion wheeze?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Mental Health Warning
Reply #519 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:40am
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:28am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.



No the questions are simple. You’re once again imagining things which just aren’t there. You keep doing that whenever you log into OzPol under the influence of drugs. You keep imagining words which aren’t there. In fact this morning you did just that. Last time you and I were in a topic about groceries you imagined entire posts which didn’t exist. Methra it might be an idea to log off and sleep off whatever it is you’ve taken this time. Come back later on and try again.


For the benefit of those who have only just joined us :

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1678394460/15

You have been duly warned 😂🤣
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94787
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #520 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:36pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Is it wacist to ban people from places of worship based on wace/weligion?

Is it sexist to ban people from public amenities such as toilets based on gender?

Those are questions. Up for an answer?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34084
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #521 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:38pm
 
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:35am:
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:32am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.

So diversity and inclusion is not for Aborigines then.
For them tribal law and custom must be conserved.
But Anglo customs must be overcome by multicultural diversity. As taught at every university.
The idiotic hypocrisy is clear to all  but the likes of you, frightbat.



Where on earth did you get all of that rubbish from.

Was it Ozpol?


it seemed like a reasonable question .
do you have anything to offer other then hysterics?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94787
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #522 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:40pm
 
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:40am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:35am:
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:32am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.

So diversity and inclusion is not for Aborigines then.
For them tribal law and custom must be conserved.
But Anglo customs must be overcome by multicultural diversity. As taught at every university.
The idiotic hypocrisy is clear to all  but the likes of you, frightbat.



Where on earth did you get all of that rubbish from.

Was it Ozpol?

Why conserve Aboriginal customs but not European culture?


Because they're our Boongs. If you want to eat your rollmops and smelly cheese, you can go back to where you came from.

We're Aussies. You can speak Australian or fuck off, we're full.

Welcome to country.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94787
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #523 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:45pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:38pm:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:35am:
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:32am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:18am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Too confronting I’m afraid Freediver.

These simple questions will never be answered. Expect deflection and excuses.


Because they're deceitful, erroneous questions.

This has been explained many times, Larry. Do try to keep up.

So diversity and inclusion is not for Aborigines then.
For them tribal law and custom must be conserved.
But Anglo customs must be overcome by multicultural diversity. As taught at every university.
The idiotic hypocrisy is clear to all  but the likes of you, frightbat.



Where on earth did you get all of that rubbish from.

Was it Ozpol?


it seemed like a reasonable question .
do you have anything to offer other then hysterics?


No. If the old boy wants to practice his Anglophilia, he can jolly well wait for the next coronation.

I'm sure it will be on "our ABC" for at least 3 days.

Typical.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #524 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:47pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:36pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Is it wacist to ban people from places of worship based on wace/weligion?

Is it sexist to ban people from public amenities such as toilets based on gender?

Those are questions. Up for an answer?


Karnal .... I think we’re all up for Freediver’s questions being answered first as they were asked first. Many times in fact.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 ... 53
Send Topic Print