Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 ... 54
Send Topic Print
Racism Warning (Read 46044 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46238
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #525 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:05pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:47pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:36pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Is it wacist to ban people from places of worship based on wace/weligion?

Is it sexist to ban people from public amenities such as toilets based on gender?

Those are questions. Up for an answer?


Karnal .... I think we’re all up for Freediver’s questions being answered first as they were asked first. Many times in fact.


For the wee paki, public spaces like national parks are no different to places of worship with different denominations. He is eager to Allahu Akhbar in any church or synagogue as long as the infidels are kept out of mosques coz they are a minority and tinted, mostly. So that's special, innit.
Dreamtime superstitions and secret businesses are off limits to even the wee sons of Mohammed, though. How Islamophobic can those Abos be?? He's conflicted on this, the wee son of Lahore.

And having separate toilets for men and women for him to lurk in means costume change, which is clearly an outrageous discrimination against his lurker and trouser sniffer community.
Don't give him 10 rupees nor a banana, it just emboldens him.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95783
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #526 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:14pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:47pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:36pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Is it wacist to ban people from places of worship based on wace/weligion?

Is it sexist to ban people from public amenities such as toilets based on gender?

Those are questions. Up for an answer?


Karnal .... I think we’re all up for Freediver’s questions being answered first as they were asked first. Many times in fact.


Did you hear that, FD? You have to answer the questions asked first, tsk tsk tsk.

Do you uphold the use of porkies in your campaign against the Boongs?

A simple yes or no will suffice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95783
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #527 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:24pm
 
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:47pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:36pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Is it wacist to ban people from places of worship based on wace/weligion?

Is it sexist to ban people from public amenities such as toilets based on gender?

Those are questions. Up for an answer?


Karnal .... I think we’re all up for Freediver’s questions being answered first as they were asked first. Many times in fact.


For the wee paki, public spaces like national parks are no different to places of worship with different denominations. He is eager to Allahu Akhbar in any church or synagogue as long as the infidels are kept out of mosques coz they are a minority and tinted, mostly. So that's special, innit.
Dreamtime superstitions and secret businesses are off limits to even the wee sons of Mohammed, though. How Islamophobic can those Abos be?? He's conflicted on this, the wee son of Lahore.

And having separate toilets for men and women for him to lurk in means costume change, which is clearly an outrageous discrimination against his lurker and trouser sniffer community.
Don't give him 10 rupees nor a banana, it just emboldens him.



Public spaces, is it?

I see. I've a good mind to enter your jolly kirke and inseminate your holy alter. This Sunday.

Be there.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46238
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #528 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:36pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:24pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:47pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 2:36pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Is it wacist to ban people from places of worship based on wace/weligion?

Is it sexist to ban people from public amenities such as toilets based on gender?

Those are questions. Up for an answer?


Karnal .... I think we’re all up for Freediver’s questions being answered first as they were asked first. Many times in fact.


For the wee paki, public spaces like national parks are no different to places of worship with different denominations. He is eager to Allahu Akhbar in any church or synagogue as long as the infidels are kept out of mosques coz they are a minority and tinted, mostly. So that's special, innit.
Dreamtime superstitions and secret businesses are off limits to even the wee sons of Mohammed, though. How Islamophobic can those Abos be?? He's conflicted on this, the wee son of Lahore.

And having separate toilets for men and women for him to lurk in means costume change, which is clearly an outrageous discrimination against his lurker and trouser sniffer community.
Don't give him 10 rupees nor a banana, it just emboldens him.



Public spaces, is it?

I see. I've a good mind to enter your jolly kirke and inseminate your holy alter. This Sunday.

Be there.



The mark of the wee paki dickheaddle: abandon any standards or decorum immediately. He wants to Allahu Akhbar in churches.

But will he Allahu Akhbar just as loudly when the respectable elder Abo chappies, past present and emerging,  are rogering their young on Mt Warning at full moon, by way of Dreaming of the Loin Cloth Snake in the Sky?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12501
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #529 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 6:43pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?

It depends.

Chauvinism vs cultural / poltical sensibilities.

Mecca is off-limits to non-Muslims.

Australia is off-limits to asylum-seekers arriving on boats.

Go figure.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49039
At my desk.
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #530 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 6:43pm
 
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:12am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Try asking honest questions. They may potentially be answered.

I'll tell you another thing that would help with your success rate of getting questions answered, Fleadriver ... answering any at all yourself.


You complain about being called racist, but then claim it is dishonest to ask if you think it is racist to discriminate on the basis of race. How is it "dishonest"?

Hypocrite.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95783
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #531 - Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:14pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 6:43pm:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:12am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Try asking honest questions. They may potentially be answered.

I'll tell you another thing that would help with your success rate of getting questions answered, Fleadriver ... answering any at all yourself.


You complain about being called racist, but then claim it is dishonest to ask if you think it is racist to discriminate on the basis of race. How is it "dishonest"?

Hypocrite.


What's the matter, FD, cat got your tongue?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46238
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #532 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 12:09am
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 6:43pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?

It depends.

Chauvinism vs cultural / poltical sensibilities.

Mecca is off-limits to non-Muslims.

Australia is off-limits to asylum-seekers arriving on boats.

Go figure.

So Muslims are chauvinists and Australia sensible.
Good point.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12945
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #533 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 9:39am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:23am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 9th, 2023 at 9:30pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 9th, 2023 at 8:38pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 9th, 2023 at 8:31pm:
Fraudiver, "sexual egalitarianism" was YOUR aside, the article was about material resources: 


thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 8th, 2023 at 2:54pm:
In the words of the anthropologist Bruce Knauft, such groups are characterised by ‘extreme political and sexual egalitarianism’ (1991, p.391).


How exactly do you think this worked in Aboriginal societies?

Or are you insisting all prehistoric cultures were identical and the Aborigines had no unique culture of their own?


I'm pointing to the anthropology study, as a clue to examining our own viciously unequal, neo-classical orthodoxy.

Food...more or less consumed immediately, without storage of surpluses.

Ironic: the egalitarianism of a money-less h-g economy, cf. the vicious inequality of a money obsessed, money saving culture, when money - unlike food (whether gathered or grown) - is always created out of nothing by privileged money lenders, see MMT.   


Are you actually suggesting men and women were equals in aboriginal society? You've got your noble savage blinkers on.


Confession: I saw (and liked) the anthropological study suggesting a link between "free" food in money-less hunter-gatherer societies, and "egalitarianism".   

You concentrated on the meaning of egalitarianism, I wanted to compare and draw conclusions about the vicious inequality which is a feature our money-based economy in which food must be paid for.

Sorry...silly of me to think you would be interested in drawing any such conclusions.

At least Marx would have appreciated the point....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74548
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #534 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 9:50am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 6:43pm:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 9:12am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?


Try asking honest questions. They may potentially be answered.

I'll tell you another thing that would help with your success rate of getting questions answered, Fleadriver ... answering any at all yourself.


You complain about being called racist, but then claim it is dishonest to ask if you think it is racist to discriminate on the basis of race. How is it "dishonest"?

Hypocrite.


geez you're a dishonest wanker. You should try asking if anyone agrees with you that what has happened at Mt warning is first racism instead if implying it as a given. You might get more answers.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49039
At my desk.
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #535 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 9:59am
 
Are you suggesting racism is a popularity contest John?

Quote:
You concentrated on the meaning of egalitarianism, I wanted to compare and draw conclusions about the vicious inequality which is a feature our money-based economy in which food must be paid for.


My apologies. I keep forgetting that you are never talking about what you are talking about. You are actually changing the topic to how evil capitalism is.

Quote:
Confession: I saw (and liked) the anthropological study suggesting a link between "free" food in money-less hunter-gatherer societies, and "egalitarianism".
 

Of course you liked it, but was it a reflection of reality?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46238
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #536 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 10:23am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 11th, 2023 at 9:39am:
Confession: I saw (and liked) the anthropological study suggesting a link between "free" food in money-less hunter-gatherer societies, and "egalitarianism".   

You concentrated on the meaning of egalitarianism, I wanted to compare and draw conclusions about the vicious inequality which is a feature our money-based economy in which food must be paid for.

Sorry...silly of me to think you would be interested in drawing any such conclusions.

At least Marx would have appreciated the point....



You are free to go and catch and prepare your dinner on a camp fire for free.

But why should someone ELSE catch and prepare it for you for free?


Marx was a fkkn leech and a sponging bum all his life, no wonder he would have liked more leeching and bumming off others.



Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 11th, 2023 at 10:29am by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12501
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #537 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 11:01am
 
Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2023 at 12:09am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 6:43pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:02am:
mothra wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 8:00am:
freediver wrote on Mar 10th, 2023 at 7:51am:
Quote:
It's an attempt to classify those that oppose them as racists.


If the shoe fits Mothra....


It doesn't come close.

It's classic projection.


Is it racist to ban people from a national park based on race?

Is it sexist to ban people from a national park based on gender?

It depends.

Chauvinism vs cultural / poltical sensibilities.

Mecca is off-limits to non-Muslims.

Australia is off-limits to asylum-seekers arriving on boats.

Go figure.

So Muslims are chauvinists and Australia sensible.
Good point.


Or the reverse.

Put it to the UNGA to vote.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74548
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #538 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 11:23am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 11th, 2023 at 9:59am:
Are you suggesting racism is a popularity contest John?


no, i'm suggesting that you're a dishonest wanker
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84592
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Racism Warning
Reply #539 - Mar 11th, 2023 at 3:29pm
 
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2023 at 9:50am:
geez you're a dishonest wanker. You should try asking if anyone agrees with you that what has happened at Mt warning is first racism instead if implying it as a given. You might get more answers.


It's racism - now we can move on.... and it will be overturned - we don't do racism in this country.....

Also we don't do tyranny from a bunch of fat-arsed public servants sitting in Macquarie Street or wherever who have a trendy interest in sh
i
t like handing our national parks over to crying Abos who don't go there anyway.  aquascoot laid it out for you - they conserve energy - they're not going to waste it like some white man by climbing that mountain... they'd rather observe 'im from the deck of the pub ... and those public servants need a good public flogging before their decent hanging.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 ... 54
Send Topic Print