Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 12
th, 2023 at 1:20pm:
Jesus - another dividie refutation - I don't even bother to read your 'refutation' for the simple reason that I've explained to you endlessly that just saying "No - it's not" is not a refutation.... and you must provide solid factual data and evidence and reasoning based on those in order to refute something.
The refutation applied to your nonsense about "Abo laziness"; the achievement of the CDEP in reducing alcoholism and crime refutes your ignorant racism; ie "lazy abos".
Quote:Jeez, lad - even here in Darkest Australia (you wouldn't know the tip of the social problems here) the High court has held that the opinion of an expert witness must be supported by facts and cannot stand alone... your opinion cannot stand alone.
As far as I know, the high court never adjudicated on the CDEP.
Quote:Debate? This isn't a formal debate, it is an assemblage of views and knowledge - with the emphasis on the latter.... if you have no knowledge to verify your view - you have no view....When are YOU going to provide answers apart from 'give 'em a job'.
more correctly: a presentation of opposing views (some less worthy than others; debate is a way for arriving at the usefulness of an idea).
There is a body of knowledge re the CDEP.
Quote:Even mothra has the right to a point of view, and the right to have it picked apart..... same as you.
Correct, but are you refusing the same examination of your own views....
Quote:You were saying? Try refuting instead of contradicting.... this isn't schoolyard politics...
Indeed, it's life and death stuff...like the gap.
I said the CDEP - like Robodebt - hasn't been adjudicated by the high court, refuting your argument that the CDEP has failed because it hasn't been considered by the High Court, or whatever point you thought you were making, to rubbish the CDEP.