John Smith wrote on Nov 14
th, 2021 at 5:42pm:
Cassette tapes are not those little biddy cassette tapes we would put in a regular tape player. I am talking about the ones with the bigger reels that record away for months at a time.
And when I talk about the phone calls being used as evidence in court, I mean that prosecutors would obtain a copy of the phone recording from the telecommunications company and use it in court. I had to attend court in 1997 to play witness to a phone call I received.
Without revealing the details of the court case, I was asked to identify the caller. Then asked if he was present in the courtroom. Now, if the playback of the phone call was available for the court, how the hell is that not an example of the Telstra recording phone conversations?
Criminals stay off their mobile phones when they are doing deals and other dastardly acts. And usually, they have their phones off to avoid detection. Sooo, if they are dumb enough to be engaging in talk about criminal activity, not only would they leave a record of what they say, they can also leave a record of where they are.
You are complicating an issue that should have been easier for you to understand than you are making it seem.