Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Religious rights (Read 857 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41636
Religious rights
Nov 23rd, 2021 at 4:33pm
 
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Labor majority government
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1302
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #1 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 4:36pm
 
Oh dear  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Pack ya bags rightards
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45845
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #2 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:01pm
 
"In a free society, men and women should be able to express their point of view without people running off to government authorities saying, 'Oh, I feel offended about what somebody said'."

Some people are 'concerned' about that. Tsk, tsk   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



If I was interviewing for a job and had an Australian applicant with no tats, facial ironmongery, green hair etc, a niqabi/bearded son of Mohammed and a raging LGBT/climate activist with tats and tongue stud and pink hair I would choose the best candidate for the job - the normal, nice Australian. Who wants to turn away customers?

Would I need to hide behind some religious shield? Yes - but I shouldn't have to. But we now need legislation to keep in check the snarling 'equity' mongers who are twiggered by everything and call every different view supremacists, colonialist, oppressive.


"The better the society, the less law there will be. In Heaven there will be no law, and the lion will lie down with the lamb. The values of an unjust society will reflect themselves in an unjust law. The worse the society, the more law there will be. In Hell there will be nothing but law, and due process will be meticulously observed."
Just so.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20299
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #3 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:15pm
 
Exemptions for Religious beliefs....Na....Too complicated, unnecessary, counter productive and open to abuse by those who use religion to promote hate!!!

Huh Huh Huh

Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people. Otherwise, there wouldn't be religious people.
Doris Egan, House M.D., The Right Stuff, 2007
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #4 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:37pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:15pm:
Exemptions for Religious beliefs....Na....Too complicated, unnecessary, counter productive and open to abuse by those who use religion to promote hate!!!

Huh Huh Huh

Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people. Otherwise, there wouldn't be religious people.
Doris Egan, House M.D., The Right Stuff, 2007

Rational arguments work on no one where someone's faith is concerned and is being threatened... And not just religious faith.

If someone's taken on anything as a matter of faith, they will offer you no criteria of falsifiability.

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48931
At my desk.
Re: Religious rights
Reply #5 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:38pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:15pm:
Exemptions for Religious beliefs....Na....Too complicated, unnecessary, counter productive and open to abuse by those who use religion to promote hate!!!

Huh Huh Huh

Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people. Otherwise, there wouldn't be religious people.
Doris Egan, House M.D., The Right Stuff, 2007


It's not an exemption.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45845
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #6 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:51pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:15pm:
Exemptions for Religious beliefs....Na....Too complicated, unnecessary, counter productive and open to abuse by those who use religion to promote hate!!!

Huh Huh Huh

Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people. Otherwise, there wouldn't be religious people.
Doris Egan, House M.D., The Right Stuff, 2007

Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin

Now it's writers of TV soaps that provide intellectual authority for the likes of Pill!!!

Books, learning - toooo hard, innit? 'I know what I like, I do" 'e sayz. Gimme a RATIONAL soapy and I'm 'appy. They do the RATIONAL finkin' for me! what's not to like, eh, rational-like."



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74446
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #7 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:53pm
 
I'm going to laugh when the same people calling for this bill, will be crying out for harsher penalties when some Islamic extremist uses this bill for their own ends  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #8 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:53pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:51pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:15pm:
Exemptions for Religious beliefs....Na....Too complicated, unnecessary, counter productive and open to abuse by those who use religion to promote hate!!!

Huh Huh Huh

Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people. Otherwise, there wouldn't be religious people.
Doris Egan, House M.D., The Right Stuff, 2007

Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin

Now it's writers of TV soaps that provide intellectual authority for the likes of Pill!!!

Books, learning - toooo hard, innit? 'I know what I like, I do" 'e sayz. Gimme a RATIONAL soapy and I'm 'appy. They do the RATIONAL finkin' for me! what's not to like, eh, rational-like."




Is it always intellectual outrage with you?

No humour? Just the schoolmaster from 'Another Brick in the Wall'?
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21724
A cat with a view
Re: Religious rights
Reply #9 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:07pm
 

Q.
If it goes through the Australian parliament, will all of my OzPol posts relating to followers of ISLAM have to be removed,
because 'now' they will be too offensive [to moslems] to be able to be expressed ?

What say you brian ?



.



Moslem = = a follower of ISLAM.


------- >

Yadda said.....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1570367530/2#2
Quote:

MY ARGUMENT;
1/ Every moslem is a follower of ISLAM.

2/ And ISLAM is a philosophy which mandates that its followers must fight and kill people, who reject ISLAM, and reject the primacy of ISLAMIC law.

And, a new attack is going to occur whenever      any individual moslem [living among us, in Australia] decides that 'now' is a good moment for him to prove his devotion to ISLAM and to Allah.






Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #10 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:15pm
 
Quote:
116. Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

The Constitution may have something to say about this.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20299
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #11 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:25pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:51pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 5:15pm:
Exemptions for Religious beliefs....Na....Too complicated, unnecessary, counter productive and open to abuse by those who use religion to promote hate!!!

Huh Huh Huh

Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people. Otherwise, there wouldn't be religious people.
Doris Egan, House M.D., The Right Stuff, 2007

Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin

Now it's writers of TV soaps that provide intellectual authority for the likes of Pill!!!

Books, learning - toooo hard, innit? 'I know what I like, I do" 'e sayz. Gimme a RATIONAL soapy and I'm 'appy. They do the RATIONAL finkin' for me! what's not to like, eh, rational-like."





I stated my opinion ya dickhead....You are either stupid or ignorant....My guess is both!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137098
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #12 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:30pm
 
Bam wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
116. Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

The Constitution may have something to say about this.


I thought that at first, but I think what they're proposing isn't prohibited by that Section.

Now, this is going to come as huge surprise but I heard an interview with Michaelia Cash this afternoon, on this subject, and she actually made some sense and was quite articulate.

Make no mistake though, I'm no fan of hers.  And, I'm an atheist.

Personally, if a Catholic school wants to hire only Catholic teachers, I don't have a huge problem with that.

I wonder if the Valkies/Gordons/Franks of the world feel the same way about Muslim schools.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 84233
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #13 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 7:04pm
 
Bam wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
116. Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

The Constitution may have something to say about this.



You mean the Kaffir can't claim religious rights over Ayers Rock and Mt Warning and so forth?  buggar... that'll upset 'em no end... and just when they thought they had the idiots in government on the ropes.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20299
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Religious rights
Reply #14 - Nov 23rd, 2021 at 7:18pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:30pm:
Bam wrote on Nov 23rd, 2021 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
116. Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

The Constitution may have something to say about this.


I thought that at first, but I think what they're proposing isn't prohibited by that Section.

Now, this is going to come as huge surprise but I heard an interview with Michaelia Cash this afternoon, on this subject, and she actually made some sense and was quite articulate.

Make no mistake though, I'm no fan of hers.  And, I'm an atheist.

Personally, if a Catholic school wants to hire only Catholic teachers, I don't have a huge problem with that.

I wonder if the Valkies/Gordons/Franks of the world feel the same way about Muslim schools.



I have no problem with religious schools or institutions being able to hire people of their faith which they already do....Why do we need to waste time on a perception when there is no problem....I am agnostic by the way!!!

Smiley Smiley Smiley
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print