MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 8
th, 2022 at 4:42pm:
Yes. And even at half the size the USSR couldn't stand up.It's a fallacy to think bigger is always better.
Which gets us back to the CCP goals:
individual success AND common prosperity; whether Stalin said it or not, he did not achieve it, whereas every indication is China is well on the way to achieving it, while we know it's impossible for the US with its
sovereign individual, 'survival of the fittest' ideology to achieve it.
Quote:1.4 billion people are not united, as the CCP constantly trumpet (That's how you know it's propaganda - if they need to roll out the same 'unity' trope every time there's an official statement, then it's because they're not united).
90% of the population support the national government in China, cf 50% of the population (at best) in the US.
Quote:And how could 1.4 billion people all think the same? That wouldn't even be true in a small Chinese village.
They don't all think the same, now you are being disingenuous, conflating support for their 'socialist' government with "all thinking the same".
Quote:And you see this everywhere in politics. Ever heard: 'The Australian people think/know/understand that insert issue here .
Yes, in
adversarial, two-party, Western 'democratic' rabbles aka politics, characterized by
hyper-partisanship and gridlock.