Karnal wrote on Mar 3
rd, 2022 at 10:45pm:
Right, so you don't support the invasion, and you don't support the Ukraine defending the invasion.
That's a lose-lose, no?
The loss is the the loss of innocent life when armies start firing at one another in modern civilian-based war arenas. Should have finally been criminalized in 1946.
Quote:So I'm curious. How to give everybody what they want?
I've spent hours patiently explaining it to Frank, but
deluded "freedom" ideologues like yourself are slow learners. Hopefully your own children aren't in the firing line.
Quote:If we took away said veto,
....
the UNSC would speak with one voice, to maintain the rulings of an ICJ dedicated to upholding the UNUDHR ie, by majority vote of the permanent members, just as a majority vote of justices in a nation's own Supreme Court is the foundation of rule of law in the nation; individual nations would NOT be free to wage war on the basis of the obsolete concept of
national sovereignty.
Quote:Putin would be in the Hague, in a cell next to Bush. That, dear, won't happen, as every schoolboy knows.
Both of them, being free from the burden of maintaining national "security" vis a vis other nations, would only be involved in engendering sustainable prosperity in their own nations.
Sorry, Great, I'm confused. Are you complaining about Ukrainian soldiers murdering innocent Russian troops?