Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
Send Topic Print
CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west (Read 10330 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #165 - Apr 6th, 2022 at 4:59pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 6th, 2022 at 2:57pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 6th, 2022 at 1:32pm:
Relative poverty is not decreasing in China, it is increasing.


Same as in Oz, whose government relies on charity to deal with it; whereas China reduces relative poverty via subsidization. 

Quote:
TGD, are you capable of giving a straight answer?

I just did. Close all those  'charities' in Oz , and watch what happens .

Quote:
What do you think relative poverty is?


Addressed above.

Quote:
Can you acknowledge that inequality is higher in China than in Australia,

Yes, though trending in the right direction in China  with Xi's "common prosperity", unlike Oz which relies on charity to maintain social stability. 

Quote:
and most other western countries? If not, what do you think inequality is?


Interestingly the wealthiest nation in the world with per capita gdp 5 times as high as China, is more unequal than China...., not a good look in 'the beacon of democracy' ....


Quote:
What is the difference between increasing your per capita GDP by a factor of 3, and going from 10 to 30 grains of rice to eat per day?


Today everyone in China has sufficient to eat, unlike Oz and the US where people rely on charities and food stamps respectively.


You tried to address it above. You lied. Then you changed the topic.

Being so evasive, it is hard to tell whether you are deliberately lying, or just have no clue what you are talking about.

Relative poverty is not the same in China as in Australia. It used to be almost non-existent in China, but is now worse than Australia. And it is trending worse. Meanwhile Australia's has not changed, as either you or one of the other idiot stooges recently showed. But until you figure out (or admit) what relative poverty means, don't bother responding on this point.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #166 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:29pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:07pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:03pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:02pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 1:41pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 1:35pm:
In any case, I now understand the current economic orthodoxy is the reason for the catastrophic failure to house and employ everyone at above poverty level, in the anglo countries and elsewhere.  


You know our unemployment benefits are more than double the median Chinese wage, right?


You aren't aware of PPP, obviously.

The 'welfare safety net' in Oz (and other rich anglo countries)  is well below the poverty line.   


How far below?


You missed the edit:

"The 'welfare safety net' in Oz (and other rich anglo countries)  is well below the poverty line, while median wage in China is well above poverty, in China. 





thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:24pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:15pm:
How far below?


Doesn't matter; poverty is poverty - destroying health and social cohesion. 



Are you saying that once you get below the poverty line, it does not matter if you starve to death? Do you think this is the cold logic behind the CCP starving 50 million Chinese people to death?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #167 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 2:17pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:29pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:07pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:03pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:02pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 1:41pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 1:35pm:
In any case, I now understand the current economic orthodoxy is the reason for the catastrophic failure to house and employ everyone at above poverty level, in the anglo countries and elsewhere.  


You know our unemployment benefits are more than double the median Chinese wage, right?


You aren't aware of PPP, obviously.

The 'welfare safety net' in Oz (and other rich anglo countries)  is well below the poverty line.   


How far below?


You missed the edit:

"The 'welfare safety net' in Oz (and other rich anglo countries)  is well below the poverty line, while median wage in China is well above poverty, in China. 





thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:24pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 2:15pm:
How far below?


Doesn't matter; poverty is poverty - destroying health and social cohesion. 



Are you saying that once you get below the poverty line, it does not matter if you starve to death?


No, I'm saying all poverty reduces life expectancy.

Quote:
Do you think this is the cold logic behind the CCP starving 50 million Chinese people to death?


No , I'm saying your delusional "freedom" ideology is the reason you can write crap like that.

The CCP did not have  starvation as a goal, they were truying to overcome the serfdom  which existed during the Qing dynasty.   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #168 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 2:40pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 6th, 2022 at 4:59pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 6th, 2022 at 2:57pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 6th, 2022 at 1:32pm:
Relative poverty is not decreasing in China, it is increasing.


Same as in Oz, whose government relies on charity to deal with it; whereas China reduces relative poverty via subsidization. 

Quote:
TGD, are you capable of giving a straight answer?

I just did. Close all those  'charities' in Oz , and watch what happens .

Quote:
What do you think relative poverty is?


Addressed above.

Quote:
Can you acknowledge that inequality is higher in China than in Australia,

Yes, though trending in the right direction in China  with Xi's "common prosperity", unlike Oz which relies on charity to maintain social stability. 

Quote:
and most other western countries? If not, what do you think inequality is?


Interestingly the wealthiest nation in the world with per capita gdp 5 times as high as China, is more unequal than China...., not a good look in 'the beacon of democracy' ....


Quote:
What is the difference between increasing your per capita GDP by a factor of 3, and going from 10 to 30 grains of rice to eat per day?


Today everyone in China has sufficient to eat, unlike Oz and the US where people rely on charities and food stamps respectively.


You tried to address it above. You lied. Then you changed the topic.


Wrong - and fraudulent as usual; you didn't state the particular point you imagined you were addressing.

You need to quote the particular point, and say where I "changed the subject", to reclaim your credibility. 

Quote:
Being so evasive, it is hard to tell whether you are deliberately lying, or just have no clue what you are talking about.
 

Oh dear - it's 'mirror time', as pointed out above.

Quote:
Relative poverty is not the same in China as in Australia.


ALL poverty reduces life expectancy.

Quote:
It used to be almost non-existent in China, but is now worse than Australia.


You don't understand poverty, relative poverty,  and PPP.

Re PPP, Chinese people can purchase the same goods for the equivalent of $2, which an Ozy would pay $10  for.

Quote:
  And it (poverty) is trending worse.


In the last 2 years, now that illegal US sanctions are biting? We will see.

Quote:
Meanwhile Australia's has not changed,


Poverty and inequality in Oz are increasing because the main source of wealth for most Ozy's is home ownership, the rate of which is inexorably falling.   


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #169 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 3:52pm
 
How far below the poverty line do you think our unemployment benefits are?

If you do not know how far, how can you be sure it is below the poverty line?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #170 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 5:57pm
 
There is more intellectual poverty in FleaDriver's cranium than there is in the whole of China.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46552
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #171 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 6:23pm
 
Laugh till you cry wrote on Mar 26th, 2024 at 5:57pm:
There is more intellectual poverty in FleaDriver's cranium than there is in the whole of China.


It is a testiment to the endless tolerance and accommodation that is Western civilistation that you are still alive.

If you carried on like this in China against China, Or Araby against the Mohammedans, you would have disappeared DECADES ago, copper pyramids be damned.

It is one of the greatest and most admirable aspects of western civilisation that it it lets its critics speak, no matter how ****ing deranged and hostile like you they are.

The West is magnanimous in a way all other little pinched, tribal bozos are not.

China - what a ***ing dump for ANYONE who wants to think and be creative.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #172 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 6:41pm
 
I repeat for Judophile Frank:

There is more intellectual poverty in FleaDriver's cranium than there is in the whole of China.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #173 - Mar 26th, 2024 at 6:48pm
 
Frank I think he is complimenting me / insulting China.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #174 - Mar 27th, 2024 at 3:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2024 at 3:52pm:
How far below the poverty line do you think our unemployment benefits are?


Ok...back to specific questions. Good.

(google):

People in households relying on JobSeeker were $269 per week below the poverty line, and people in households relying on parenting payment were $246 per week below the poverty line.22 Mar 2023

and

" A 2022 study found that 3.3 million people in Australia live below the poverty line", including 761,000 children....which accounts for the 20,000 homeless children turned away by relevent authorities in 2023.

Quote:
If you do not know how far, how can you be sure it is below the poverty line?


Unlike you, I keep abreast of current affairs.  Try watching SBS news instead of Sky News.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #175 - Mar 27th, 2024 at 3:40pm
 
Quote:
People in households relying on JobSeeker were $269 per week below the poverty line, and people in households relying on parenting payment were $246 per week below the poverty line.22 Mar 2023


What was the poverty line? Why did you not include the link?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #176 - Mar 27th, 2024 at 3:55pm
 
Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2024 at 6:23pm:
Laugh till you cry wrote on Mar 26th, 2024 at 5:57pm:
There is more intellectual poverty in FleaDriver's cranium than there is in the whole of China.


It is a testiment to the endless tolerance and accommodation that is Western civilistation that you are still alive.


Nonsense. China lifted  its life expectancy from 45 to 79 years  since 1950.

[India: " average life expectancy of an Indian has increased from 39.93 years in 1960 to 69.27 years in 2020."

US : "life expectancy for the total population in the United States increased by almost 10 years from 69.7 years in 1960 to 79.4 years in 2015. " 

Still only 79 years in 2024 ]

Quote:
If you carried on like this in China against China, Or Araby against the Mohammedans, you would have disappeared DECADES ago, copper pyramids be damned.


Like Assange against the US?

Quote:
It is one of the greatest and most admirable aspects of western civilisation that it it lets its critics speak, no matter how ****ing deranged and hostile like you they are.


Assange's life has been ruined, as have the lives of millions of people forced to live below the poverty line in your vicious, neoliberal economies.

Quote:
The West is magnanimous in a way all other little pinched, tribal bozos are not.


Geez.. another blind, dumb comfortable conservative spouting nonsense and oozing indifference.

Indifference which will soon have to face the revolt of the people , see the tweets in the MMT thread - people demanding change.   

Quote:
China - what a ***ing dump for ANYONE who wants to think and be creative.


They are proud of the smart new infrstructure their creativity has produced. See any HS rail in the US or Oz?

And plenty of space for creativity, on the path to a "beautiful, green socialist China" exploring space, driver-less cars,  green technology,  and more.      
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #177 - Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:38am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:28am:
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:13am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:09am:
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 10:58am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 10:57am:
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 10:32am:
Do you expect us to believe that all the posts you make in support or defence of the CCP are just a coincidence?


Yes. Any similarity of my views with certain polices of the CCP are a coincidence.

I'm a Marxist in spirit, remember...


You don't just defend their policies. You defend their actions. You parrot their propaganda.

All just a coincidence?


1. Their's is a Marxist constitution, which I defend.

2. I don't defend their secrecy, born out of paranoia about delusional 'individual rights'.  Assange was similarly  crucified in the West, on 'secrecy' grounds. 

3. You - being deluded by 'shared belief' in non-existent "natural individual rights" -  and claiming to recognize political propaganda, is an oxymoron.     


Your efforts to make it appear that Australia has more people below the poverty line than China


(sigh) that is NOT my concern, which is to show 'common prosperity' is achievable, using the CCP's example of eradicating poverty at the fastest rate in history, while Oz if going backwards, shutting an entire generation out of home ownership.   

Quote:
- is that

a) CCP policy
b) CCP actions
c) CCP propaganda


a) - yes

b) - sometimes

c) - no.




So it is not propaganda because the CCP actually has a policy of making it appear that Australia has more people below the poverty line than China?

And you would never say something like:

Quote:
"The 'welfare safety net' in Oz (and other rich anglo countries)  is well below the poverty line, while median wage in China is well above poverty, in China.


because it is not your concern? Or you would say it, but it is not your concern whether it is true?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #178 - Apr 1st, 2024 at 4:33pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:38am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:28am:
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:13am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 11:09am:
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 10:58am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 10:57am:
freediver wrote on Apr 1st, 2024 at 10:32am:
Do you expect us to believe that all the posts you make in support or defence of the CCP are just a coincidence?


Yes. Any similarity of my views with certain polices of the CCP are a coincidence.

I'm a Marxist in spirit, remember...


You don't just defend their policies. You defend their actions. You parrot their propaganda.

All just a coincidence?


1. Their's is a Marxist constitution, which I defend.

2. I don't defend their secrecy, born out of paranoia about delusional 'individual rights'.  Assange was similarly  crucified in the West, on 'secrecy' grounds. 

3. You - being deluded by 'shared belief' in non-existent "natural individual rights" -  and claiming to recognize political propaganda, is an oxymoron.     


Your efforts to make it appear that Australia has more people below the poverty line than China


(sigh) that is NOT my concern, which is to show 'common prosperity' is achievable, using the CCP's example of eradicating poverty at the fastest rate in history, while Oz if going backwards, shutting an entire generation out of home ownership.   

Quote:
- is that

a) CCP policy
b) CCP actions
c) CCP propaganda


a) - yes

b) - sometimes

c) - no.




So it is not propaganda because the CCP actually has a policy of making it appear that Australia has more people below the poverty line than China?


No - the correct answer to most of your insane questions.

1. The CCP is not interested in Oz's poverty line.

2. Oz's poverty line kills people - see the gap,  and the lower life expectancy among ALL groups affected by poverty, cf the population who are not affected by poverty.   

Quote:
And you would never say something like:

"The 'welfare safety net' in Oz (and other rich anglo countries)  is well below the poverty line, while median wage in China is well above poverty, in China.


Yes I would, as patiently explained above. And do you understand 'median wage' , which in a middle income country like China is above the poverty line? (Not to mention 'PPP', ie purchasing power of a nation's currency, compared to other nations?)

Quote:
because it is not your concern? Or you would say it, but it is not your concern whether it is true?


Both questions shown to be nonsense, as noted above. 

Meanwhile, speaking of 'patient explanation', NOT ONCE have you addressed the reality that we are all (to one degree or another) naturally competitive, self-interested individuals. ...... and the implications of  that reality for rule of law and "individual rights".

NOT ONCE  -  you are too busy finding fault with the CCP, which is why you transferred your 'foundations' thread to various China bashing threads, to avoid looking at your own illusions/delusions.  

Are you a fraud, or incompetent?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 1st, 2024 at 4:46pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: CCP stooges: less poverty in China than the west
Reply #179 - Apr 1st, 2024 at 6:58pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 27th, 2024 at 3:31pm:
People in households relying on JobSeeker were $269 per week below the poverty line, and people in households relying on parenting payment were $246 per week below the poverty line.22 Mar 2023


What was the poverty line? Why did you not include the link?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
Send Topic Print