freediver wrote on Feb 19
th, 2022 at 6:30pm:
People are not "made rich". They make themselves rich.
Semantics? The Singaporeans submitted to government directed by, in effect, one man...and achieved a spectacular rise in living standards. But they were only a population of around 4 million.
Now the task of lifting the living standards of 1.4 billion people is far more complex, because a service industry alone will not achieve it.
Quote:All the government has to do is get out of the way and let them.
Singapore proves: not so.
Quote:The size of the population makes little difference. If anything, it is easier with large populations due to economies of scale. The larger countries can compete in industries such as automotive that smaller nations such as Australia could not.
But you have to build the factories first. Both China and India languished while Japan out competed the US in manufacturing. China had to start at the low-end, low wage manufacturing first. And where will India start?
Quote:We are concerned they will go the way of Nazi Germany, and drag everyone else down with them. The writing is on the wall.
Ah...that makes sense.
No, don't worry, the Chinese have no interest in conquering anyone else, only in defending their own existence as a state.
Quote:You mean in 20 years, assuming no more "mistakes", you will reach the living standards the west has now, largely by copying it.
No, not by copying it. Evergrande and funny-money tech etc etc have already alerted the CCP to the downsides of the West's free market system.
Quote:Remember, it was not that long ago that for no good reason at all, other than stupid ideology and believing its own propaganda, your government starved 50 million of its citizens to death, and you are now defending it keeping the population ignorant of this so that it can repeat the mistake.
Obviously nonsense. The last thing the CCP wants is to repeat that mistake.
Quote:One mistake, and you will find the Chinese people not so forgiving of your lies.
The CCP is well aware of that.
Quote:I meant your idiotic propaganda about China becoming rich. You provide no evidence at all.
?? the "China miracle" is the most widely accepted reality of modern economics, including among Western economists.
Quote:The facts point to China still being wracked by poverty. All you provide is spin, not substance. Then pretend not to understand what I am saying.
I understand what you are saying, which is China still has poverty...just as the US and Oz do. But it's the
rate of eradication of poverty which is the important factor, high in China and low - if at all - in the US and Oz.