Australian Politics Forum - Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96360

Re: Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising
Reply #45 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:25pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 3:13pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 9:52am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 29^th, 2022 at 4:17pm:

incorrect.

very few people including you are "trying to be educated'

you are trying to be 'stimulated' and you are trying to feel 'pleasurable emotions"

feeling safe and nurtured is pleasurable

being self reliant and resilient is not.

feeling "outraged' is also pleasurable.

people get addicted to that. they love it.

Do you mean like how you have gone full conspiracy nut, chasing that high of being right even when you're not?

Yearning for those pleasurable emotions and being stimulated by feeling safe and nurtured by the people telling you what you want to hear?

Is that why when you cite pre-print research papers that you've misrepresented the meaning and the author no less has to come out to debunk the conclusions you've reached (or the ones others reached and fed to you and you accepted without question because it's what you wanted to hear), you refuse to admit you were wrong and ghost the thread?

It's not very pleasurable being wrong, but it's a great opportunity to learn more.

But you won't ever do that because despite your words, you are not in fact resilient and can't acknowledge your mistake and you choose the easy road, the cowardly way out because you're addicted to that the safe space you've created for yourself.

https://www.nerdfitness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/morpheus.gif

incorrect.

do you think google are like a public librarain, just serving up unbiased information.

its not a conspiracy theory to point out that is not the case.

no public librarain makes 200 billion a year Grin

No, dear, but then, no public librarian controls the TGA, no?

Do you mind if I ask - which other agencies does Google have control over? We dare not mention the diabolical Fauci, but does Google get other state agencies to issue fines against Pfizer's competitors?

How about NSW Transport? How about the NSW Roads and Transport Authority? Wait - how about the despicable Australian Tax Office?

The leftards love that, yes? I say Google gets them to fine people who haven't yet deferred to Pfizer. Could you provide some evidence for that too?

Cheers.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:31pm by Karnal »

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34972
Gender: male

Re: Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising
Reply #46 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:30pm

Karnal wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 3:13pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 9:52am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 29^th, 2022 at 4:17pm:

incorrect.

very few people including you are "trying to be educated'

you are trying to be 'stimulated' and you are trying to feel 'pleasurable emotions"

feeling safe and nurtured is pleasurable

being self reliant and resilient is not.

feeling "outraged' is also pleasurable.

people get addicted to that. they love it.

Do you mean like how you have gone full conspiracy nut, chasing that high of being right even when you're not?

Yearning for those pleasurable emotions and being stimulated by feeling safe and nurtured by the people telling you what you want to hear?

Is that why when you cite pre-print research papers that you've misrepresented the meaning and the author no less has to come out to debunk the conclusions you've reached (or the ones others reached and fed to you and you accepted without question because it's what you wanted to hear), you refuse to admit you were wrong and ghost the thread?

It's not very pleasurable being wrong, but it's a great opportunity to learn more.

But you won't ever do that because despite your words, you are not in fact resilient and can't acknowledge your mistake and you choose the easy road, the cowardly way out because you're addicted to that the safe space you've created for yourself.

https://www.nerdfitness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/morpheus.gif

incorrect.

do you think google are like a public librarain, just serving up unbiased information.

its not a conspiracy theory to point out that is not the case.

no public librarain makes 200 billion a year Grin

No, dear, but then, no public librarian controls the TGA, no?

Do you mind if I ask - which other agencies does Google have control over? We dare not mention the diabolical Fauci, but does Google get other state agencies to issue fines against Pfizer's competitors?

How about NSW Transport? How about the NSW Roads and Transport Authority? Wait - how about the despicable Australian Tax Office?

The leftards love that, yes? I say Google gets them to fine people who haven't yet deferred to Pfizer. Could you provide some evidence for that too?

Cheers.

its interesting you mention the tax office.

bernie sanders looked likely to win the 2020 nomination until he proposed increasing taxes on the big tech companies.

bezos (googles biggest partner) wasnt very happy with that and neither was zuckerburg or gates.

did you notice how google and microsoft were ALWAYS in the courts 10 years ago suing each other.

and yet now, no lawsuits for a decade.
best buddies Grin

.

so, along comes bernie and he is going to tweak the tax system(as you said).

not gunna happen.

google and their mates got behind Jo who is a perfect patsy.

not one negative story was allowed on facebook about Jo and hunter biden
you posted it, you got shut down.
you searched for it in the run up to 2020 election and you wouldnt find it.
you would find a politifact site calling ti fake news.

you really arent so stupid as to think google which makes 150 billion a year doesnt manipulate searches to favour their friends Grin

have you done the simple task of asking the "librarian" to suggest something starting with the letter A.

did you get amazon as a suggestion, even if you have NEVER shopped there Grin

try T, you'll get target.

its rivers of gold for google to manipulate YOUR reality

Back to top

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17630
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising
Reply #47 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 1:11pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 3:13pm:

incorrect.

do you think google are like a public librarain, just serving up unbiased information.

its not a conspiracy theory to point out that is not the case.

no public librarain makes 200 billion a year Grin

You're blurring the lines as usual.

We've covered the issues with the digital gatekeepers and "big tech" before, but that's got nothing to do with this thread unless you're leaning into your all-purpose plan b.

And as usual, you've got yourself tangled up in a web of competing conspiracies. I know I know, I used the C-word, don't get triggered just yet, let me explain.

Your claim was that Pfizer had some influence over the TGA in fining a competitor of theirs when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines.

First of all, that should be a point of celebration since you're against the vaccines now, but that's the first part of the web you've got yourself in.

No, but instead, you're pushing aside your hate for vaccines to focus on Pfizer and the claim that they are so big they're able to influence the TGA to fine a competitor.

When asked for the evidence you bring out the all-purpose plan B, that is, the evidence is being hidden by Big Tech because they're also in on it with Pfizer, one "Big" happy family.

But another part of the web you've got yourself tangled in is the fact that the ads for the competitor that got them fined were running on Google and Facebook platforms.

Every time you introduce a new layer of complexity to your conspiracy you end up shooting yourself in the foot.

And what will you do next, you'll start a new post saying "incorrect" and then add yet another layer to the conspiracy?

We're still at the starting blocks mate. It looks like the TGA did their job and fined a company for making unproven claims about a vaccine they're developing.

This should be music to your antivax ears, but you're so far down in the rabbit hole you don't even know what you're looking for anymore.

So you try to shoehorn it into your Big Pharma argument about Pfizer.

And the worst part is, you're now disagreeing with me over something we actually agree on, Pfizer is bad.

Just because I want some evidence to support your claim before I start to believe it, because it is a big claim, the TGA is controlled by Pfizer, you say I'm pro-Pfizer, or pro-Google etc...

Just cite your sources. It's so much easier than this back and forth and in the end, you'll just end up changing the subject and/or ghosting the thread.

And if you're upfront about not having any evidence and that it's merely something that could be possible, then just say that. If it's you're opinion that's fine. But claiming it's a fact, that's where you keep getting yourself in trouble.

You're just like Master Light, and I don't think you realise the significance and the depth of that insult.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34972
Gender: male

Re: Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising
Reply #48 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 1:58pm

incorrect.

my point was an aussie vaccine maker gets fined for advertising

pfizer spends 5 billion advertising, mainly by getting google and facebook to "help their narrative' (which is ADVERTISING) and they get applause.

the unthinking masses just find it easier not to think about the MASSIVE misinformation and disinformation available to a company that spends 5 billion on promotion.

coca cola spends about the same on "coke adds life"

am i a conspiracy theorist for questioning whether "coke really adds life" Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96360

Re: Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising
Reply #49 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 2:18pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:30pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 3:13pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 9:52am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 29^th, 2022 at 4:17pm:

incorrect.

very few people including you are "trying to be educated'

you are trying to be 'stimulated' and you are trying to feel 'pleasurable emotions"

feeling safe and nurtured is pleasurable

being self reliant and resilient is not.

feeling "outraged' is also pleasurable.

people get addicted to that. they love it.

is that why when you cite pre-print research papers that you've misrepresented the meaning and the author no less has to come out to debunk the conclusions you've reached (or the ones others reached and fed to you and you accepted without question because it's what you wanted to hear), you refuse to admit you were wrong and ghost the thread?

incorrect.

No, dear, but then, no public librarian controls the TGA, no?

Do you mind if I ask - which other agencies does Google have control over? We dare not mention the diabolical Fauci, but does Google get other state agencies to issue fines against Pfizer's competitors?

How about NSW Transport? How about the NSW Roads and Transport Authority? Wait - how about the despicable Australian Tax Office?

The leftards love that, yes? I say Google gets them to fine people who haven't yet deferred to Pfizer. Could you provide some evidence for that too?

Cheers.

its interesting you mention the tax office.

bernie sanders looked likely to win the 2020 nomination until he proposed increasing taxes on the big tech companies.

bezos (googles biggest partner) wasnt very happy with that and neither was zuckerburg or gates.

did you notice how google and microsoft were ALWAYS in the courts 10 years ago suing each other.

and yet now, no lawsuits for a decade.
best buddies Grin

.

so, along comes bernie and he is going to tweak the tax system(as you said).

not gunna happen.

google and their mates got behind Jo who is a perfect patsy.

not one negative story was allowed on facebook about Jo and hunter biden
you posted it, you got

have you done the simple task of asking the "librarian" to suggest something starting with the letter A.

did you get amazon as a suggestion, even if you have NEVER shopped there Grin

try T, you'll get target.

its rivers of gold for google to manipulate YOUR reality

Incorrect.

Here's Bezos supporting higher taxes.

Quote:

In a surprising turn, Amazon's founder and CEO has endorsed President Joe Biden's tax hike meant to pay for overhauling US infrastructure.

[url]https://m.dw.com/en/amazons-jeff-bezos-says-he-supports-paying-higher-taxes/a-57
116163
[/url]

Here's Zuckerberg.

Quote:

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has expressed his support to international reforms that would require Silicon Valley tech giants to pay more tax in Europe.

At the Munich Security Conference on Friday, February 14, Zuckerberg said he accept Facebook may have to pay more tax under new tax reforms.

https://dig.watch/updates/facebook-expresses-its-intention-pay-more-digital-tax/...

Here's Zuckerberg and Gates and all the gang:

Quote:

A 70% marginal tax rate. A 77% estate tax. A 3% tax on every dollar over $1 billion of net worth. As various plans to tax the ultra-rich gain steam in American political discourse—and after a recent bombshell report that the 400 richest Americans paid a lower tax rate than other income groups last year—many billionaires have been challenged to address their very existence amid growing income inequality.

At least a dozen billionaires have made public statements that call for the super-rich to pay more in taxes. On Monday, Salesforce chairman and cofounder Marc Benioff penned the latest in a string of billionaire op-eds calling for higher taxes on the wealthy. The California software entrepreneur, who ranked No. 93 on The Forbes 400 list of richest Americans released earlier this month, wrote that “increasing taxes on high-income individuals like myself would help generate the trillions of dollars that we desperately need to improve education and health care and fight climate change.”

He’s not the only billionaire pushing to pay more. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, the No. 2 and 3 wealthiest Americans, are the richest supporters of the estate tax, which is levied on the assets of people who have died. Buffett advocated for a higher tax on the wealth years ago and in 2017 said on CNBC that the proposed elimination of the estate tax was “a terrible mistake". Gates in February called himself “the biggest proponent of having the estate tax collect more money.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/cartercoudriet/2019/10/15/billionaires-more-taxes-g...

The rich want to pay more tax, dear. Buffet's even formed a lobby group to do so. It's the chodes who want to pay no tax. No names, dear, you know. Lives of pure garbage.

But do you know? All these articles and all these facts may just be Google, mixing up the words. I searched billionaires trying to pay less tax, like you said. All I got was them trying to pay more.

So unfair, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96360

Re: Aussie Made Vaccine Fined for advertising
Reply #50 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 2:31pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 1:58pm:

incorrect.

my point was an aussie vaccine maker gets fined for advertising

Oh, is that all?

Sorry, dear. We thought you were saying Pfizer told Google to tell our politicians to tell the TGA to fine an Aussie vax company.

Silly old us, no? Turns out you were just saying, that's all.

My apologies, dear. Next time, we'll try to clarify first, okay?

Google must have mixed you all up.

Typical.

Back to top

IP Logged