Australian Politics Forum - Ivermectin study results

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34972
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #15 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:02am

Incorrect Skippy

Do you really think that pfizer and moderna are hoping and praying ivermectin works

Do you really think that the mainstream media and our tga are hoping and praying that ivermectin works

You think they will be happy to stand up and tell the public

Oops

Sorry about those 6 million dead
Sorry we banned doctors for trying to prescribe it
Sorry we called horse dewormer

But hey look on the bright side
Booster number five is soon available

Just continue to double down on your vaccine
You and the mainstream media the government and the pharmaceutical industry have come too far to go back now

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #16 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 138963
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #17 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:10am

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Bingo!

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #18 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:18am

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #19 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:18am

For the benefit of those individuals who sit in the id Sad Kangapoo

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 10:12pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 9:03pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 8:19pm:

https://youtu.be/cX8szNPgrEs

For the children of Ukraine.
For ALL children of this sad and sorry world.

I do not understand that song

Sprint I love your honesty.

This song touched my heart when it was first released in 1998. Yes ... some 24 years ago 😔

The song is about the effect of totalitarianism on humanity esp the children ... the future of humanity. Totalitarianism comes in 2 forms : fascism and communism. These extreme forms of control on people aren't that much different as they become more and more extreme.

The clip explores these effects.

Total control leads to facelessness and to automaton type humans who lack individuality and identity.

Such people comply one by one to instructions like obedient robots attached to electricity. In fact everything is controlled by electricity. Once the switch is turned off nothing exists or can exist. It's totally reliant on that form of power and control.

The irony in that clip is that we aren't really alive anyway. We are made to believe we are alive. We go through the motions of real life but it's all just a sanitised version of reality that we've been allowed to live in and believe in.

The masks over the face in that clip relate to the fact that we can't breathe normal natural air as it's become too dangerous. Our mind's eyes are blinded so we are effectively walking around with no eyes. We function according to instruction in a sanitized environment covered in plastic so as to be safe from killer germs/viruses. That's why there's a lot of plastic covered and sealed off instruments everywhere.

Which brings us to people sitting around what appears to be natural clean water. Except it's anything but natural and clean. It's filthy and can't be drunk. It's tainted red. Why? People have died in this type of world order. Lots of people have died so much so the evidence of the REAL level of bloodshed is creeping through any which way it can in the vain hope it will wake the blind who can't see the truth because they no longer possess the physical ability to see through the convincing propaganda that shapes and controls their reality.

Ultimately this seals the fate of humanity as the children are brought up in this NEW NORMAL "reality" and all they know is to obey when told. No free thinking exists anymore.

Note : This song was written in 1998. It may as well have been a prophecy. Oh wait .... the band was called THE manic street PREACHERS 😔

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:24am by Lisa Jones »

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17636
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #20 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:29am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:02am:

Incorrect Skippy

Do you really think that pfizer and moderna are hoping and praying ivermectin works

I don't care what they want, I'm not obsessed with them nor do I base my sense of reality around what I think, they think.

What I want is a treatment for COVID, 2 years ago, that would mean no need for vaccines, no need for quarantine, lockdowns or isolations.

Quote:

Do you really think that the mainstream media and our tga are hoping and praying that ivermectin works

Again, unlike you, I am capable of thinking for myself and I don't care what the opinions of the "MSM" are.

Quote:

You think they will be happy to stand up and tell the public

I don't care if they're happy. You're obsessing over the wrong thing mate...

Quote:

Oops

Sorry about those 6 million dead
Sorry we banned doctors for trying to prescribe it
Sorry we called horse dewormer

But hey look on the bright side
Booster number five is soon available

Just continue to double down on your vaccine
You and the mainstream media the government and the pharmaceutical industry have come too far to go back now

If Ivermectin worked, it would be easy to prove. It would be a great arrow in the quiver against COVID.

But the way in which it's been publicised by certain people and groups, while its effectiveness is unproven, it costs lives.

The risks of the side effects are increased in the way that COVID attacks the body, but that's not the worst part. People are being convinced to rely on Ivermectin and the other quack cures instead of traditional medicine that can actually save them.

They're dying for nothing but the greed of grifters. It's exactly what you hate about big pharma, only you're a part of the "grassroots" grift. Pushing Ivermectin through the use of conspiracy theories hoping to convince people to not trust anything mainstream and push them towards the grifters who need the views and the donations to profit from their con who are happy to tell you whatever it is you want to hear, so long as they keep getting paid.

Thankfully you and the sheep like you, don't have the same influence of big pharma. It's bad enough that they exist in the form in which they do to also have the likes of you pushing those who don't trust big pharma to an early grave.

Distrust in big pharma, big anything, is healthy. But using that distrust to grift people... Nah, poor form.

Countries all over the world want to have the least impact from COVID both on the people and especially on their budgets and their election chances, especially in the less developed world.

Big Pharma doesn't have the war chest to bribe them all.

All of those out there and in this thread who don't trust big pharma have a set of criteria as to why. Rules and standards they judge content they don't like are clear. I'm one of them.

Where you and I differ is that I apply that standard across the board. You and those like you don't.

Would you accept the efficacy of a vaccine based on research as flimsy as what you're holding up here as proof Ivermectin works?

I mean honestly, really would you?!

Well?

Back to top

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17636
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #21 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:34am

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Can you stop stalking me?

I'm one of the few people here without any fake accounts, it's just me. We can have a differing opinion, we don't all have to agree, but you're starting to dive head first into what the eSaftey Commissioner outlines as cyberbullying.

I don't understand your obsession with me, but it's starting to get uncomfortable.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 138963
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #22 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:39am

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Can you stop stalking me?

I'm one of the few people here without any fake accounts, it's just me. We can have a differing opinion, we don't all have to agree, but you're starting to dive head first into what the eSaftey Commissioner outlines as cyberbullying.

I don't understand your obsession with me, but it's starting to get uncomfortable.

Similarly, I have just one account here.

However, Lisa seems certain that I run several socks.

And it's not just you and me - she makes this accusation about several forum members.

Not sure where her paranoia stems from.

Back to top

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17636
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #23 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:46am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:39am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Can you stop stalking me?

I'm one of the few people here without any fake accounts, it's just me. We can have a differing opinion, we don't all have to agree, but you're starting to dive head first into what the eSaftey Commissioner outlines as cyberbullying.

I don't understand your obsession with me, but it's starting to get uncomfortable.

Similarly, I have just one account here.

However, Lisa seems certain that I run several socks.

And it's not just you and me - she makes this accusation about several forum members.

Not sure where her paranoia stems from.

It happens with conspiracy theorists when they run into people who stand up for the truth and the facts. It's always counter to what they believe and they take it personally, thinking people are out to get them.

It's bad enough when it happens with random posters online, but it starts being tragic when they act this way towards their family Sad

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #24 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:53am

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Can you stop stalking me?

I'm one of the few people here without any fake accounts, it's just me. We can have a differing opinion, we don't all have to agree, but you're starting to dive head first into what the eSaftey Commissioner outlines as cyberbullying.

I don't understand your obsession with me, but it's starting to get uncomfortable.

Stop with the pathetic histrionics which only turn up when you've been pwned!

You should feel uncomfortable when your BS is called out. And you should feel uncomfortable when you post links which undermine the BS you post NOT support it.

You should feel uncomfortable when you're outted for illogic reasoning.

You should feel uncomfortable when you slur others online based on lies which are not substantiated by links you hope people won't click on.

Now .... read my last post. Notice what I stated to you? Stop deflecting and respond to the posts directed at you. Otherwise go post in some cooking topic. And even there you had better not post BS either.

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #25 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:57am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:39am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Can you stop stalking me?

I'm one of the few people here without any fake accounts, it's just me. We can have a differing opinion, we don't all have to agree, but you're starting to dive head first into what the eSaftey Commissioner outlines as cyberbullying.

I don't understand your obsession with me, but it's starting to get uncomfortable.

Similarly, I have just one account here.

However, Lisa seems certain that I run several socks.

And it's not just you and me - she makes this accusation about several forum members.

Not sure where her paranoia stems from.

Might just leave this BS here. For the rest of OzPol to read and laugh at.

Groggy .... get your insane head tested. You've been outed that many times (and that's just in the 15 yrs that I know you) 😂🤣😆

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 47794 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #26 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:36am Larry .... get your insane head tested. I am not Sad Kangaroo—it is your insanity that says I am Sad Kangaroo, nothing more. Your insane drivel cannot be helping OzPol thrive.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18652
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #27 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:43am

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

There is plenty of evidence Ivermectin is an effective treatment which proves people like you are deaf dumb and blind when you choose to ignore it.

Here are 81 studies which show Ivermectin works not a single study in this list favours the control group over Ivermectin. https://ivmmeta.com/ If you click on Home with that link you will find studies on all the other drugs trialled with covid.

There are no real side effects with Ivermectin it's safer than Paracetamol which is what doctors tell you to take when you catch covid.

It's funny how people like you push Pfizer which hasn't been peer reviewed.
How can it be peer reviewed when data hasn't been released?

Pfizer wanted 55 years to release data then tried to increase it to 75 years before Mr Siri took them to court demanding immediate release of Data. If Pfizer has nothing to hide why should we wait till everyone who has taken might die before data gets released.

The elephant in the room is why do they need 75 years to release Pfizer data?

Pick your source and educate yourself.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=pfizer+75+years+to+release+vaccine+data&sourc...

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 138963
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #28 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:48am

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:43am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

There is plenty of evidence Ivermectin is an effective treatment ...

Sure.

Not for COVID though.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34972
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #29 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 10:02am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:48am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:43am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

There is plenty of evidence Ivermectin is an effective treatment ...

Sure.

Not for COVID though.

Hey skip

You said we would ALL be happy if ivermectin worked

You reckon Greg would Grin

Back to top

IP Logged