Australian Politics Forum - Ivermectin study results

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17743
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #30 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 10:34am

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:43am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

There is plenty of evidence Ivermectin is an effective treatment which proves people like you are deaf dumb and blind when you choose to ignore it.

Here are 81 studies which show Ivermectin works not a single study in this list favours the control group over Ivermectin. https://ivmmeta.com/ If you click on Home with that link you will find studies on all the other drugs trialled with covid.

There are no real side effects with Ivermectin it's safer than Paracetamol which is what doctors tell you to take when you catch covid.

It's funny how people like you push Pfizer which hasn't been peer reviewed.
How can it be peer reviewed when data hasn't been released?

Pfizer wanted 55 years to release data then tried to increase it to 75 years before Mr Siri took them to court demanding immediate release of Data. If Pfizer has nothing to hide why should we wait till everyone who has taken might die before data gets released.

The elephant in the room is why do they need 75 years to release Pfizer data?

Pick your source and educate yourself.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=pfizer+75+years+to+release+vaccine+data&sourc...

If you have to start talking about Pfizer when we're talking about Ivermectin, you have a problem. It has nothing to do with them.

Back to top

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17743
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #31 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 10:37am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 10:02am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:48am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:43am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

There is plenty of evidence Ivermectin is an effective treatment ...

Sure.

Not for COVID though.

Hey skip

You said we would ALL be happy if ivermectin worked

You reckon Greg would Grin

Judging by what he's said in the past, yes.

We all want better treatment for COVID.

It just needs to actually be proven to work as many people thanks to the political nature of COVID, will do, say and take anything so long as it aligned with their politics and some how conservatism has taken the anti-intellectual route on such an important issue, so before the treatments are publicised they need to be proven to work as these people will do whatever they can to take them so they can run counter to the mainstream, because reasons?

Back to top

IP Logged

buzzanddidj

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 14213
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #32 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 10:42am

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:36am:

Larry .... get your insane head tested.

I am not Sad Kangaroo—it is your insanity that says I am
Sad Kangaroo, nothing more. Your insane drivel cannot be helping OzPol thrive.

It is just one more conspiracy theory - among conspiracy theorists - that anyone who disagrees with them has multiple identities

I'm a bit hurt, that I haven't been paired of with any other ID - as yet

.

.

Back to top

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'

- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 47794 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #33 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:00am Oh, your turn will come!
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59129
Here
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #34 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:05am

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 10:42am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 9:36am:

Larry .... get your insane head tested.

I am not Sad Kangaroo—it is your insanity that says I am
Sad Kangaroo, nothing more. Your insane drivel cannot be helping OzPol thrive.

It is just one more conspiracy theory - among conspiracy theorists - that anyone who disagrees with them has multiple identities

I'm a bit hurt, that I haven't been paired of with any other ID - as yet

.

.

There are about 5 people who routinely claim anyone who disagrees with them use multiple identities, In fact they are mostly all Gregory. They cannot even see that this is statistically close to not possible.

I am sure that if you provide facts to show any of these characters are wrong as is routinely the case you will also be a Greggory sock.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35023 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #35 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:25am Gregory is Jim lahey but I believe the marsupial is a separate species
Back to top	IP Logged

buzzanddidj

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 14213
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #36 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:39am

Dnarever wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:05am:

I am sure that if you provide facts to show any of these characters are wrong as is routinely the case you will also be a Greggory sock.

I'd take that as a COMPLIMENT
He's probably the most researched poster ON here
I guess that's why he 'gets up the nose' of so many resident conspiracy theorists

.

Back to top

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'

- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 59129 Here Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #37 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:41am aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:25am: Gregory is Jim lahey but I believe the marsupial is a separate species Claiming that Greg is Jim is about the same (maybe less likely) than saying Aquascoot is Lisa. Are you?
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35023 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #38 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim the evidence was crystal clear
Back to top	IP Logged

buzzanddidj Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 14213 Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #39 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 1:36pm aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm: bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim the evidence was crystal clear Conspiracy theorists have WAY too much idle time on their hands They REALLY need to "get a life" .
Back to top	'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.' - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96417

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #40 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 1:42pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:53am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 8:05am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

https://c.tenor.com/JFymrymJG1oAAAAM/pretend-shocked.gif

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Aren't you the multi shared troll Mong who invents litigation cases which never happened? You're pushing that wheelchair of malevolent intent uphill as you struggle with your conscience about what you've been ordered to believe by mass machine gunning media messages.

Many of us were once like you. We woke up eventually. And the brutal reality hit us hard. Once we understood all the pieces of the puzzle and why professional lawyers and doctors were no longer able to practice. And make no mistake both those professions are inextricably linked.

The Hippocratic Oath has become The Hypocritical Oath. And those who dare to stand up and be counted ... THEY are the ones taking on the lie and taking their accusers to court! Not the other way around as you keep stating in the topic next door!

Can you stop stalking me?

I'm one of the few people here without any fake accounts, it's just me. We can have a differing opinion, we don't all have to agree, but you're starting to dive head first into what the eSaftey Commissioner outlines as cyberbullying.

I don't understand your obsession with me, but it's starting to get uncomfortable.

Stop with the pathetic histrionics which only turn up when you've been pwned!

You should feel uncomfortable when your BS is called out. And you should feel uncomfortable when you post links which undermine the BS you post NOT support it.

You should feel uncomfortable when you're outted for illogic reasoning.

You should feel uncomfortable when you slur others online based on lies which are not substantiated by links you hope people won't click on.

Now .... read my last post. Notice what I stated to you? Stop deflecting and respond to the posts directed at you. Otherwise go post in some cooking topic. And even there you had better not post BS either.

Sorry, dear, you're right. I misread Hypocritical Oath. Good point. I'll head over to the cooking forum.

Miam miam, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139199 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #41 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 3:02pm aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm: bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim the evidence was crystal clear Shall we let FD decide this? Are you man enough to take my challenge? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139199
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #42 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 3:04pm

Dnarever wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:41am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 11:25am:

Gregory is Jim lahey but I believe the marsupial is a separate species

Claiming that Greg is Jim is about the same (maybe less likely) than saying Aquascoot is Lisa.

Are you?

I swear on my mother's life and children's' lives that I don't have socks on this or any other forum.

I'm willing to let FD investigate and then delete the account of the person who's lying.

Strangely, nobody will take me up on my offer.

That tells you everything you need to know.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35023
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #43 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 4:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 3:02pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm:

bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim

the evidence was crystal clear

Shall we let FD decide this?

Are you man enough to take my challenge?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

why would FD get rid of you.

just like "processed junk food " is bad for you but very additctive

"processed junk comments" are bad for you but very addictive.

twitter, facebook, the mainstream media just want "addicted eyeballs'

and most people , living the life of pure garbage, have no interest in meaningful dialogue.

they like one liners and nasty simplistic comments (such as your 120,000) because they are easy to digest.
they arent good for them, but who ever said people do whats good for them

if they did whats good for them they would be into climbing the narrow road to success, not "vibing" with your childish one liners.

still it makes Freediver ad revenue, so he is no different from zuck, jack dorsey and tracey grimshaw

Back to top

IP Logged

Carl D Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9626 Rivervale, Perth Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #44 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 5:18pm aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm: bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim the evidence was crystal clear
Back to top	why-the-hell-isnt-everything-crystal-clear.jpg (59 KB \| 4 ) Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain IP Logged