Australian Politics Forum - Ivermectin study results

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139199
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #45 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 5:20pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 4:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 3:02pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm:

bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim

the evidence was crystal clear

Shall we let FD decide this?

Are you man enough to take my challenge?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

why would FD get rid of you.

He wouldn't, because I don't run socks.

So, up for the challenge?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jim Lahey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2447 Lisa's Merc Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #46 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 5:39pm Looks like horseboy is running away scared again...alpha male indeed...
Back to top	IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 59129 Here Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #47 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 6:46pm aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm: bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim the evidence was crystal clear You have evidence that they are good at pulling your chain.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96417

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #48 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 12:49am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 4:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 3:02pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:11pm:

bobby and myself saw the evidence where bobby posed a question to greg who then replied in the first person but had logged on as jim

the evidence was crystal clear

Shall we let FD decide this?

Are you man enough to take my challenge?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

why would FD get rid of you.

just like "processed junk food " is bad for you but very additctive

"processed junk comments" are bad for you but very addictive.

twitter, facebook, the mainstream media just want "addicted eyeballs'

and most people , living the life of pure garbage, have no interest in meaningful dialogue.

they like one liners and nasty simplistic comments (such as your 120,000) because they are easy to digest.
they arent good for them, but who ever said people do whats good for them

if they did whats good for them they would be into climbing the narrow road to success, not "vibing" with your childish one liners.

still it makes Freediver ad revenue, so he is no different from zuck, jack dorsey and tracey grimshaw

Just so. FD, you're GUILTY. You're mixing our words up, just like Google, Bing and Yahoo.

Aquascoot's finally "woken up."

You?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35023 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #49 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 5:56am FD understands what all media understand. sober rational debate is boring. clickbait and flamewars and being as extreme as possible gets you attention. and the whole internet is based, not on sober education but on attention seeking .
Back to top	IP Logged

Carl D

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9626
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #50 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 10:31am

Guess what? Ivermectin still doesn't work for treating COVID-19.

Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19

March 30, 2022

Quote:

A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.

Quote:

Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.

But, I'm sure aqua and others will still be pushing Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment for the rest of this year (at least).

Back to top

** Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain **

IP Logged

SadKangaroo Gold Member Offline #FightStupid Posts: 17743 Mianjin (Brisbane)	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #51 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 10:41am Watch them ask all the questions they refused to and don't care about when it's a study they can manipulate the findings to attempt to show that it works, even if the auther tells them they cannot reach that conclusion, to try and dismiss this.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96417

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #52 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 1:37pm

aquascoot wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 5:56am:

FD understands what all media understand.

sober rational debate is boring.

clickbait and flamewars and being as extreme as possible gets you attention.

and the whole internet is based, not on sober education but on attention seeking .

Just so. It's FD's business model, after all.

But I'm curious. Which American prez extolled the same virtues?

Do you remember?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139199
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #53 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 1:47pm

Carl D wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 10:31am:

Guess what? Ivermectin still doesn't work for treating COVID-19.

Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19

March 30, 2022

Quote:

A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.

Quote:

Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.

But, I'm sure aqua and others will still be pushing Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment for the rest of this year (at least).

Indeed, but why?

That's what I don't understand.

Why do they want to push a drug that isn't effective?

It makes no sense.

We all want it to work against COVID, that's for sure, but the science shows us it doesn't.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96417

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #54 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 1:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 1:47pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 10:31am:

Guess what? Ivermectin still doesn't work for treating COVID-19.

Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19

March 30, 2022

Quote:

A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.

Quote:

Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.

But, I'm sure aqua and others will still be pushing Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment for the rest of this year (at least).

Indeed, but why?

That's what I don't understand.

Why do they want to push a drug that isn't effective?

It makes no sense.

We all want it to work against COVID, that's for sure, but the science shows us it doesn't.

Oh, that's easy. What do you do to insert the culture wars into a health crisis?

You brand chemicals as virtuous. Hydroxychloraquine, Ivermectin, zinc, vitamin D, all nice, useless medicines that do nothing to stop covid.

But then, who said it was about stopping covid? It's about obeying Dear Leader.

That's all.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139199
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #55 - Apr 1^st, 2022 at 2:10pm

Karnal wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 1:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 1:47pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 1^st, 2022 at 10:31am:

Guess what? Ivermectin still doesn't work for treating COVID-19.

Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19

March 30, 2022

Quote:

A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.

Quote:

Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.

But, I'm sure aqua and others will still be pushing Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment for the rest of this year (at least).

Indeed, but why?

That's what I don't understand.

Why do they want to push a drug that isn't effective?

It makes no sense.

We all want it to work against COVID, that's for sure, but the science shows us it doesn't.

Oh, that's easy. What do you do to insert the culture wars into a health crisis?

You brand chemicals as virtuous. Hydroxychloraquine, Ivermectin, zinc, vitamin D, all nice, useless medicines that do nothing to stop covid.

But then, who said it was about stopping covid? It's about obeying Dear Leader.

That's all.

Yeah, that's the sad bit - these anti-vaxxers have no interest in anybody else's health & welfare.

Back to top

IP Logged