Australian Politics Forum - Ivermectin study results

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18652
Gender: male

Ivermectin study results
Mar 30^th, 2022 at 10:29pm

Yes it's peer reviewed.

It appears they used a very mild dose.

What do the bullshitters say?

Quote:

PEER-REVIEWED

Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching

Conclusions

In a citywide ivermectin program with prophylactic, optional ivermectin use for COVID-19, ivermectin was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates from COVID-19.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a...

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59028
Here
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #1 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 10:50pm

These are the conflicts of interest that the Dr's forgot to mention in the research paper and review process.

You can find articles of Dr Kerr spruiking ivermectin and critical of the Vaccine around 10 to 12 months before this research.

Quote:

Correction
It has come to the attention of the journal that several authors failed to disclose all relevant conflicts of interest when submitting this article. As a result, Cureus is issuing the following erratum and updating the relevant conflict of interest disclosures to ensure these conflicts of interest are properly described as recommended by the ICMJ:

Lucy Kerr: Paid consultant for both Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer, and Médicos Pela Vida (MPV), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Flavio A. Cadegiani: Paid consultant ($1,600.00 USD) for Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer. Dr. Cadegiani is a founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Pierre Kory: President and Chief Medical Officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Dr. Kory reports receiving payments from FLCCC. In February of 2022, Dr. Kory opened a private telehealth fee-based service to evaluate and treat patients with acute COVID, long haul COVID, and post-vaccination syndromes.

Jennifer A. Hibberd: Co-founder of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance and World Council for Health, both of which discourage vaccination and encourage ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Juan J. Chamie-Quintero: Contributor to the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and lists the FLCCC as his employer on his LinkedIn page.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a...

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18652 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #2 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm Clutching at straws again puddle duck? Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin. Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study
Back to top	Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it. IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59028
Here
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #3 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18652
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #4 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he asked Merk to fund a study. Merk said they weren't interested the US Gov gave Merk around $600 million for a new drug.

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

The pandmeic is over it really makes no difference anymore.

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59028
Here
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #5 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:34pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he asked Merk to fund a study. Merk said they weren't interested the US Gov gave Merk around $600 million for a new drug.

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

The pandmeic is over it really makes no difference anymore.

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

Quote:

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

You would blindly believe the results of a study after you find out that likely all the researchers had lied about their conflicts of interest?

What else did they lie about in the paper ?

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59028
Here
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #6 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:37pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he asked Merk to fund a study. Merk said they weren't interested the US Gov gave Merk around $600 million for a new drug.

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

The pandmeic is over it really makes no difference anymore.

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

Quote:

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

You expect him to lie about his Nobel Prize ? Very unlikely.

Why would a Nobel prize be a conflict of interest ? That is just silly. If he lied about a genuine conflict of interest that is very different.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59028
Here
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #7 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:45pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he asked Merk to fund a study. Merk said they weren't interested the US Gov gave Merk around $600 million for a new drug.

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

The pandmeic is over it really makes no difference anymore.

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

Quote:

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

There is currently no valid research that supports the view that the drug is effective on Covid.

This research had to be corrected to show significant conflicts of interest. In fact a little follow up shows that at least the primaries in the research had a pre decided opinion - they had been supporting the use of this drug prior to the research and making a profit from it.

Is the research correct ? Don't know.

Can the research be trusted ? Don't know.

They found the result that they clearly wanted to find.

This group use a shortcut pier review process.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:51pm by Dnarever »

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18652
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #8 - Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:48pm

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he asked Merk to fund a study. Merk said they weren't interested the US Gov gave Merk around $600 million for a new drug.

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

The pandmeic is over it really makes no difference anymore.

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

Quote:

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

There is currently no valid research that supports the view that the drug is effective on Covid.

More bullshit from you i don't know why i bother with idiots like you.

https://ivmmeta.com/ There are no studies that favour control group over Ivermectin.

If you click on Home with that link you will find studies for all the other drugs that have been trialled with covid.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96363

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #9 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 12:42am

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he asked Merk to fund a study. Merk said they weren't interested the US Gov gave Merk around $600 million for a new drug.

There will be a study coming out of Japan shortly done by Mr Omura are you going to claim he has a conflict of interest because of his Nobel prize?

The pandmeic is over it really makes no difference anymore.

Will the assclowns who opposed Ivermectin take responsibility for the deaths that could have been prevented by their opposing it?

Ah. So if it makes no difference, why did you say it?

Not funded by Ivermectin, are you?

Sound the alarm, Aquascoot, we've got a live one on our hands here, dear. Looks like Ivermectin's taken over Google's algorithms too, no? It's controlling Baron's search terms.

Despicable stuff.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40764 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin study results Reply #10 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 2:39am Denying people medicine is a breach of human rights. Whether it would have benefitted them or not, it would not have harmed them, so let them try it https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96363

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #11 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 3:17am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 2:39am:

Denying people medicine is a breach of human rights.

Whether it would have benefitted them or not, it would not have harmed them, so let them try it

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

Exactly. I'd like some horse tranqulizer if you don't mind.

We wouldn't want anyone denying one's equine rights, no?

Deplorable stuff.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34972
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #12 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 5:17am

these results wont appear in a google search.

it is doubtful that the scientists studying this have 5 billion spare to enter into an agreement with google to put this information iinto search results

the people at the TGA wont mention it either.

how can they when it would be political suicide for the government to admit they got it wrong and cost many deaths

it will be buried and the people who are invested in the vaccine (ie nearly everyone) will just double down, call it horse dewormer, call people conspiracy theorists and say

"oh look will smith just punched chris rock" Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

buzzanddidj

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 14212
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #13 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:09am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31^st, 2022 at 5:17am:

these results wont appear in a google search.

How COULD they ?

... when we have

Big Vaccine

conspiring with

Big Newspaper

- in cahoots with

the Illuminati,
the Glitterati, the Rand Corporation, the Freemasons

- and the shape shifting reptile people

all hiding the
REAL cure for COVID19
from us

.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:57am by buzzanddidj »

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'

- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

#FightStupid

Posts: 17636
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Ivermectin study results
Reply #14 - Mar 31^st, 2022 at 7:40am

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:16pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 30^th, 2022 at 11:01pm:

Clutching at straws again puddle duck?

Vitamedic manufacture more than just Ivermectin.

Nearly a quarter of a million people in that study

It isn't me this is the official corrections to the research paper by the Cureus journal and yes it puts doubt on the findings. The researchers lied about their connections with Ivermectin, they were all paid in one way or another by companies producing or recommending and profiting from its use.

It doesn't change the results you're clutching at straws.

Aren't you part of the crowd who instantly dismisses anything if you can show a link, or make up a link, between the author and say Pfizer?

But all of a sudden links like this don't matter if you like the conclusions reached?

We all wanted proof that ivermectin is an effective treatment, it's cheap and we are aware of the known side effects etc.

But if you're not going to apply the same scrutiny to the findings you like about ivermectin as you do the findings you dislike, or say the research done about the vaccines, then it's not proof you're looking for but instead validation.

Don't confuse the two, they're not the same.

Back to top

IP Logged