Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on May 8
th, 2022 at 1:40am:
We're talking about here and now, sonny - so any intervention in a foreign nation 70 years ago is no justification for intervention by new players today?
You are so funny .....
You say you believe in "trading and just getting along", and yet you reject the two schemes vital for that to occur; after WW2, the first envisioned by 'Doc' Evatt, and the 2nd by JM Keynes.
1. Implementing the institutional machinery for outlawing war as a means of dispute settlement between nations (inc. UNSC without veto as envisioned by Evatt).
2. Implementing the institutional machinery to engender fair trade and prosperous development in all nations (via a 'clearing union' and 'Bankor' envisioned by Keynes).
Both schemes were rejected by the great powers (in no1), and a triumphant US (in no.2) , basically proving that instinct (via the reptilian brain) triumphed over rationality...again, despite the catastrophic lesson of WW2.
Quote:When the 'debt crisis' comes into play - trade with you will collapse as well and you will be far worse off.
Me? Are you assuming I am Chinese. I'm neither CCP nor living in China; my task is to expose the West's delusional "freedom"/'individual rights' ideology, and its disastrous consequences on the world's collective well-being.
Quote:You understand fair trade and negotiation as opposed to using money as a tool for world domination?
Yes, as outlined above.
Quote:I see no good coming from the modern trend to dictators.
That trend is because of soaring inequality and collapsing debt-ridden economies around the globe.
Quote:Clearly you miss my repeated posts about 'regions' and the lack of any real need or urgency to trade with them on their terms - Nigeria (black person'ere) is quite at liberty to make its own deals for the benefit of its people... same as Australia with its resources, Kazakhstan with its and so forth - tell me now why they don't?
Nations are not at liberty at all, when they are burdened by debt and unfair trade entrenched by the monetary orthodoxy of the IMF (Instant Misery Fund), and a WTO that has no provisions to foster prosperous development in all nations.
Quote:Here's a clue - because they are all governed by inept and self-serving people who cannot see further than the next batch of dollars coming their way, and who are willing to sell out their country and countrymen in return for dollars to them.
Governed by inept and self-serving people, maybe: but a systems change is needed.
Quote:How is China any different? How is Russia? How is Kazakhstan? How is Nigeria?
They all have different resources, and global oversight mechanisms are needed, as outlined above.
Quote:The STYLE of government here, and there - robber baronism clad in the fine raiments of democracy - needs to be changed - but not its FORM, thank you.
Government is tricky, but failure is not an option, if human civilization is to progress and succeed.
Personally I want to see a friendly competition between adversarial 2-party democracies and China's consensus one-party meritocracy.
Quote:Do you know the difference?
Yes.