Australian Politics Forum - ROE v WADE Overturned

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 46236
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #135 - Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:57pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:46pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist.

That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile.

Typical.

Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he?

So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game.

If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet.

The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki.

But of course you are.

Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?

you, of course.

"I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious.

I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist?

Over to you.

Whoa, paki, not so fast. You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear.

There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas. Start tapdancing.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95781
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #136 - Jul 4^th, 2022 at 10:45pm

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:46pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist.

That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile.

Typical.

Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he?

So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game.

If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet.

The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki.

But of course you are.

Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?

you, of course.

"I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious.

I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist?

Over to you.

Whoa, paki, not so fast. You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear.

There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas. Start tapdancing.

Don't want to say, eh?

We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism.

Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist?

Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely.

I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist?

Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt.

Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist?

Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no?

Are you a racist?

Ooh!

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 4^th, 2022 at 10:50pm by Karnal »

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 46236
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #137 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:10am

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 10:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:46pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist.

That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile.

Typical.

Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he?

So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game.

If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet.

The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki.

But of course you are.

Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?

you, of course.

"I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious.

I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist?

Over to you.

Whoa, paki, not so fast. You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear.

There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas. Start tapdancing.

Don't want to say, eh?

We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism.

Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist?

Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely.

I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist?

Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt.

Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist?

Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no?

Are you a racist?

Ooh!

Everyone is a "wacist" to a wee Gujarati Scot bufty like you who mindlessly and automatically accuses even a black man like Sowell as a "wacist". That reflex stupidly- hastily gleaned and deployed from Wiki - is just an empty cliche and shows that it is nothing but a lazy, all- purpose attack stick for the unthinking. If Sowell is racist then everyone is and the terms of your understanding of "racist" is all-encompassing and includes everyone.
That's how stupid your question is.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95781
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #138 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:21am

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:10am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 10:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:46pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist.

That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile.

Typical.

Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he?

So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game.

If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet.

The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki.

But of course you are.

Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?

you, of course.

"I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious.

I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist?

Over to you.

Whoa, paki, not so fast. You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear.

There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas. Start tapdancing.

Don't want to say, eh?

We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism.

Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist?

Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely.

I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist?

Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt.

Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist?

Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no?

Are you a racist?

Ooh!

Everyone is a "wacist" to a wee Gujarati Scot bufty like you who mindlessly and automatically accuses even a black man like Sowell as a "wacist". That reflex stupidly- hastily gleaned and deployed from Wiki - is just an empty cliche and shows that it is nothing but a lazy, all- purpose attack stick for the unthinking. If Sowell is racist then everyone is and the terms of your understanding of "racist" is all-encompassing and includes everyone.
That's how stupid your question is.

Sowell? Wacist?

Why, old boy, all Sowell ever did was say how not wacist Mr Trump is.

Sowell's no racist, dear boy. He's not wacist.

You?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 46236
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #139 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 11:57am

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:10am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 10:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:46pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist.

That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile.

Typical.

Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he?

So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game.

If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet.

The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki.

But of course you are.

Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?

you, of course.

"I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious.

I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist?

Over to you.

Whoa, paki, not so fast. You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear.

There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas. Start tapdancing.

Don't want to say, eh?

We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism.

Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist?

Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely.

I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist?

Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt.

Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist?

Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no?

Are you a racist?

Ooh!

Everyone is a "wacist" to a wee Gujarati Scot bufty like you who mindlessly and automatically accuses even a black man like Sowell as a "wacist". That reflex stupidly- hastily gleaned and deployed from Wiki - is just an empty cliche and shows that it is nothing but a lazy, all- purpose attack stick for the unthinking. If Sowell is racist then everyone is and the terms of your understanding of "racist" is all-encompassing and includes everyone.
That's how stupid your question is.

Sowell? Wacist?

Why, old boy, all Sowell ever did was say how not wacist Mr Trump is.

Sowell's no racist, dear boy. He's not wacist.

You?

Very ackward tapdancing there, Mustaphaken. You think Trump is wacist. Sowell doesn't. My standing with Sowell on such matters catches me out as silly in your rheumatic, watery, unfocused eyes:

Quote:

Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?
Mustaphaken Twatterati

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95781 Gender:	Re: ROE v WADE Overturned Reply #140 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Do you know what you are, dear boy? You're not racist. So unfair, no?
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 46236
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #141 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:19pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm:

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh?

Do you know what you are, dear boy?

You're not racist.

So unfair, no?

I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell.

You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja? Tap dance on.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #142 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:29pm

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:19pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm:

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh?

Do you know what you are, dear boy?

You're not racist.

So unfair, no?

I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell.

You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja? Tap dance on.

Thomas Sowell is a c

u

nt. So is Candace Owens. You think because some black people are scum, it's not racist for you to be scum. You're wrong

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 46236
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #143 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:38pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:29pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:19pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm:

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh?

Do you know what you are, dear boy?

You're not racist.

So unfair, no?

I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell.

You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja? Tap dance on.

Thomas Sowell is a c

u

nt.

Can you identify ANY particular view of his that is wrong? Or do we need to wait until you get bv back to your 'library'?

Paki, you called your FutureWank friend in a great haste there. Tsk, tsk. You needed the intellectual reinforcement, ja? Cheesy

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95781
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #144 - Jul 5^th, 2022 at 7:55pm

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:38pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:29pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:19pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm:

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh?

Do you know what you are, dear boy?

You're not racist.

So unfair, no?

I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell.

You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja? Tap dance on.

Thomas Sowell is a c

u

nt.

Can you identify ANY particular view of his that is wrong? Or do we need to wait until you get bv back to your 'library'?

Paki, you called your FutureWank friend in a great haste there. Tsk, tsk. You needed the intellectual reinforcement, ja? Cheesy

Oh, you've clearly put him in his place there, old boy. Very droll. Poor old Future's stuck on which part of denying Dear Leader's devout racism is wrong. What next?

Asking him what's wrong with Birtherism? Pizzagate? Trump's four years in office?

What a journey. That's what's so cunning, you see. Nobody knows how to respond. Your howlers render them speechless.

Good show, old boy, good show.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17623
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #145 - Jul 6^th, 2022 at 6:42pm

The problem is that abortion was listed as a privacy issue.
"The misgivings from late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg regarding Roe v. Wade and its susceptibility to come under attack may have ultimately been proven right given the revelations around a leaked opinion draft from the Supreme Court.

The alleged internal document, obtained by Politico, shows that the conservative-majority SCOTUS has provisionally approved to strike down the landmark 1973 ruling that ensures abortion is a constitutional right across the country, along with a subsequent 1992 decision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which largely upheld the decision.

While it may seem unlikely, Ginsburg, the pioneering advocate for women's rights who died in September 2020 at age 87, was a frequent critic of Roe v. Wade, especially its framing and the speed in which it was pushed through.

In a much-quoted lecture she gave at New York University in 1992, Ginsburg noted how Roe was an example of how "Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped...may prove unstable." "

"Ginsburg was in essence disagreeing with Roe's base argument that the right to abortion was based on the privacy of a woman with her doctor, and not a violation of equal protection as guaranteed by the Constitution."

https://www.newsweek.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-wade-abortion-scotus-1702948

Ginsberg was a feminist. All Congress has to do is pass a law on abortion rather than passing it on to unelected officials to oversee.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137581 Gender:	Re: ROE v WADE Overturned Reply #146 - Jul 6^th, 2022 at 7:39pm Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm: Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Of course he's not. Some, I assume, are good people. Nobody's done more for the blacks than Trump. Everybody's saying it.
Back to top	IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 58521 Here Gender:	Re: ROE v WADE Overturned Reply #147 - Jul 6^th, 2022 at 10:48pm Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion.
Back to top	IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12501
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #148 - Jul 6^th, 2022 at 11:03pm

Dnarever wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 10:48pm:

Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion.

The US is the only remaining western nation where cultural (and puritanical) religiosity infests its societal sensibility and its politics.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 58521
Here
Gender: male

Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #149 - Jul 6^th, 2022 at 11:19pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 11:03pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 10:48pm:

Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion.

The US is the only remaining western nation where cultural (and puritanical) religiosity infests its societal sensibility and its politics.

Yes but the supreme court is there to protect the constitution and much of this is in clear breach of the establishment clause of the first amendment.

Back to top

IP Logged