Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Send Topic Print
ROE v WADE Overturned (Read 5664 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58509
Here
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #165 - Jul 12th, 2022 at 1:23am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 12th, 2022 at 1:15am:
Panther wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 11:18am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 11:07am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 10:21am:
AiA wrote on Jul 8th, 2022 at 11:08pm:
Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering...




Good.


it's a good start, but it doesn't restore womens rights to what they were. It's now up to Americans to vote out republicans across the board at the next election and allow the democrats to pass a law that gives them back those rights.


If they want to make Abortion a Right, then they will have to go the Amendment route.....a simple legislative action is only as good as long as it stays in favor of the political party in power, whereas a Constitutional Amendment is the Law of the Land unless amended itself.

Being that amending the US Constitution has only been successful 17 times in over 230 years, it tends to stick when it is......


Let The People Decide??

If that's the way the cards fall - that's the way they fall, but at least if every person is enabled a vote, some genuine consensus will arise...

Same here on many issues.....

I think - though I am always conflicted about this issue and not on religious grounds since I have no religion (me father was Protestant- me mither Catholic - I'm beyond redemption) - I would vote YES to abortion on balance of outcomes.


I think many are conflicted,

Roe V Wade was never pro or anti Abortion. It was a balanced position.

When Roe V Wade passed and later modified by Casey it was believed the outcome would likely be between 20 and 22 weeks. They finished with 24 weeks. IMO this is a bit far in that direction 20 weeks would have been a better balance maybe even 18.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84583
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #166 - Jul 12th, 2022 at 2:06am
 
Dnarever wrote on Jul 12th, 2022 at 1:23am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 12th, 2022 at 1:15am:
Panther wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 11:18am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 11:07am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 10:21am:
AiA wrote on Jul 8th, 2022 at 11:08pm:
Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering...




Good.


it's a good start, but it doesn't restore womens rights to what they were. It's now up to Americans to vote out republicans across the board at the next election and allow the democrats to pass a law that gives them back those rights.


If they want to make Abortion a Right, then they will have to go the Amendment route.....a simple legislative action is only as good as long as it stays in favor of the political party in power, whereas a Constitutional Amendment is the Law of the Land unless amended itself.

Being that amending the US Constitution has only been successful 17 times in over 230 years, it tends to stick when it is......


Let The People Decide??

If that's the way the cards fall - that's the way they fall, but at least if every person is enabled a vote, some genuine consensus will arise...

Same here on many issues.....

I think - though I am always conflicted about this issue and not on religious grounds since I have no religion (me father was Protestant- me mither Catholic - I'm beyond redemption) - I would vote YES to abortion on balance of outcomes.


I think many are conflicted,

Roe V Wade was never pro or anti Abortion. It was a balanced position.

When Roe V Wade passed and later modified by Casey it was believed the outcome would likely be between 20 and 22 weeks. They finished with 24 weeks. IMO this is a bit far in that direction 20 weeks would have been a better balance maybe even 18.




I bow to your knowledge on weeks etc.... I always said that Roe v Wade did not legalise abortion - it de-criminalised it in respect to the woman involved... but nobody else.... it was an each way bet.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11494
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #167 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:04pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 12th, 2022 at 2:06am:
Dnarever wrote on Jul 12th, 2022 at 1:23am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 12th, 2022 at 1:15am:
Panther wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 11:18am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 11:07am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 10:21am:
AiA wrote on Jul 8th, 2022 at 11:08pm:
Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering...




Good.


it's a good start, but it doesn't restore womens rights to what they were. It's now up to Americans to vote out republicans across the board at the next election and allow the democrats to pass a law that gives them back those rights.


If they want to make Abortion a Right, then they will have to go the Amendment route.....a simple legislative action is only as good as long as it stays in favor of the political party in power, whereas a Constitutional Amendment is the Law of the Land unless amended itself.

Being that amending the US Constitution has only been successful 17 times in over 230 years, it tends to stick when it is......


Let The People Decide??

If that's the way the cards fall - that's the way they fall, but at least if every person is enabled a vote, some genuine consensus will arise...

Same here on many issues.....

I think - though I am always conflicted about this issue and not on religious grounds since I have no religion (me father was Protestant- me mither Catholic - I'm beyond redemption) - I would vote YES to abortion on balance of outcomes.


I think many are conflicted,

Roe V Wade was never pro or anti Abortion. It was a balanced position.

When Roe V Wade passed and later modified by Casey it was believed the outcome would likely be between 20 and 22 weeks. They finished with 24 weeks. IMO this is a bit far in that direction 20 weeks would have been a better balance maybe even 18.




I bow to your knowledge on weeks etc.... I always said that Roe v Wade did not legalise abortion - it de-criminalised it in respect to the woman involved... but nobody else.... it was an each way bet.


It was Legislating from the Bench.....make a Right that didn't exist, into a Right that shouldn't exist.....it took almost 50 years to correct that errant court that legislated at the request of a majority.....Democracy....Mob Rule.....where 50% + 1 is given the power to reign Tyranny over the minority. Not only was the Roe decision completely wrong, it was itself Unconstitutional according to the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Today, the Power to rule regarding Abortion rests solely with the States, as it should, in the hands of the People of each individual State to decide..........

➤ If the Pro-Abortion lot want to have a RIGHT to an Abortion, then they must offer an Amendment as per Article V of the US Constitution, & if the American People really want it, they can then make it a RIGHT via the Constitution's Amendment Process.....until then.....States Rule..........
Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #168 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:11pm
 
Panther wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:04pm:
It was Legislating from the Bench.....make a Right that didn't exist, into a Right that shouldn't exist.....it took almost 50 years to correct that errant court that legislated at the request of a majority.....Democracy....Mob Rule.....where 50% + 1 is given the power to reign Tyranny over the minority. Not only was the Roe decision completely wrong, it was itself Unconstitutional according to the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Today, the Power to rule regarding Abortion rests solely with the States, as it should, in the hands of the People of each individual State to decide..........

➤ If the Pro-Abortion lot want to have a RIGHT to an Abortion, then they must offer an Amendment as per Article V of the US Constitution, & if the American People really want it, they can then make it a RIGHT via the Constitution's Amendment Process.....until then.....States Rule..........


The fact is, it was a weird way to give people a right they naturally should have.  And of course America hates women
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11494
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #169 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:46pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:11pm:
Panther wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:04pm:
It was Legislating from the Bench.....make a Right that didn't exist, into a Right that shouldn't exist.....it took almost 50 years to correct that errant court that legislated at the request of a majority.....Democracy....Mob Rule.....where 50% + 1 is given the power to reign Tyranny over the minority. Not only was the Roe decision completely wrong, it was itself Unconstitutional according to the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Today, the Power to rule regarding Abortion rests solely with the States, as it should, in the hands of the People of each individual State to decide..........

➤ If the Pro-Abortion lot want to have a RIGHT to an Abortion, then they must offer an Amendment as per Article V of the US Constitution, & if the American People really want it, they can then make it a RIGHT via the Constitution's Amendment Process.....until then.....States Rule..........


The fact is, it was a weird way to give people a right they naturally should have.  And of course America hates women


Your opinion, but that Court was still Constitutionally Incorrect.....& finally this present day Court fixed the error, & returned the power over Abortion back to the individual American States where it was before Roe, & where it rightfully belonged in the first place.....not an opinion....FACT....


Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #170 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:47pm
 
Panther wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:46pm:
Your opinion, but that Court was still Constitutionally Incorrect.....& finally this present day Court fixed the error, & returned the power over Abortion back to the individual States where it was before Roe, & where it rightfully belonged in the first place.....not an opinion....FACT....




This is obviously bullshit.  But the fact some states hate women is clearly the main issue
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17621
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #171 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:51pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:47pm:
This is obviously bullshit. 


So you disagree with Ginsberg. Are you a lawyer too? Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #172 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm
 
lee wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:51pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:47pm:
This is obviously bullshit. 


So you disagree with Ginsberg. Are you a lawyer too? Roll Eyes


The whole premise is bullshit TBH.  What did the sexist old men who wrote the constitution think about something that didn't exist in their lifetime, because that's what we need to do?  Christ.

And the Supreme Court clearly is ideological, it uses legalese to pursue a political agenda
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11494
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #173 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:56pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:47pm:
Panther wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:46pm:
Your opinion, but that Court was still Constitutionally Incorrect.....& finally this present day Court fixed the error, & returned the power over Abortion back to the individual States where it was before Roe, & where it rightfully belonged in the first place.....not an opinion....FACT....




This is obviously bullshit.  But the fact some states hate women is clearly the main issue


Then, the People of these States have the power to change their law, unlike the US Constitution process, by simply voting for legislatures that will change their local abortion legislation to say otherwise. Until then.......it's the State Law......don't like it.....move to a pro-abortion State....


God Bless
The United States Constitution
............
God Bless
AMERICA
............
God Bless
The United States Constitution
............
God Bless
AMERICA
............
God Bless
The United States Constitution
............
God Bless
AMERICA
............
God Bless
The United States Constitution
............
God Bless
AMERICA
............
God Bless
The United States Constitution
............
God Bless
AMERICA
............
God Bless
The United States Constitution
............
AMERICA
............
Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17621
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #174 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:59pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
The whole premise is bullshit TBH.


What is bullshit? Huh


FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
What did the sexist old men who wrote the constitution think about something that didn't exist in their lifetime, because that's what we need to do? 


So amend the Constitution. That is where laws should be made. Roll EyesFutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
And the Supreme Court clearly is ideological, it uses legalese to pursue a political agenda


And that is why they shouldn't try to make laws that aren't in the Constitution. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #175 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:01pm
 
Panther wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:56pm:
Then, the People of these States have the power to change their law, unlike the US Constitution process, by simply voting for legislatures that will change their local abortion legislation to say otherwise. Until then.......it's the State Law......don't like it.....move to a pro-abortion State....



Or a civilised country?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #176 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:02pm
 
lee wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:59pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
The whole premise is bullshit TBH.


What is bullshit? Huh
I told you



FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
What did the sexist old men who wrote the constitution think about something that didn't exist in their lifetime, because that's what we need to do? 


So amend the Constitution. That is where laws should be made. Roll Eyes 
Under this broken system, yes


FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
And the Supreme Court clearly is ideological, it uses legalese to pursue a political agenda


And that is why they shouldn't try to make laws that aren't in the Constitution. Roll Eyes
Why not though? You didn't refute me





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11494
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #177 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:04pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:01pm:
Panther wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:56pm:
Then, the People of these States have the power to change their law, unlike the US Constitution process, by simply voting for legislatures that will change their local abortion legislation to say otherwise. Until then.......it's the State Law......don't like it.....move to a pro-abortion State....



Or a civilised country?


Anywhere,  except that State where they don't like the 'local' laws.....

Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46223
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #178 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:11pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:52pm:
lee wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:51pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 1:47pm:
This is obviously bullshit. 


So you disagree with Ginsberg. Are you a lawyer too? Roll Eyes


The whole premise is bullshit TBH.  What did the sexist old men who wrote the constitution think about something that didn't exist in their lifetime,




Cheesy
Gawd, you are ignorant and stupid. And you flaunt it, ratty on uppers, you are proud of it.



47
It is thus apparent that at common law, at the time of the adoption of our Constitution, and throughout the major portion of the 19th century, abortion was viewed with less disfavor than under most American statutes currently in effect. Phrasing it another way, a woman enjoyed a substantially broader right to terminate a pregnancy than she does in most States today. At least with respect to the early stage of pregnancy, and very possibly without such a limitation, the opportunity to make this choice was present in this country well into the 19th century. Even later, the law continued for some time to treat less punitively an abortion procured in early pregnancy.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113/USSC_PRO_410_113_70-18
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: ROE v WADE Overturned
Reply #179 - Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:13pm
 
Frank wrote on Jul 13th, 2022 at 2:11pm:
Gawd, you are ignorant and stupid. And you flaunt it, ratty on uppers, you are proud of it.



Abortion in the way it's done now, plus the idea of women's sexual freedom, did not exist at the time.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Send Topic Print