John Smith wrote on Jul 11
th, 2022 at 2:23pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 11
th, 2022 at 12:55pm:
I already said that
only after you embarressed yourself and realised your mistake
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 11
th, 2022 at 12:55pm:
YOU were the one carrying on about the innocent passerby being guilty, so wake up and stop shooting yourself in the feet.
making crap up again crappler? Where did I say that?
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 11
th, 2022 at 12:55pm:
"So if you are walking along on the footpath and some driver is distracted by your choice of clothes, and leads to him crashing and killing a pedestrian, you agree you should also be found guilty as an accomplice?" Your statement.
no, that's not a statement, it's a question. The give away is the question mark at the end.
Do you fail English?
"So if you are walking along on the footpath and some driver is distracted by your choice of clothes, and leads to him crashing and killing a pedestrian, you agree you should also be found guilty as an accomplice?"Your comparison piece has zero association with the events. No meaning to it at all. Now stop wasting time and clogging up the strand with your nonsense.
I didn't agree to any of it... told you it didn't work that way and had no relevance to the issue under discussion.
Give it up. You go over and over the same ground desperately trying to make some point that exists only in your own head. You're like a schoolkid.
If these other guys went along with those found guilty, knowing what the intention was - to rob etc someone - they are guilty of a lesser offence. Simple as that. At no point did I say that the court was wrong or anything else - I said from the start that we needed the full story. Simple enough for you?
Christ you waste time and energy on your ravings.