AusGeoff wrote on Oct 1
st, 2022 at 5:47pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30
th, 2022 at 6:59pm:
AusGeoff wrote on Sep 30
th, 2022 at 2:30pm:
From the study I referenced earlier...
Quote:For this study, they looked at the DNA of 13 transgender males, individuals
born female and transitioning to male, and 17 transgender females, born
male and transitioning to female.
The extensive whole exome analysis, which sequences all the protein-coding
regions of a gene (protein expression determines gene and cell function) was
performed at the Yale Center for Genome Analysis. The analysis was confirmed
by Sanger sequencing, another method used for detecting gene variants.
The variants they found were not present in a group of 88 control exome
studies in nontransgender individuals also done at Yale. They also were rare
or absent in large control DNA databases.
The "exome" is the protein-coding regions of genes in a genome.
Your final comment sounds definitive - the study made it clear that it was 'might', 'maybe' and 'could' ... huge difference and this is the trap that the unwary fall into. There was nothing definitive about it - yet that final comment sounds as if there is...
It's difficult to argue against the actual science of genomics. The facts
are there, regardless of you're opinions of science—which seem pretty
negative, biassed, and unevidenced. I note that apart from a couple
of one-liners, you haven't presented any accredited scientific references
that would support your own claims about genomics. Why is that?
The initial research results were also confirmed by Sanger sequencing,
an analysis performed on a comparative basis, where the subject
electropherogram is compared against an electropherogram from a
DNA sample
without a mutation.
In a nutshell then, mutations in specific gene patters can in fact be a causal
factor in transgender subjects, which means yes—
one can be born with a
propensity to become a transgender as an adult.
I haven't discussed genomics - I have posted several actual studies that pretty much say that the 'science' is not yet in sufficiently to be leaping ahead with the Great Tranny Revolution and that clinics are just taking some kid's word for their personal alleged feeling as being sufficient to start the process.
You need to read all the links I post and that last one especially. It covers a lot of ground, and the study linked about the possible 'from birth' does say just that it MIGHT be the case in its own prelude.
As I said - you have to read everything they posit.... not just what they are studying.
My approach to science is far more rigorous than some here, who leap on any unfounded statement as being the absolute truth, as long as it suits their position.
I repeat - the 'science' on trannies is NOT in, and there are countless areas that need a lot more research before it becomes another runaway train - especially when it comes to young people - some as young as eight, as that compilation of data and facts I posted shows - and that WAS 2021-22.....
Seriously - some dork running around accusing people of wanting to kill his kids because of, not their gender preferences, but his own madness aggravated by past clashes he has most likely created - is NOT the way to discuss such issues.
Read the entire thing at your leisure:-
https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/gender-dysphoria-in-children-risking-harm-from-well-...https://www.bbc.com/news/health-56601386Look at the cases developing in other countries over 'transition on demand' and what it has caused, and about the actual ethics of 'clinics' advocating and carrying out these procedures. Look at the madness developing out of this 'gender identity' insanity ....
https://twitter.com/moleatthedoor/status/1576007738316197889/photo/1https://twitter.com/Martina/status/1575151797345419271?cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%...