Australian Politics Forum

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75191
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #360 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:47pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:44pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:40pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:36pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:34pm:

Shitting on your neighbours lawn is not so natural, having gay sex on your neighbours lawn is not so natural.

Now you're going to have to argue why it is not natural, without defining 'natural' as a synonym for 'moral'.

because front lawns are not natural. They're a man made constructs.

So shitting in a toilet bowl is unnatural?

Yes. It's a social construct that is taught.

So shitting in a toilet bowl is unnatural, shitting in a lawn is unnatural.

So 'natural' means what? Anything brought into existence by human creativity is your definition of unnatural?

Is human creativity unnatural?

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #361 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:10pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:06pm:

Boris wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:49pm:

Its 1.5% of the population

and they do not matter

The then largest and most thorough survey in Australia was conducted by telephone interview with 19,307 respondents between the ages of 16 and 59 in 2001/2002. The study found that 97.4% of men identified as heterosexual, 1.6% as homosexual and 0.9% as bisexual. For women 97.7% identified as heterosexual, 0.8% as lesbian and 1.4% as bisexual.

And this thread gets funnier.

Boris goes to Wikipedia for answers (though doesn't cite his source) and quotes the 2001/2002 entry.

Shall we look at the 2020 one also/

2020
A study conducted by BioMed Central estimated that 3.6% of males and 3.4% of females were gay, lesbian, bisexual, or another sexual minority.[27]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation#Australia

Yeah various studies come in between 3 and 4%

And rising.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13358
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #362 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:12pm

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:06pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:57pm:

So shitting in a toilet bowl is unnatural, shitting in a lawn is unnatural.

So 'natural' means what? Anything brought into existence by human creativity is your definition of unnatural?

Is human creativity unnatural?

You are using 'natural' as a test. We're pointing out that is stupid

No I'm using the Socratic method.

You may be trying but you're failing.

You've watched a lot of documentaries in lieu of formal education, yes?

Ah, she's back.

Your internal rage too much to control, eh.

Now, about them pipes of yours.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #363 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:13pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:06pm:

No I'm using the Socratic method.

The Socratic method (also known as method of Elenchus, elenctic method, or Socratic debate) is a form of cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions.

No you're not. You're ignoring facts, and posting non stop to keep the dialogue going about gay sex

The Socratic method doesn't involve attempting to demean and belittle in lieu of constructive argument.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #364 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:13pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:12pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:06pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 3:57pm:

So shitting in a toilet bowl is unnatural, shitting in a lawn is unnatural.

So 'natural' means what? Anything brought into existence by human creativity is your definition of unnatural?

Is human creativity unnatural?

You are using 'natural' as a test. We're pointing out that is stupid

No I'm using the Socratic method.

You may be trying but you're failing.

You've watched a lot of documentaries in lieu of formal education, yes?

Ah, she's back.

Your internal rage too much to control, eh.

Now, about them pipes of yours.

No. I'm between clients.
]
Have you stepped away from your computer at all?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13358 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #365 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm: you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #366 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:15pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.

*read .. "You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict me.'

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13358 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #367 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:13pm: No. I'm between clients. Have you stepped away from your computer at all? Between clients eh. That's what they're calling it now? Stepped away from your computer at all? Hardly. I wouldn't be able to do my job.
Back to top	IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13358
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #368 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.

*read .. "You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict me.'

Feel free to define 'natural' yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #369 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:18pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:13pm:

No. I'm between clients.

Have you stepped away from your computer at all?

Between clients eh. That's what they're calling it now?

Stepped away from your computer at all? Hardly. I wouldn't be able to do my job.

Well you've certainly been here a whole lot more than me ... i mean, you noticed that i'd left and came back.

Didn't think that one all the way through dd you champ.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #370 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:19pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.

*read .. "You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict me.'

Feel free to define 'natural' yourself.

Occurring or derived from nature.

Now that wasn't hard, was it.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13358
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #371 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:20pm

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:19pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.

*read .. "You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict me.'

Feel free to define 'natural' yourself.

Occurring or derived from nature.

Now that wasn't hard, was it.

Is it natural to sh!t in a toilet bowl? Is it natural to sh!t on a lawn?

BTW you haven't defined natural. You've said six is half a dozen.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #372 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:21pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:20pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:19pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.

*read .. "You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict me.'

Feel free to define 'natural' yourself.

Occurring or derived from nature.

Now that wasn't hard, was it.

Is it natural to sh!t in a toilet bowl? Is it natural to sh!t on a lawn?

Are toilet bowls or lawns natural?

Jesus. These ridiculous strawmen.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35585 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #373 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:22pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:20pm: BTW you haven't defined natural. You've said six is half a dozen. I'm sorry you don't understand it. See? This can be one of the pitfalls of being self-taught.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13358
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #374 - Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:24pm

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:21pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:20pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:19pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 18^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

you need to stop all this straw grasping and either find a new argument, or accept that your argument about shitting on a lawn being natural is wrong

No. You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict itself.

*read .. "You cannot define natural such that your definition of 'natural' doesn't contradict me.'

Feel free to define 'natural' yourself.

Occurring or derived from nature.

Now that wasn't hard, was it.

Is it natural to sh!t in a toilet bowl? Is it natural to sh!t on a lawn?

Are toilet bowls or lawns natural?

Jesus. These ridiculous strawmen.

No. Socratic method. You've opened up another requirement for definition with your 'six is half a dozen' defintion.

All things are derived from nature aren't they?

Back to top

IP Logged