Australian Politics Forum

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75182
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #615 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:40am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:26am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:19am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:17am:

It is what I have been saying for pages.

But, imposing what happens in animal nature to justify human behaviour is where it went sideways, because animals can't conform to a moral code; only humans can do that.

Then why did you start crying about gay people? There is no one moral code. There are tons of moral codes, making them situational and irrelevant.

Madam, it is not normative for non-effeminate men to cry all the time. You'll need to take my word on that or socialise with non-effeminate men.

I have read over these pages how little people comprehend what they mean when they write it.

I said gay sex is not normative (normative as defined above), which is not imposing morality into it.

Most posters here went straight to a non sequitur by imposing morality on that statement.

actually it was you who decided to link natural with morality (or was it normal with morality) ..anyway it was one of them

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75182 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #616 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:42am MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:42am: 'Animals do it, so it must be OK' except no one actually said that.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13343
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #617 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:15pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:36am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 19^th, 2022 at 6:22pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 19^th, 2022 at 6:06pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 19^th, 2022 at 5:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 19^th, 2022 at 5:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 19^th, 2022 at 5:04pm:

So, now there's a difference between unnatural (toilet) and unnatural (lawn) and weakens the argument that lawn shitting is unnatural relative to toilet shitting.

WTF are you on about now. They're BOTH unnatural because they're both man made constructs. You're really getting desperate with this crap

You're not up with this.

By your definition, sex in a bed is unnatural. Shitting in a toilet is unnatural. Wheren do you bugger and sh!t that would satisfy your sense of what is natural? In a tree having made a nest?

I'm happy to poo in an unnatural place. Why do I need to find somewhere natural to do it? I'm not the one who gets offended by the 'unnatural'.

OK, but where is natural to you? In a jungle? the savannah?

anywhere that is not man made Roll Eyes

Yes, well. that includes up a tree..

Have you done that?

Would you be OK to you taking a walk in a park to find people up trees taking a sh!t?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:31pm by MeisterEckhart »

IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6625 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #618 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:16pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6625 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #619 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:16pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:15pm: Yes, well. that includes up a tree. You just get more ridiculous
Back to top	IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13343
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #620 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:26pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:40am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:26am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:19am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:17am:

It is what I have been saying for pages.

But, imposing what happens in animal nature to justify human behaviour is where it went sideways, because animals can't conform to a moral code; only humans can do that.

Then why did you start crying about gay people? There is no one moral code. There are tons of moral codes, making them situational and irrelevant.

Madam, it is not normative for non-effeminate men to cry all the time. You'll need to take my word on that or socialise with non-effeminate men.

I have read over these pages how little people comprehend what they mean when they write it.

I said gay sex is not normative (normative as defined above), which is not imposing morality into it.

Most posters here went straight to a non sequitur by imposing morality on that statement.

actually it was you who decided to link natural with morality (or was it normal with morality) ..anyway it was one of them

No it wasn't. Read back. A certain poster threw in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour.

I wrote, (that if we were throwing in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour), then we can all take a sh!t on the neighbours lawn as well (reductio ad absurdum).

Back to top

IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #621 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:32pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:26pm:

No it wasn't. Read back. A certain poster threw in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour.

I wrote, (that if we were throwing in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour), then we can all take a sh!t on the neighbours lawn as well (reductio ad absurdum).

Yes, you did, didn't you? Like an idiot

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13343 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #622 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:33pm John Smith wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:42am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:42am: 'Animals do it, so it must be OK' except no one actually said that. Yes they did. Read back.
Back to top	IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6625 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #623 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:34pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:33pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:42am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:42am: 'Animals do it, so it must be OK' except no one actually said that. Yes they did. Read back. I didn't say ok, moron. I said natural. OK is a value judgement, which is irrelevant
Back to top	IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13343
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #624 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:39pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:32pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:26pm:

No it wasn't. Read back. A certain poster threw in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour.

I wrote, (that if we were throwing in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour), then we can all take a sh!t on the neighbours lawn as well (reductio ad absurdum).

Yes, you did, didn't you? Like an idiot

Your arms flapping are they?

Taking a hare-brained proposal and taking it to its logical conclusion...

For someone who spends this much time on just one forum, and at 53 years old, you've got the debating skills of a teenage girl.

Back to top

IP Logged

Boris Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4087 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #625 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:40pm 1.6% or 3% who cares disgusting pigs
Back to top	IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #626 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:41pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:39pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:32pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:26pm:

No it wasn't. Read back. A certain poster threw in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour.

I wrote, (that if we were throwing in animal behaviour to justify human behaviour), then we can all take a sh!t on the neighbours lawn as well (reductio ad absurdum).

Yes, you did, didn't you? Like an idiot

Your arms flapping are they?

Taking a hare-brained proposal and taking it to its logical conclusion...

For someone who spends this much time on just one forum, and at 53 years old, you've got the debating skills of a teenage girl.

how would you know when you're scared to debate me? I, again, raised another line of discussion if you couldn't understand how mammals work, and you ignored it, at least four times

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 13343
Gender: male

Re: Poo jabbing
Reply #627 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:41pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:34pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 11:42am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 9:42am:

'Animals do it, so it must be OK'

except no one actually said that.

Yes they did. Read back.

I didn't say ok, moron. I said natural. OK is a value judgement, which is irrelevant

Then why did you bring it up?

Back to top

IP Logged

FutureTheLeftWant Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6625 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #628 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:41pm Boris wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:40pm: 1.6% or 3% who cares disgusting pigs You are a Nazi and you care about sex, that everyone does, based on body parts? LOL!!!
Back to top	IP Logged

MeisterEckhart Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13343 Gender:	Re: Poo jabbing Reply #629 - Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:43pm FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 20^th, 2022 at 2:41pm: how would you know when you're scared to debate me? I, again, raised another line of discussion if you couldn't understand how mammals work, and you ignored it, at least four times You don't debate, you bitch like an effeminate male.
Back to top	IP Logged