Jake Winker Frogen wrote on Jul 15^th, 2022 at 7:02pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 15^th, 2022 at 8:57pm:


Let me elaborate Aussie.

The Supreme Court just struck down Roe vs Wade.

The majority did so on the original intent argument of constitutional interpretation.

That there are no implied rights, if it is not spelled out it does not exist in the constitution.

Of course abortion, or even human privacy is not mentioned in the constitution at all.

But just a few days before the same court struck down a New York law prohibiting concealed carry of a weapon.

The Second Amendment says nothing, not one word or syllable about concealed carry.

Indeed it says the right must be "well regulated."

So what we have here is a Supreme Court that has no coherent constitutional theory and is just going off their political gut feelings issue to issue.

Yes, I think I would have made a great law talking guy.

And I am running out of human time to prove it.

Still, there is time.

Some here have arrested development.... just development diverse, you know..

The thing is most sane, civil, play by the rules life does not seem that sane, humane or even a considered life to me.

That may just be me.

I do not see the convention of things as all that sane.

Back in the olden days i got arrestet for having a match box full of marijuana and i gave them sh!t because i had had a few beers as well so they dragged me into a cell and beat the crap out of me but no real damage so i have been good since then.

Jake Winker Frogen wrote on Jul 15^th, 2022 at 9:05pm:


I have made that point on a Yank Forum, often.

But.....Frogbone, your point is not of a 'law talking' kind at all.  It is a recognition of politics talking on SCOTUS and how the US of A is fundamentally fuqqed because of the naked, blatant politicisation of judicial appointments which overlays a Constitution waaaaaaaay past its use by date.

Try telling the Yank rednecks that on their own dung hill!