Frank wrote on Apr 26
th, 2023 at 4:36pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 26
th, 2023 at 3:31pm:
Bobby. wrote on Apr 26
th, 2023 at 2:55pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 26
th, 2023 at 2:49pm:
The thread is of course a dead-end and only good for a laugh, because the terms are not - and cannot be - clearly defined.
Which is why deluded ideologues can have a field day....
It's clearly defined in the opening post.
forgiven
namaste
Thanks.
"While Marx's Communist Manifesto focused on the alleged class struggle between bourgeois (owners of the means of production) and proletariat (workers)..."Not "alleged", the struggle was real - with workers' kids forced to forgo education and work in coal mines to supplement the family's income..
"Marx did address culture, which he intimated would change after his economic vision was implemented."So "cultural marxism" was defined by others
who came after him. ..eg:
" Patrick Buchanan argues that Cultural Marxism succeeded where Marx failed.[7] Marxism has permeated the American Left."[8]And I'll argue that's waffle serving Buchanan's purposes, since "the means of production" have changed markedly since Marx's day, including increasing automation and the need for government intervention in markets, to avoid social revolution.
Silly as usual.
Waiting for the substantive argument...
Quote:Marxist analysis and methodology are the foundation of the lefty, progressive ideology.
Well, "lefty progressive ideology" has many manifestations, does Albo comply? Today Albo is sounding like the neoclassical-trained economist he is.
Quote: The engine of this ideology is not and never has been the proletariat, the working class. It has always been the intelligentsia: academics, media commentators, artists, writers, journalists.
But note: RW populists like Howard, Johnson, and Trump have cleverly captured the working class ("Howard's battlers") because neoclassical economists have destroyed the post-war Keynesian 'welfare state'.
Quote:As an economist, Marx and his followers are negligible.
Marx is one of the most influential
writers in history, if not as an economist. Some of his followers started revolutions in Russia and China (though not what Marx had in mind).
Quote:As cultural agitators they are formidable since they frame social and cultural discourse as a perpetual dialectical struggle: class struggle, race, gender, colonial, generational struggle, [your antagonism here] struggle.
Yes, because central bankers have bamboozled everyone re the nature of money, which means we are all forever pitted against one another and - as "taxpayers", the government itself.