The problem here is China practice real democracy, whereas countries like America and Australia do not.
Democracy means rule of the people for the people (democratic outcome), it does not mean having a vote for the figurehead president (democratic process).
As a result, Chinese government policies cares far more about long term well being of the majority, and officials are regularly reprimanded and punished for under performance.
By contrast, elected western government serves the interest in the upper class oligarchs or their colonial masters, but cares very little for the common folks. Just look at Taiwan, Detroit and Portland.
Any educated Chinese will understand why the western electoral system does deliver democracy, because this system surrendered power of the state to rich oligarchs who pull the string from behind. All of the western 'free' media is paid for and controlled by the bourgeoisie, as are the eventual election outcome.
Who in the right mind believe that a senile old man clearly suffering from dementia can effectively rule over the wealthiest country in the world, making difficult decisions on the most complex of issues. He can't, instead a bunch of unelected faceless nameless people makes those decisions for him. The elected person just acts like the president, but don't expect he can function like one.
Comrade, if you really believe this shite you are a fcukstick. However I suspect that you don't and you are only here to create drama.