Leaving aside whether there’s a significant minority who don’t accept British values, liberal democracy, elements of the universal rule of law and the like, British services simply can’t keep up with the demands of this influx.

The British voted to leave the EU in part to regain control of their immigration program.

The Conservatives, especially under Boris Johnson, failed utterly to regain that control and deliver the lower immigration they promised. More than anything, that’s why the Conservatives lost office so resoundingly.

Despite the high-publicity expulsions, Starmer’s government is taking actions that will make the problem worse. It’s reinstating the right of people who arrive illegally to eventually claim citizenship. It has also made it clear that there are no circumstances under which it will leave the European Convention on Human Rights. Because that document is so vaguely worded, highly liberal British courts interpret abstract nouns in such a way as to stymie government efforts at enforcement, no matter what the electorate wants.
Ibid.



Trump is regaining control of the border - and boy! do the wanker Bbwianesque ruinations and underminers of the West hate him for it!

The British government was prevented from deporting a convicted Albanian criminal back to Albania. It was deemed that such a deportation would prevent his enjoying a normal family life, which is guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights, of which Britain is still, balefully, a member.

The Albanian criminal’s 10-year-old son, the immigration tribunal was told, was sensitive to certain types of food. According to British press reports the only example given was that he didn’t like “foreign chicken nuggets”. So the immigration tribunal ruled it would be “unduly harsh” to remove the father from Britain as the son might go with him and suffer the indignity of foreign chicken nuggets. Therefore the Albanian criminal could stay in England. The case is ongoing.

In another case, a Nigerian woman who came to Britain in 2011 had failed in eight attempts to secure asylum status. Each time she appealed and was granted further time. Several years after her arrival in Britain she joined a group regarded as a terrorist outfit in Nigeria, the Indigenous People of Biafra.

According to British media reports, the court ruled eventually that she had joined that group solely to establish, under the international refugee convention, that she suffered “a well-grounded fear of persecution” should she return. Although the court determined her motive was to gain asylum status, it nonetheless also ruled that, because she had joined that group, she would indeed suffer persecution if returned home and so she was granted asylum in Britain.

In a third case a family of Gazans was able to convince a court to grant them residency under a program the government set up explicitly to allow Ukrainians to come to Britain.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/8528/trQvAo.jpg