Australian Politics Forum

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103262 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Immigration Reply #870 - Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:23pm ‘All of us are paying the price’: Steve Price says Melbourne and Sydney ‘are full’
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: Immigration
Reply #871 - Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:51pm

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE

Whitlam was elected to become the Prime Minister of Australia. He commanded the greatest number of seats in the house of Representatives. Under the Westminster system that made him Prime Minister, Soren. The Senate decided to not obey the PM and threw a spanner in the works and refused to pass the Supply Bill to finance the Government. The GG decided to intervene and caused a Double Dissolution to occur. The replacement Government in the meantime passed the Supply Bill as it stood. Fraser acted improperly and Kerr acted improperly. Whitlam was turfed out on his ear. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103262 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Immigration Reply #872 - Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:55pm Is this our future? Are we going to be like Hong Kong to have enough housing? https://imgur.com/gallery/IbIZGTz
Back to top	IP Logged

goosecat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 619	Re: Immigration Reply #873 - Mar 29^th, 2024 at 11:10pm Bobby. wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:23pm: ‘All of us are paying the price’: Steve Price says Melbourne and Sydney ‘are full’ O Oh, Waleed the career killer is not gonna want him back on the panel now
Back to top	« Last Edit: Mar 29^th, 2024 at 11:21pm by goosecat » IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103262 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Immigration Reply #874 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:06am goosecat wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 11:10pm: O Oh, Waleed the career killer is not gonna want him back on the panel now yes: https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/the-projects-waleed-aly...
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 44861
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #875 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:44am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE

Whitlam was elected to become the Prime Minister of Australia. He commanded the greatest number of seats in the house of Representatives. Under the Westminster system that made him Prime Minister, Soren. The Senate decided to not obey the PM and threw a spanner in the works and refused to pass the Supply Bill to finance the Government. The GG decided to intervene and caused a Double Dissolution to occur. The replacement Government in the meantime passed the Supply Bill as it stood. Fraser acted improperly and Kerr acted improperly. Whitlam was turfed out on his ear. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

The Australian people turfed him out on 13 December 1975. He lost half of Labor's seats. They could have reelected him if he was really that great. They didn't because he wasn't.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 44861
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #876 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:44am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE

Whitlam was elected to become the Prime Minister of Australia. He commanded the greatest number of seats in the house of Representatives. Under the Westminster system that made him Prime Minister, Soren. The Senate decided to not obey the PM and threw a spanner in the works and refused to pass the Supply Bill to finance the Government. The GG decided to intervene and caused a Double Dissolution to occur. The replacement Government in the meantime passed the Supply Bill as it stood. Fraser acted improperly and Kerr acted improperly. Whitlam was turfed out on his ear. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

The Australian people turfed him out on 13 December 1975. He lost half of Labor's seats. They could have reelected him if he was really that great. They didn't because he wasn't.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 44861
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #877 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:45am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE

Whitlam was elected to become the Prime Minister of Australia. He commanded the greatest number of seats in the house of Representatives. Under the Westminster system that made him Prime Minister, Soren. The Senate decided to not obey the PM and threw a spanner in the works and refused to pass the Supply Bill to finance the Government. The GG decided to intervene and caused a Double Dissolution to occur. The replacement Government in the meantime passed the Supply Bill as it stood. Fraser acted improperly and Kerr acted improperly. Whitlam was turfed out on his ear. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

The Australian people turfed him out on 13 December 1975. He lost half of Labor's seats. They could have reelected him if he was really that great. They didn't because he wasn't.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 44861
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #878 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:46am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE

Whitlam was elected to become the Prime Minister of Australia. He commanded the greatest number of seats in the house of Representatives. Under the Westminster system that made him Prime Minister, Soren. The Senate decided to not obey the PM and threw a spanner in the works and refused to pass the Supply Bill to finance the Government. The GG decided to intervene and caused a Double Dissolution to occur. The replacement Government in the meantime passed the Supply Bill as it stood. Fraser acted improperly and Kerr acted improperly. Whitlam was turfed out on his ear. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

The Australian people turfed him out on 13 December 1975. He lost half of Labor's seats. They could have reelected him if he was really that great. They didn't because he wasn't.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 44861
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #879 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:47am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 9:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE

Whitlam was elected to become the Prime Minister of Australia. He commanded the greatest number of seats in the house of Representatives. Under the Westminster system that made him Prime Minister, Soren. The Senate decided to not obey the PM and threw a spanner in the works and refused to pass the Supply Bill to finance the Government. The GG decided to intervene and caused a Double Dissolution to occur. The replacement Government in the meantime passed the Supply Bill as it stood. Fraser acted improperly and Kerr acted improperly. Whitlam was turfed out on his ear. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

The Australian people turfed him out on 13 December 1975. He lost half of Labor's seats. They could have reelected him if he was really that great. They didn't because he wasn't.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103262 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Immigration Reply #880 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:48am Frank - why did you post the same answer 5 times?
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95326
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #881 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 7:54am

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE they turn on you.

You don't need a mail order fake DD to realise that, do you?

Oh, but he did. Medicare, education, yarts, Boongs, child care, women's - ahem - health. He was erected to do it all.

Haven't you heard his jolly song?

Now, if you don't want nice things like that, you can jolly well go back to Denmark.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 44861 Gender:	Re: Immigration Reply #882 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 8:01am Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2024 at 6:48am: Frank - why did you post the same answer 5 times? Sorry, 4g, standing in a queue, connection laggy. But bozo Karnal still doesn't get it.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 83870
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #883 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 8:03am

Anyway - current policy is allowing in far too many, destroying the economy and social fabric of Australia, and is deliberately bringing in antithetical groups. One reason for this last is that the process of 'affirmative action' and the self-developed 'need' to have people who 'speak-a da lingo' so they can even talk to 'immigrants' have lead to too many of the same kinds in and running the show at very nice remuneration, sometimes in between running their NDIS and property portfolio rorts and other tax dodges and introducing their relatives to the joys of Australian nepotism.

It frankly astounds me that at the moment, following the recent horrors, 'Palestinians' are being allowed in here. Who knows what mental diseases they bring and what future disasters will come of it. Why would they be any different from any other group - apart from the cultured Israelis - from the Middle East?

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 44861
Gender: male

Re: Immigration
Reply #884 - Mar 30^th, 2024 at 8:03am

Karnal wrote on Mar 30^th, 2024 at 7:54am:

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 6:39pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2024 at 5:27pm:

Whitlam was one of best PMs, hamstrung by a hostile Senate. He enacted a wave if legislation which changed Australia for the better. In comparison to his successors he was a star that lit up the sky. The Australian initially supported him but when he didn't do as he was told turned against him, badly. When Cyclone Tracey destroyed Darwin he was overseas and immediately came home. Compare that to Morriscum's efforts in Hawaii. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well, being ELECTED he was supposed to do as he was told.
When they elect you to do something and you do something else OF COURSE they turn on you.

You don't need a mail order fake DD to realise that, do you?

Oh, but he did. Medicare, education, yarts, Boongs, child care, women's - ahem - health. He was erected to do it all.

Haven't you heard his jolly song?

Now, if you don't want nice things like that, you can jolly well go back to Denmark.

They could have reelected him in 1975 if he was really that great. They didn't because he wasn't.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged